- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 10:25:54 -0800
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 10:04 AM 12/22/00 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>just to make a web accessibility evaluator's job easier.
It's because the "accessibility evaluator" is not a distinct person from
the "user". One aspect of using the Web is to be able to tell if a portion
thereof is going to be accessible. One could use a tool to determine this
if the testability information were included.
It's a P2 simply because its absence makes "...difficult for people with
disabilities to access the web" in the above sense. One thing about the Web
(as distinct from particular Web chunks) that matters is being able to
determine if a site will work for your circumstances. This can only be
determined by an agent of yours if it's testable..
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 22 December 2000 13:25:43 UTC