- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 20:53:28 -0000
- To: "Anne Pemberton" <apembert@crosslink.net>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> XHTML is at best a > crappy presentation language You said it, not me. > If you were designing a language to model those sites, you > would -not- create- XHTML, and that's why it is such a > poor choice for a data language for conveying web content. Yeah, but it's a good idea to intrinsically link the system of documents and data somehow (er..like an holistic Web). Whilst we're at it, let's discuss the relative merits of namespaces, and why URNs shouldn't be used as SysID's :-) Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/swr/ "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Monday, 27 November 2000 15:53:08 UTC