w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2000 by author

63426672@yahoo.com

• cable services (Wednesday, 4 October)

Aaron Swartz

• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? (Sunday, 31 December)

Al Gilman

• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Checkpoint 5.2 (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: media: I withdraw my bevocal complaint (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Def: Data Model (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ (Wednesday, 20 December)
• universal design of 'next' button (Thursday, 14 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Thursday, 14 December)
• diversity in web UI design (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: Clocks (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: proposed agenda for wcag F2F (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Request for requirements input for XHTML 2.0 (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: Navigating an application (Sunday, 1 October)

Alan J. Flavell

• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Structure Again! (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Technique: accessible scripts... (Monday, 20 November)
• Visual/logical Hebrew, was Re: FW: Irregular fonts and I18N (Wednesday, 8 November)
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Two *ding* (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)

alpha@highnetspeed.com

• I was paid $23,625 by a complete stranger! In less than a week... (Sunday, 1 October)

Andi Snow-Weaver/Austin/IBM

• Late regrets for 11/2/00 call (Thursday, 2 November)

Anne Pemberton

• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Merry Christmas (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Sunday, 24 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Basic Access Principles for Electronic and Information Technologies (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: the text in images issue (Saturday, 16 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Friday, 15 December)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: What's presentation? (Saturday, 2 December)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Proposal for guideline 1 (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Semantically Describing the Semantic Web (Friday, 24 November)
• RE: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: 21 November 2000 draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• RE: Text on banners (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Technique: accessible scripts... (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Sunday, 19 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Sunday, 19 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 17 November)
• Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: FW: Guideline 1.0 (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? (Friday, 3 November)
• FWD about FLASH (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: What is SVG? (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: What is SVG? (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: What is SVG? (Tuesday, 31 October)
• What is SVG? (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: CD and Web Accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Sunday, 22 October)
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Saturday, 21 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Does Britney Spears fart? (Sunday, 8 October)
• Case 5 (Friday, 6 October)
• RE: A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Sunday, 1 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Sunday, 1 October)

Aunspach, Dan A.

• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will des igners adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)

Bailey, Bruce

• Checkpoint 5.2 (Friday, 29 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Tuesday, 26 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Tuesday, 26 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Tuesday, 26 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Tuesday, 26 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Thursday, 21 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Thursday, 21 December)
• RE: Section 508 Standards are available (Thursday, 21 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: the text in images issue (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: the text in images issue (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: the text in images issue (Friday, 15 December)
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Friday, 15 December)
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• RE: Does WCAG 1.0 say alternate interfaces are a "last resort"? (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: What is SVG? (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Reason Clause (Was RE: Checkpoint 2.3) (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Checkpoint 5.3 (was RE: [media] WAI guidelines yield...) (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment (Thursday, 5 October)
• RE: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Monday, 2 October)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• CSS-Techs: Text formatting and position (Wednesday, 4 October)
• TECH-CSS: Use numbers, not names, for colors (Sunday, 1 October)

Bruce Bailey

• Re: yes/no on image text (Wednesday, 29 November)

bubblehead32@hotmail.com

• WOW!!! Highest Payouts Around!!!!!!!! (Sunday, 8 October)

by way of Al Gilman

• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Wednesday, 11 October)

by way of Wendy A Chisholm

• RE: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 18 December)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? (Sunday, 31 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Sunday, 31 December)
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? (Sunday, 31 December)
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? (Sunday, 31 December)
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Checkpoint 5.2 (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? (Thursday, 28 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Re: SUMMARY expands on CAPTION or TITLE _as required_ (Tuesday, 26 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Guidelines vs standards wasRE: Checkpoint on testability (Sunday, 24 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: WCAG Conformance Requirements (Sunday, 24 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Saturday, 23 December)
• Re: Indexing (Saturday, 23 December)
• Objective checkpoints RE: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• Re: Def: Data Model (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Some stats on browsers in use (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: Access Board and government regulations (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: http://www.open.gov.uk (fwd) (Sunday, 17 December)
• redundant alt text (Sunday, 17 December)
• http://www.open.gov.uk (fwd) (Saturday, 16 December)
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Saturday, 16 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Saturday, 9 December)
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• WAI Initiative in New Zealand (2) (fwd) (Thursday, 7 December)
• minutes from today part 1. (Thursday, 7 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Thursday, 7 December)
• Re: What's presentation? (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Assertion "tool" (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Assertion "tool" (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Browser characteristics (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: The fourth element? (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Proposal for guideline 1 (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Technique: accessible scripts... (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Technique: accessible scripts... (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: JavaScript Alternative Curiosity (Sunday, 5 November)
• Re: Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: Fixed-presentation formats (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: Reason Clause (Was RE: Checkpoint 2.3) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: text in images - WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Logos as trademarks [was Whales, owls, and geezers ] (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: the discussion on how to measure conformance (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid" (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Sv: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: Vs: Baseline capabilities (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Baseline capabilities (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: consensus (try 2): text in images (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Glossary and WCAG 2 (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: Glossary and WCAG 2 (Saturday, 14 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Saturday, 14 October)
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Saturday, 14 October)
• RE: Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: Server Side techniques discussion from F2F (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Friday, 13 October)
• Remember: Register for the CC/PP Developers Days! (fwd) (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: list of currently most used abriviations (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: Meta-Guidelines for Markup Language Design (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: SVG techniques (Thursday, 12 October)
• Constraint CSS (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: SVG techniques (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Why we need WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F (Wednesday, 11 October)
• SVG techniques (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Clocks (fwd) (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: Clocks (Friday, 6 October)

Chuck Hitchcock

• RE: Minutes from ever (Monday, 27 November)

Claus Thøgersen

• Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Thursday, 2 November)
• Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• Sv: 19 October 2000 minutes (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Sv: Logos as trademarks [was Whales, owls, and geezers ] (Tuesday, 24 October)
• browser conformance (Tuesday, 24 October)
• the discussion on how to measure conformance (Monday, 23 October)
• Sv: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F (Thursday, 19 October)
• Sv: Agenda (Thursday, 19 October)
• Sv: Vs: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• Sv: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary (Thursday, 19 October)
• Vs: Baseline capabilities (Wednesday, 18 October)
• device independence authoring wag2 and ua2 (Thursday, 12 October)
• request to join (Wednesday, 11 October)

Claus Th�gersen

• another way to state conformance (Saturday, 21 October)
• Sv: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Saturday, 21 October)
• Sv: 19 October 2000 minutes (Saturday, 21 October)
• Sv: 19 October 2000 minutes (Saturday, 21 October)
• list of currently most used abriviations (Thursday, 12 October)

companysales@dallasoffice.com

• 6 Million E-mail Addresses for $79!!! (Thursday, 2 November)

cursos@mail.estudar-na.net

• "Estudar na Net" - Ponto de Situa��o (Sunday, 5 November)
• "Estudar na Net" - Ponto de Situa��o (Saturday, 4 November)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• regrets for 12/21 and 12/28 (Tuesday, 19 December)
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Browser characteristics (Wednesday, 29 November)
• I regret my tardiness (Thursday, 16 November)
• RE: Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: consensus (try 2): text in images (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Saturday, 14 October)
• My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Server Side techniques discussion from F2F (Friday, 13 October)

Cynthia Waddell

• RE: Logos as trademarks (Tuesday, 21 November)

Dan Aunspach

• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)

Daniel Dardailler

• Device Independent Authoring Workshop "proceedings" (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Tuesday, 17 October)

David Sloan

• Usability Testing of WCAG (Thursday, 19 October)

Derek P

• <EMBED> vs. <OBJECT>, Totally lost! (Wednesday, 15 November)

Dick Brown

• Regrets for 11-2 conference call (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: rewrite 1.1 (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Tuesday, 17 October)

dkamen4492@aol.com

• UPCOMING ANIMAL CHIROPRACTIC SEMINARS (Sunday, 1 October)

Donovan Hipke

• Accessible? I think not! (Thursday, 7 December)
• Belated Regrets (Tuesday, 14 November)

drg@cuthof.se

• Fulfill Your Potential!!! (Saturday, 14 October)

EIGS Jesús Gazol

• New Programme for Physical Education and Training of Physic (Wednesday, 15 November)
• New Programme for Physical Education and Training of Physical Condition (Monday, 13 November)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: Glossary and WCAG 2 (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Glossary and WCAG 2 (Sunday, 15 October)
• Glossary and WCAG 2 (Saturday, 14 October)
• RE: Clocks (Saturday, 7 October)

foryou1@libero.it

• Ricevi gratis E-BUSINESS M@RKETING! (Monday, 16 October)

FREE_Satellite_Dish84621@worldonline.nl

• FREE SATELLITE SYSTEM ! ! ! 20870 (Friday, 20 October)

From The Halloween Ghost

• From the Halloween Redwood Ghost..for your kids (Monday, 16 October)

geoff freed

• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)

Greg Gay

• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Monday, 23 October)

Greg Kihlstrom

• Request to Join (Monday, 9 October)
• Request to Join (Monday, 9 October)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• Doug Wakefield speaks on the new 508 guidelines (Friday, 22 December)
• Basic Access Principles for Electronic and Information Technologies (Friday, 22 December)
• FW: Section 508 Standards are available (Thursday, 21 December)
• Rewording of Guideline 2 (Thursday, 30 November)
• FW: Guideline 1.0 (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Sunday, 29 October)
• 3.1 strawman (Thursday, 26 October)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Saturday, 21 October)
• why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: Vs: Baseline capabilities (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)

Hank Szeto

• Mistake in CSS-TECHS, Section 13 example (Monday, 11 December)

HGH@isi.fhg.de

• Reverse the Aging Process 10-20 Years! (Saturday, 11 November)

Hugo Haas

• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 16 October)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Irregular fonts and I18N (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Repaired WCAG 1.0 Techniques documents (6 November drafts) (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: WAI media Conformance? (Saturday, 4 November)
• Re: Reason Clause (Was RE: Checkpoint 2.3) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Please review: slight modifcation to proposal (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)

Jason Hinkin

• happy halloween from spiderlight.com (Wednesday, 1 November)

Jason White

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Agenda (Thursday, 21 December)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 13 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Monday, 11 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Saturday, 9 December)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 6 December)
• Re: The fourth element? (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Comments on 21 November draft (Thursday, 23 November)
• Review of User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 14 November)
• Checkpoints 4.3 and 6.3 (Thursday, 9 November)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Re: REMINDER: User Agent Accessibility Guideline in Last Call until 13 November (Thursday, 2 November)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: What is SVG? (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Fixed-presentation formats (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 (Sunday, 29 October)
• Checkpoint 2.3 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Checkpoint 1.1 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: user-friendly (Friday, 27 October)
• Agenda (Thursday, 26 October)
• Remarks on WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 discussion (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary (Thursday, 19 October)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Checkpoints 2.3-2.5, 6.1 and 6.4 (Thursday, 12 October)
• Agenda (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? (Thursday, 12 October)
• Action item on user interfaces (Friday, 6 October)
• Multiple versions (Thursday, 5 October)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: Checkpoint 5.2 (Friday, 29 December)

Jon Gunderson

• Access Board and government regulations (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 (Wednesday, 6 December)
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: Rewording of Guideline 2 (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: FW: Guideline 1.0 (Friday, 3 November)
• REMINDER: User Agent Accessibility Guideline in Last Call until 13 November (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: What is SVG? (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: Shared Guidelines Glossary (Tuesday, 17 October)

jonathan chetwynd

• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: WAI media Conformance? (Thursday, 9 November)
• WAI media Conformance? (Saturday, 4 November)
• accessibility (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? (Friday, 3 November)
• Removal of SVG? Re: What is SVG? (Thursday, 2 November)
• Macromedia Flash and SVG was: Re: What is SVG? (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: What is SVG? (Wednesday, 1 November)
• http://www.willing-to-try.com/ (Friday, 6 October)
• Does Britney Spears fart? (Friday, 6 October)

Judy Brewer

• Re: Detail on agenda item #4, scope & dependency sections of WCAG WG charter (Thursday, 26 October)
• Detail on agenda item #4, scope & dependency sections of WCAG WG charter (Thursday, 26 October)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Def: Data Model (Thursday, 21 December)
• Minutes Nov 30, 2000 (Friday, 8 December)
• Regrets (Thursday, 16 November)
• Regrets (Thursday, 9 November)
• Regrets (Thursday, 9 November)
• RE: Vanilla Version of checker (Friday, 27 October)
• Regrets (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Courts not bound by section 508 (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: consensus (try 2): text in images (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Friday, 13 October)
• RE: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Minutes from the F2F meeting (Wednesday, 11 October)
• FW: Ligatures in .PDF files. (Wednesday, 11 October)
• FW: Clocks (Tuesday, 10 October)

Kynn Bartlett

• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: CSS logo (Wednesday, 27 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Tuesday, 26 December)
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 25 December)
• Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Indexing (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Indexing (Saturday, 23 December)
• Usecase for Testability/Compliance Claims (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• WCAG Conformance Requirements (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Charter suggestion [was Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Regrets for Today's Call (Thursday, 21 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Re: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Tuesday, 19 December)
• SVG Plugin from (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: Test cases for images of text. (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: redundant alt text (Sunday, 17 December)
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Saturday, 16 December)
• RE: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Saturday, 16 December)
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Saturday, 16 December)
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Friday, 15 December)
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Friday, 15 December)
• Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Thursday, 14 December)
• Re: Regrets (Thursday, 14 December)
• Checkpoints Appreciated By Web Designers (Tuesday, 12 December)
• Regrets for This Week (Wednesday, 6 December)
• Re: What's presentation? (Saturday, 2 December)
• Separating Content and Presentation: Myth? (Saturday, 2 December)
• Attack on Macromedia's Support for Accessibility (Saturday, 2 December)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Process (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: yes/no on image text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: The fourth element? (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: yes/no on image text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Structure Again! (not again ;) (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (not again ;) (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Comments on 21 November draft (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 27 November)
• Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 27 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Use of Summaries as Meta-Data (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Model template for techniques? (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Regrets Again (Wednesday, 15 November)
• Regrets for 9 November (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Re: FW: Guideline 1.0 (Friday, 3 November)
• Re: guideline 2 (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Does WCAG 1.0 say alternate interfaces are a "last resort"? (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• Third Forward from Wise Women List (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 1.1 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: user-friendly (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Who provides the stylesheets (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Who provides the stylesheets (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: CD and Web Accessibility (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• CD and Web Accessibility (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Remarks on WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 discussion (Wednesday, 25 October)
• From the WiseWomen List: Reply #2 (Wednesday, 25 October)
• From the Wise-Women List: Reply #1 (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Dori Smith's Question on Browser Baseline (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Logos as trademarks (Monday, 23 October)
• Free As In Beer (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Waffling? (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: the discussion on how to measure conformance (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Sunday, 22 October)
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Sunday, 22 October)
• Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• Upcoming Online Course: Designing for Universal Accessibility (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Friday, 13 October)
• Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: Meta-Guidelines for Markup Language Design (Thursday, 12 October)
• Meta-Guidelines for Markup Language Design (Thursday, 12 October)

kynn@idyllmtn.com

• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Monday, 9 October)
• Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Monday, 9 October)

L. Scott Sagnette

• Our 'Check-In Check-Out' © Software Simplifies Everything! (Sunday, 5 November)

larry76_4@vitaminic.co.uk

• Earn $50,000 in 90 Days! (Sunday, 15 October)

Law Library Computer Lab

• Re: New Book: "Brothers Beware: Games Black Women Play"! (Thursday, 12 October)

Leonard R. Kasday

• Accessibility vs. consideration X: how to handle (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Friday, 29 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Friday, 29 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Charter suggestion [was Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Checkpoint on testability (Thursday, 21 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• New guideline needed: user agent independence (Tuesday, 19 December)
• RE: local copies of WAI logo (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Test cases for images of text. (Monday, 18 December)
• Example of Three labeled buttons[was "the text in images issue"] (Monday, 18 December)
• local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Thursday, 14 December)
• RE: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• Re: User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Friday, 8 December)
• User agent capabilities [was Agenda (Thursday, 7 December)
• What's presentation? (Friday, 1 December)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Friday, 24 November)
• Regrets for 9 November (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Monday, 6 November)
• Re: Fixed-presentation formats (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: Sv: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Who provides the stylesheets (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Yet another graphic button with CSS styled text (Thursday, 26 October)
• Who provides the stylesheets (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Thursday, 26 October)
• Yet another graphic button with CSS styled text (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Let's get back to work (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Logos as trademarks (Monday, 23 October)
• Automatic Language Identification (Monday, 23 October)
• application to join group (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Logos as trademarks (Monday, 23 October)
• Logos as trademarks [was Whales, owls, and geezers ] (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)

leslie45_23@weblyte.co.uk

• 6 Million E-mail addresses for $79!! (Tuesday, 10 October)

Lisa Seeman

• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup -the other side (Sunday, 31 December)
• the logo again (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup (Saturday, 30 December)
• CSS logo (Wednesday, 27 December)
• Fw: Test cases for images of text. (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Re: the text in images issue (Tuesday, 19 December)
• RE: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• FW: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Browser characteristics (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Structure Again! (not again ;) (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Minutes from ever (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Text on banners (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: Visual/logical Hebrew, was Re: FW: Irregular fonts and I18N (Thursday, 9 November)
• FW: Irregular fonts and I18N (Wednesday, 8 November)
• RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• guideline 2 (Thursday, 2 November)
• RE: Agenda (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: Guideline/Checkpoint "modifiers" (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Sunday, 29 October)
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will des adopt? -your joking (Thursday, 26 October)
• the "text in images" thread - why it won't work (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• RE: Fwd: Accessibility, discrimination, and WCAG 2.0 (Tuesday, 24 October)
• text in images (Tuesday, 24 October)
• RE: rewrite 1.1 (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Sunday, 22 October)
• RE: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Sunday, 22 October)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• rewrite 1.1 (Thursday, 12 October)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Regrets (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? (Wednesday, 11 October)
• where does the lang technique fit in the 2.0 Guidelines? (Wednesday, 11 October)

m. may

• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Monday, 16 October)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Saturday, 14 October)
• Re: SVG techniques (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Friday, 29 September)

Marshall Jansen

• Regrets for Today's Call (Thursday, 21 December)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Monday, 2 October)

Marti

• Re: ALT vs. TITLE usage in WAI logo example (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Indexing (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Some stats on browsers in use (Tuesday, 19 December)
• JavaScript Alternative Curiosity (Saturday, 4 November)
• Re: Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: Clocks (Friday, 6 October)
• Clocks (Friday, 6 October)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• Re: Irregular fonts and I18N (Wednesday, 8 November)

Matt May

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: the text in images issue (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: the text in images issue (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: the text in images issue (Monday, 18 December)

Michael Cooper

• Comments on September 28 draft (Thursday, 5 October)

Mike Williams

• Re: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: <EMBED> vs. <OBJECT>, Totally lost! (Wednesday, 15 November)
• Flash Guidelines review (Thursday, 9 November)

remizzen@ratt-n-roll.com

• --Find Out ANYTHING About ANYONE!! (Wednesday, 11 October)

Ricardo Sánchez

• ALT with INPUT (Monday, 18 December)

Robert Neff

• RE: Section 508 Standards are available (Thursday, 21 December)
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Sunday, 17 December)
• Re: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: Text on banners (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Flash and WCAG (Saturday, 28 October)

rsb@docsj.de

• At last, HERBAL V the all natural alternative! (Monday, 9 October)

Scott Luebking

• Re: Some results from testing forms errors (Thursday, 16 November)
• Some results from testing forms errors (Thursday, 16 November)

SDPFSDP@mail.dit.co.kr

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Tuesday, 17 October)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Question from XHTML-L: Content in CSS? (Sunday, 31 December)
• Re: Rationale for using RGB Values? (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup (Saturday, 30 December)
• WCAG MarkUp Logo Uploaded (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Conformance Logo in Markup (Saturday, 30 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Rationale for using RGB Values? (Friday, 29 December)
• Conformance Logo in Markup (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Indexing (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Indexing (Saturday, 23 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Regrets (Thursday, 21 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Re: New guideline needed: user agent independence (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Friday, 15 December)
• Regrets (Thursday, 14 December)
• Regrets (Thursday, 7 December)
• Re: Separating Content and Presentation: Myth? (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: What's presentation? (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: What's presentation? (Friday, 1 December)
• Regrets (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Assertion "tool" (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (not again ;) (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Thoughts on the new Draft of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16th November WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Sunday, 19 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 17 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 17 November)
• Regrets for Telecon (Thursday, 16 November)
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} (Thursday, 16 November)
• Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} (Thursday, 16 November)
• Request to Join (Monday, 13 November)

Sean Proske

• Would you like to trade links? (Sunday, 15 October)

secretariado@mail.estudar-na.net

• Como Estudar na Internet? (Saturday, 28 October)
• Estudar na Internet (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Estudar-na.Net - Venha conhecer-nos (Sunday, 22 October)

Stocknews

• TonyWorth.com "WORTH A LOOK" (Monday, 6 November)

the hit factory.net

• ADV: AFFORDABLE COMPUTER REPAIR & WEBSITE DESIGN (Tuesday, 14 November)

TITUS SINGH

• A tithe of pages: towards an animated browsing environment (Wednesday, 4 October)

Trans Continental Technologies

• Business & Sales Leads (Trans Continental Technologies :- Business and Sales lead generation software) CTI :-Computer Telephony Integration (Monday, 2 October)

travis@thirdtry.com

• Hey, check out this band! (Monday, 23 October)

v@bsvbb.de

• At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative! (Monday, 6 November)
• At last, Herbal V, the all Natural Alternative! (Saturday, 4 November)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Minutes from 21 December 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 21 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Thursday, 21 December)
• Februrary all W3C meeting (Friday, 15 December)
• Minutes from 14 December 2000 WCAG WG (Thursday, 14 December)
• Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Thursday, 14 December)
• Re: Mistake in CSS-TECHS, Section 13 example (Tuesday, 12 December)
• clarification on regrets (previous e-mail) (Thursday, 30 November)
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] Regrets for 30 Nov. and 7 Dec. (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• 21 November 2000 draft of WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Model template for techniques? (Friday, 17 November)
• Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 16 November)
• New proposal for 2.3 - still in the works (Sunday, 12 November)
• typo in Minutes for 09 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 9 November)
• Minutes for 09 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 9 November)
• Great article: A Dao of Web Design (Thursday, 9 November)
• Irregular fonts and I18N (was: RE: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available) (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Minutes of 2 November 2000 WCAG WG Telecon (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: What is SVG? (Tuesday, 31 October)
• US time changes (Monday, 30 October)
• 26 October 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 26 October)
• text in images - WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 26 October)
• summary of the 8 proposals for checkpoint 3.1 (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Please review: slight modifcation to proposal (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• notes from claus from PDF session at F2F (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• New draft of WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• 19 October 2000 minutes (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Terminology Problem: "Avoid" (Thursday, 19 October)
• URGENT Next face-to-face: picking dates from plenary (Wednesday, 18 October)
• consensus (try 2): text in images (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)
• Shared Guidelines Glossary (Monday, 16 October)
• consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: XML and XSLT Versions of Draft WCAG 2.0 (Monday, 16 October)
• Updated open issues list (Friday, 13 October)
• minutes from 12 October 2000 telecon (Thursday, 12 October)
• Checkpoint mapping between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 12 October)
• Minutes from the F2F meeting (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Summary of action items, resolutions, and open issues from the F2F (Wednesday, 11 October)
• proposed agenda for wcag F2F (Wednesday, 4 October)

William Loughborough

• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Friday, 29 December)
• Re: Question on abbreviations (fwd) (Thursday, 28 December)
• Re: Indexing (Monday, 25 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Getting Old (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Indexing (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Indexing (Sunday, 24 December)
• Re: Usecase for Testability/Compliance Claims (Sunday, 24 December)
• Indexing (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Saturday, 23 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Minutes from 21 December 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• RE: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Basic Access Principles for Electronic and Information Technologies (Friday, 22 December)
• Re: Checkpoint on testability (Thursday, 21 December)
• Sayings of "Saints" (Thursday, 21 December)
• RE: SVG Plugin from Adobe (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Pertinent Sagacity? (Wednesday, 20 December)
• Re: the text in images issue (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: Test cases for images of text. (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: local copies of WAI logo (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: the text in images issue (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: the text in images issue (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: the text in images issue (Monday, 18 December)
• RE: the text in images issue [was: errata...] (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Conformance in WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Errata for WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 3.1 (i.e. the text in images issue) (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 December)
• Re: Separating Content and Presentation: Myth? (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: Attack on Macromedia's Support for Accessibility (Saturday, 2 December)
• Re: What's presentation? (Friday, 1 December)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: Should we consider factors other than accessibility [was Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Assertion "tool" (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Accessibility of SMIL 2.0 (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Process (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Browser characteristics (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Wednesday, 29 November)
• The fourth element? (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Kynn's Reply: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• yes/no on image text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Proposal: delete 3.4 and 3.9 (Tuesday, 28 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Minutes from ever (Monday, 27 November)
• Minutes from ever (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Structure Again! (Friday, 24 November)
• Structure Again! (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Comments on 21 November draft (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 23 November)
• Re: 21 November 2000 draft of WCAG 2.0 (Wednesday, 22 November)
• RE: Text on banners (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Tuesday, 21 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Monday, 20 November)
• RDF, etc. (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Saturday, 18 November)
• Re: Minutes from 16 November 2000 WCAG WG telecon (Friday, 17 November)
• Re: New proposal for 2.3 - still in the works (Thursday, 16 November)
• Re: Thoughts on WCAG 2.0 {3.2} (Thursday, 16 November)
• Re: Flash Guidelines review (Friday, 10 November)
• Fwd: Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Structure (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 8 November)
• Aside re sounds (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: 7 November 2000 WCAG 2.0 draft available (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: Reminder: UA last call review (Saturday, 4 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Thursday, 2 November)
• Re: diversity in web UI design (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 1 November)
• RE: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: Multiple interfaces - a concrete example (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Guideline/Checkpoint "modifiers" (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: Text in buttons - a solution and proposal. (Everybody happy?) (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Sunday, 29 October)
• Redundant checkpoints? (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 2.3 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: Checkpoint 1.1 (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: user-friendly (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: Vanilla Version of checker (Friday, 27 October)
• Vanilla Version of checker (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: General Exception for Essential Purpose (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: user-friendly (Friday, 27 October)
• user-friendly (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Detail on agenda item #4, scope & dependency sections of WCAG WG charter (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Yet another graphic button with CSS styled text (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Sv: Question from Last Week's WCAG Teleconference (Thursday, 26 October)
• raster/vector (Thursday, 26 October)
• RE: Please review for this week's call: proposal and process for the "text in images" thread (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Let's get back to work (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: Len's CSS solution for the text in image problem - will designers adopt? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Waffles, anyone? (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Waffling? (Sunday, 22 October)
• Re: the discussion on how to measure conformance (Sunday, 22 October)
• Whales, owls, and geezers (Saturday, 21 October)
• Re: why ALT text alone doesn't suffice for many blind/VI users (Saturday, 21 October)
• RE: 19 October 2000 minutes (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• RE: Baseline capabilities (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: rewrite 1.1 (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Tuesday, 17 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: consensus?? RE: Textual Images vs. Styled Text, Round Three *ding* (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Saturday, 14 October)
• Fwd: Words (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: Additional issue for alternate interfaces (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: My Action Item: Multiple interface guideline (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: Requirement for Disability-based Checkpoint Identification (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: Navigating an application (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: Why CSS On Older Browsers Is Broken (Thursday, 12 October)

小林洋文堂

• 始めまして　オフィス用品をお安く (Monday, 23 October)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 December 2000 11:38:38 UTC