ISSUE-1
Fix tracker |
CLOSED |
Why is tracker not public? |
2014-01-24 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-2 |
CLOSED |
Update PILOD use-case |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-3 |
CLOSED |
Remove the name of contributors |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-4 |
CLOSED |
Add a matrix table to summarize UCs vs challenges/requirements |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-5 |
CLOSED |
Use case #1 - Include reference |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-6 |
CLOSED |
Use case #6 - Add technical challenges and make a link to ESWC2013 |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-7 |
CLOSED |
Fix use cases without challenges or requirements |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-8 |
CLOSED |
Include more metadata about the use cases |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-9 |
CLOSED |
Remove the name of contributors |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-10 |
CLOSED |
Data usage meaning |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-11 |
CLOSED |
Color challenges and requirements |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-12 |
CLOSED |
Add a table to summarize the requirements |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-13 |
CLOSED |
Improve Use case "Documented Support and Release of Data" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-14 |
CLOSED |
Improve Use case "Feedback Loop for Corrections" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-15 |
CLOSED |
Improve Use case "Datasets required for Natural Disaster Management" and "OKFN Tranport WG" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-16 |
CLOSED |
Improve Use case "Tracking of data usage" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-17 |
CLOSED |
Improve Use case "Open City Data Pipeline" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-18 |
CLOSED |
Review Use case "Machine-readability of SLAs" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-19 |
CLOSED |
Add requirements to Use case NYC Open Data Program |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-20 |
CLOSED |
Review use cases organization - change the order |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-21 |
CLOSED |
Remove conformance section |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-22 |
CLOSED |
Add reference to Use case #5 |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-23 |
CLOSED |
Review definition of interoperability |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-24 |
CLOSED |
Remove bio details |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-25 |
CLOSED |
Review requirements: R-SelectHighValue and R-SelectHighDemand |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-26 |
CLOSED |
Group Dados.gov.br and Radar Palarmentar |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-27 |
CLOSED |
Review requirements for metadata, license, provenance and vocabularies |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-28 |
CLOSED |
Clarify the difference between R-DynamicGeneration and R-AutomaticUpdate |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-29 |
CLOSED |
Clarify requirements on metadata |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-30 |
CLOSED |
Change names of requirements: R-Persistent and R-PersArchiving |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-31 |
CLOSED |
Define categories for the use cases based on the level of use cases details |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-32 |
CLOSED |
Create different categories for challenges or change the name for "Challenge" |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-33 |
CLOSED |
Review requirements without motivation |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-34 |
CLOSED |
Review requirement: R-MetadataOpen |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-35 |
CLOSED |
Review requirement: R-GranularityMax |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-36 |
CLOSED |
Review requirement: R-FormatMachineRead |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-37 |
CLOSED |
Change requirement's description: R-FormatLocalise |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-38 |
CLOSED |
Review motivation for R-SelectHighValue |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-39 |
CLOSED |
Fix requirements with same description: R-LicenseMachineRead and R-ProvMachineRead |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-40 |
CLOSED |
Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage |
2014-06-03 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-41 |
CLOSED |
Update Use Case #4 - OKFN Tranport WG |
2014-06-05 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-42
Closed data |
CLOSED |
Have we covered closed data? |
2014-06-06 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-43
Connections |
CLOSED |
Connect UCR with BP etc |
2014-06-06 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-44 |
CLOSED |
Bernadette to review existing vocabularies (like http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/23) to learn from them for our vocabularies |
2014-06-13 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-45 |
CLOSED |
Tpac |
2014-09-26 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-46
PIDs |
CLOSED |
How should we handle the issue of persistent URI design? |
2014-10-01 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-47
Biometrics |
CLOSED |
Do we need the metrics from Bio2RDF? |
2014-10-02 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-48 |
CLOSED |
Phil to look at whether the ucr doc sufficiently covers code lists |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-49 |
CLOSED |
Phil to either improve on the definition of "reference vocabulary", or point to existing definitions |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-50 |
CLOSED |
Bernadette to help us find more use cases on the vocabulary itself (including creating a vocabulary) |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-51 |
CLOSED |
Phil to clarify the use of the word "provenance" any potential confusion it causes |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-52 |
CLOSED |
We keep having confusion around our terms. (glossary?) |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-53 |
CLOSED |
Whether sla is/can be thought of as part of the licence or whether it needs to be pulled out spearately? |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-54 |
CLOSED |
The term "sla" is vague, undefined, and may not actually represent an agreement between the publisher and reuser |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-55 |
CLOSED |
The word "granularity" can been many things. scope, city/state/country, data aggregation |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-56 |
CLOSED |
We need context and examples. do they go into the rec-track documents or into a separate note? |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-57 |
CLOSED |
R-datalifecycleprivacy, r-sensitiveprivacy and r-sensitivesecurity and the topics they represent may or not be in scope for the working group |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-58 |
CLOSED |
What do we mean with bulk 4.1.9 r-accessbulk |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-59 |
CLOSED |
We should agree on a definition for "real time" |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-60 |
CLOSED |
Does 4.1.9 accurately reflect the use cases? and can it be better summarised as data availability? |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-61 |
CLOSED |
R-archiving appears to be out of scope. we must ask christophe, who put it in |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-62 |
CLOSED |
What info is given when dereferencing a persistent identifier after the resource has been removed/archived |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-63 |
CLOSED |
If a resource is archived, is the correct response 410, 303 or something else? |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-64 |
CLOSED |
Jeremy t's expression of concern over 'data must be complete' - not realistic. better to say where it isn't complete |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-65 |
CLOSED |
How to carry forward the data quality issue - more use cases? available options? text only? machine readable dimensions? |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-66 |
CLOSED |
We need more use cases to get the requirements to define the data usage vocabulary |
2014-10-30 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-67 |
CLOSED |
Should we include a best practice around which format to use? (csv, json, json-ld, xml, etc.) |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-68 |
CLOSED |
We should define "structured" |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-69 |
CLOSED |
Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-70 |
CLOSED |
Should we include data enrichment in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-71 |
CLOSED |
We have use cases for feedback but is it in scope given the 3 axiomatic criteria resolved at tpac |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-72
Data Enrichment Scope |
CLOSED |
Is data enrichment in scope for dwbp? |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-73 |
CLOSED |
What exactly is the audience for the bp doc? |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-74 |
CLOSED |
Is it in scope to include mention of policy framework etc. as part of the non-normative discussion/editorialisation of the bp doc |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-75 |
CLOSED |
Whether it would be helpful to this wg if jeni's work at http://www.w3.org/tr/urls-in-data/ were to be published as a tag finding |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-76 |
CLOSED |
What advice do we give about publishing metadata so that we identify the intended outcome without making assumptions that maybe false? |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-77 |
CLOSED |
We need to bring the COMURI work into the Best Practices format agreed at the TPAC F2F |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-78 |
CLOSED |
What is the best order for the elements in the best practices template |
2014-10-31 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-79
metatype |
CLOSED |
Discovery vs structural metadata |
2014-11-06 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-80 |
CLOSED |
We need a definition of "dataset" |
2014-11-07 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-81
BPTemplate |
CLOSED |
Is the best practices template still right? http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html |
2014-11-07 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-82
Dataset |
CLOSED |
What is the definition of a dataset? |
2014-11-07 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-83
LuSTRE |
CLOSED |
New Reqs from LuSTRE Use Case |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-84
Portal resilience |
CLOSED |
Should DCAT include a pointer to a mirror/back up? |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-85
R-DataLifecycleStage |
CLOSED |
New Req: Data should be identified by a designated lifecycle stage |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-86
R-DataIrreproducibility |
CLOSED |
New req: Data should be designated if it is irreproducible |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-87
R-DesignatedUserExpertise |
CLOSED |
New req: Data should be designated if either by virtue of its complexity or its nature is relevant to users with specific expertise. |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-88
R-DesignatedThingsServiceProviders |
CLOSED |
New req: Data produced by things or services should be associated with complete things/services metadata descriptions. |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-89
R-SoftwareDataUsage |
CLOSED |
New req: Data should be annotated with descriptions of software applications using the data |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-90
R-UsageFeedback |
CLOSED |
new req: Data consumers should have a way of sharing feedback and rating data |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-91
R-Location |
CLOSED |
New req: Locations (countries, regions, cities etc.) must be referred to consistently |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-92
Dropping Formats |
CLOSED |
OK to drop last word of 'Requirements for Data Formats' from challenges/req list? |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-93
Open SLAs |
CLOSED |
Free Open Data SLAs for Open Data publishing |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-94
Git for data |
CLOSED |
Dataset versioning and dataset replication |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-95
MSI |
CLOSED |
Requirements derived from MSI use case |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-96
Share-PSI |
CLOSED |
Is the WG happy with the Share-PSI use case |
2014-11-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-97
Axoims in UCR |
CLOSED |
Should we include the three axioms in the UCR |
2014-11-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-98
R-QualityOpinions |
CLOSED |
R-QualityOpinions and R-IncorporateFeedback seem to be duplicates? |
2014-11-13 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-99
Timeline |
CLOSED |
Our timelines are hopelessly out of date... |
2014-11-13 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-100
BPs and Lifecyle |
CLOSED |
organising BPs around Life Cycle |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-101
Challenges table |
CLOSED |
Should we use a table to present the challenges? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-102
UC-BP link |
CLOSED |
Uuse Cases-BP links |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-103
User types |
CLOSED |
Should we talk about the diff types of user |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-104
Evidence of Relevance |
CLOSED |
Can we say that the evidence section shows the relevance of the BP? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-105
MD or BP for MD |
CLOSED |
Metadata or Best Practices for Metadata? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-106
Req Meaning |
CLOSED |
Meaning of R-MetadataStandardized & R-MetadataDocument |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-107
Similar Reqs |
CLOSED |
R-MultipleRepresentations and R-FormatMultiple |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-108
R-FormatLocalize |
CLOSED |
Where does R-FormatLocalize go? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-109
machine Readable Licence? |
CLOSED |
No UCR for machine readable licences |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-110
DQV in BP? |
CLOSED |
Data Quality vocab reqs in BP Doc? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-111
Def: Granularity |
CLOSED |
What is data Granularity? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-112
R-AccessUptodate |
CLOSED |
R-AccessUptodate for data Access? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-113
Versioning |
CLOSED |
No req for versioning? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-114
Feedback |
CLOSED |
Feedback required? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-115
Share-PSI |
CLOSED |
Can we align Share-PSI and DWBP templates? |
2015-01-09 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-116 |
CLOSED |
Best Practices for Data Quality - Insertion of specific strategies apart from DATA QUALITY Vocabulary |
2015-01-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-117 |
CLOSED |
Should Data quality vocabulary be mentioned as specific strategy in BP Document? |
2015-01-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-118 |
CLOSED |
New Requirement suggestion R-VersionURIDesign |
2015-01-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-119
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Data Consumer x Data User |
2015-01-13 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-120
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Review BP Document metadata x BP Provide metadata in different formats x BP Document Vocabularies |
2015-01-14 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-121
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Requirements for human readable metadata |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-122
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Review Provide Metadata Standardized BP |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-123
Sensitive Data |
CLOSED |
Use of SHOULD versus MUST for Sensitive Data |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-124 |
CLOSED |
Overlap between Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data and DWBP |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-125
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Discuss the relation between DWBP and Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-126
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Review the specialization hierarchy between Provide Metadata BP and other BP |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-127 |
CLOSED |
Discuss the use of SchemaVer on the Implementation of the Provide Versioning Information BP |
2015-01-15 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-128 |
CLOSED |
To discuss about BP specialization Vocabulary versioning BP x Provide versioning information BP |
2015-01-16 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-129
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Review specialization hierarchies between BP |
2015-01-17 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-130
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Reuse vocabularies BP is incomplete |
2015-01-17 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-131
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Follow REST principles when designing APIs BP is incomplete. |
2015-01-17 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-132
BernadetteLoscio |
CLOSED |
Review Document Metadata BP |
2015-01-17 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-133
Standard metadata |
CLOSED |
SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-134 |
CLOSED |
About Formats, schemas, vocabularies and data models |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-135 |
CLOSED |
Use of RFC2119 |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-136 |
CLOSED |
Proposal for Metadata BP |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-137 |
CLOSED |
Review BP Preserve person's right to privacy |
2015-01-22 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-138 |
CLOSED |
Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in two? |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-139 |
CLOSED |
Suggests additional content for BP1 implementation |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-140 |
CLOSED |
Should we include the data lifecycle in the best practices document? |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-141 |
CLOSED |
title and subtitle are normative ? |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-142 |
CLOSED |
About multilingualism |
2015-01-22 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-143 |
CLOSED |
Is Data Preservation in the scope of the DWBP document? |
2015-01-25 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-144 |
CLOSED |
There is a technological bias in several parts of the document |
2015-01-25 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-145
Caroline Burle |
CLOSED |
It makes sense to have a BP "Use unique identifiers"? |
2015-01-26 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-146
TheNorm |
CLOSED |
Which section of a BP should be normative? |
2015-01-30 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-147 |
CLOSED |
We should differentiate a metadata document from documenting metadata (meta metadata) |
2015-02-13 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-148
ericstephan |
CLOSED |
Can we use the five star rating system as a BP document metric to describe Open Data instead of a path to LD? |
2015-03-20 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-149 |
CLOSED |
How to handle metadata that is embedded in the document? |
2015-04-09 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-150 |
CLOSED |
Decide how examples are included in bp doc |
2015-04-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-151
DataEnrichment |
CLOSED |
Connections of the data enrichment work of inweb (ufmg) to the deliverables of the wg |
2015-04-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-152
annette_g |
CLOSED |
Should we add a data enrichment BP? |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-153
open/closed DUV |
CLOSED |
Should open/closed data be addressed in the Data Usage Vocabulary? |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-154 |
CLOSED |
Handling data usage references to collection of datasets |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-155 |
CLOSED |
Target audience for vocabulary |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-156 |
CLOSED |
Protocol for referring to related efforts |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-157 |
CLOSED |
Considering other kinds of data usage |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-158 |
CLOSED |
Modeling R-Citable in vocabulary |
2015-04-10 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-159 |
CLOSED |
Is R-QualityOpinions more of a Data Usage Vocabulary concept? |
2015-04-12 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-160
annette_g |
CLOSED |
Should we add at BP about subsetting data? |
2015-04-13 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-161 |
CLOSED |
Whether we should recommend https by default, rather than http |
2015-04-14 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-162 |
CLOSED |
|
2015-04-14 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-163 |
CLOSED |
Should the bp document refer to uris or identifiers |
2015-04-14 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-164
RiccardoAlbertoni |
CLOSED |
Are statistics about a dataset a kind of quality info we need to include in the data quality vocabulary? |
2015-05-04 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-165
RiccardoAlbertoni |
CLOSED |
What is the relation between duv:Feedback and dqv:UserFeedback? |
2015-05-04 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-166 |
CLOSED |
Should the data vocabularies section be removed? |
2015-05-21 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-167
Date & Numeric formats |
CLOSED |
DCAT lacking in date, time and number formats |
2015-06-11 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-168
Dataset versioning |
CLOSED |
Dataset versioning |
2015-06-11 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-169 |
CLOSED |
Should usage be specified at the Dataset or Distribution level? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-170 |
CLOSED |
Should we use Software or earl:Software instead of duv:Application? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-171 |
CLOSED |
Should dct:creator or doap:developer be used instead of duv:developedBy? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-172 |
CLOSED |
Should duv:generates be removed? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-173 |
CLOSED |
The use of cito:CitationAct and duv:Citation should be reviewed. |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-174 |
CLOSED |
The meaning of duv:retains is not clear. More examples should be provided and its use should be reviewed. |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-175 |
CLOSED |
Shouldn't duv:DatasetCorrection be a dcat:Dataset as well? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-176 |
CLOSED |
Should prov:SoftwareAgent be used instead of Application/WebOfThing? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-177 |
CLOSED |
Should duv:consumes be used instead of duv:consumed? Should we be able to reify Consumption? |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-178 |
CLOSED |
The definition of duv:Feedback needs to be reviewed because it is not clear if it should be a subclass of oa:Annotation or just an instance of oa:Motivation. |
2015-06-11 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-179 |
CLOSED |
The Working Group is considering to put all new classes and properties (together with the ones of the Data Usage Vocabulary) in the DCAT namespace. |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-180 |
CLOSED |
Are we actually allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ? |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-181 |
CLOSED |
Should we have only the existing class dqv:QualityMeasureDataset (formerly known as daq:QualityGraph) or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-182 |
CLOSED |
The label of daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-183 |
CLOSED |
We may want to consider a revision of DCAT to make dcat:Dataset and dcat:Distribution subclasses of prov:Entity |
2015-06-12 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-184 |
CLOSED |
Is an dqv:ServiceLevelAgreement a kind of certificate, or a standard? |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-185 |
CLOSED |
dqv:QualityAnnotation modeling issues |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-186 |
CLOSED |
There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly. |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-187 |
CLOSED |
Do we want to keep the same occurrence constraints as defined in DAQ (for example, that every metric should belong to exactly one dimension)? |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-188 |
CLOSED |
Section "Express the quality of a linkset" will be completed by examples coming from Riccardo's work on measuring the quality of linksets between SKOS concept schemes |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-189 |
CLOSED |
Aether VoID extension uses a different from the pattern that DQV inherits from DAQ |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-190 |
CLOSED |
"official" DQV reqs vs the implementation of our best practices (cf. the "5 stars" thread). |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-191 |
CLOSED |
Backward compatibility with DAQ and Data Cube |
2015-06-12 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-192 |
CLOSED |
How to represent the relationship between a dataset and its different versions? Is PAV a good solution to track dataset versioning? |
2015-06-18 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-193
annette_g |
CLOSED |
Data Versioning |
2015-06-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-194
annette_g |
CLOSED |
Data Identification |
2015-06-19 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-195
annette_g |
CLOSED |
Provide data up to date |
2015-06-19 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-196
annette_g |
CLOSED |
Data enrichment |
2015-06-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-197
issues-github |
CLOSED |
Issue tracking and Github |
2015-08-14 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-198 |
CLOSED |
Consistency between Data Usage and Data Quality Vocabs |
2015-09-24 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-199 |
CLOSED |
Is dqv:QualityPolicy a subclass of dcterms:Standard? |
2015-09-24 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-200 |
CLOSED |
Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? |
2015-09-25 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-201
QualityAnnotations and motivations |
CLOSED |
Should we exploit predefined instances of oa:Motivation to further characterize the UserQualityFeedback purposes? |
2015-10-06 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-202 |
CLOSED |
Relation between dqv, iso 19115/19157 and geodcat-ap |
2015-10-09 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-203
UKURI |
CLOSED |
Status of UK URI design guidelines |
2015-10-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-204 |
CLOSED |
Introducing abstract classes and properties |
2015-10-19 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-205 |
CLOSED |
Representing dimensions and categories SKOS Concepts |
2015-10-19 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-206 |
CLOSED |
The example with memento needs to be rewritten to use the transport example |
2015-10-22 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-207 |
CLOSED |
Move BP Maintain separate versions for a data API to the Data Versioning section |
2015-11-06 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-208 |
CLOSED |
What to say about subsetting data, and identifying those subsets. this to be done in conjunction with sdw wg about this issue |
2015-11-06 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-209 |
CLOSED |
A definition for standardized term should be included in the glossary |
2015-11-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-210 |
CLOSED |
Code lists are used for describing metadata or data values? |
2015-11-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-211 |
CLOSED |
Should we be more explicit about the use of vocabularies? |
2015-11-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-212 |
CLOSED |
Should we use the term shared vocabulary instead of vocabulary? Should we use "Reuse Vocabularies" or "Use vocabularies" for the title of the BP? |
2015-11-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-213
BP_REST |
CLOSED |
Changes on BP about REST APIs |
2015-11-13 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-214 |
CLOSED |
prov:Agent vs duv:Agent |
2015-11-20 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-215 |
CLOSED |
duv:Publication versus foaf:Document |
2015-11-20 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-216 |
CLOSED |
duv:Rating as an instance of daq:Metric |
2015-11-20 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-217 |
CLOSED |
Review data usage model |
2015-11-20 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-218 |
CLOSED |
Level of detail sharing 3rd party vocabularies that can be used with DUV |
2015-11-20 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-219 |
CLOSED |
Tying DUV to Use Case requirements. |
2015-11-20 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-220 |
CLOSED |
Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? |
2015-12-03 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-221 |
CLOSED |
What is the importance of the alignment between hcls-dataset and dqv/duv? |
2015-12-04 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-222 |
CLOSED |
Multiple/Derived values of a metric |
2015-12-06 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-223 |
CLOSED |
Parameters for metrics |
2015-12-06 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-224 |
CLOSED |
Expected Data type for metrics |
2015-12-06 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-225 |
CLOSED |
Levels of granularity for dimensions and categories |
2015-12-06 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-226 |
CLOSED |
Should we remove the Reuse benefit? |
2015-12-08 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-227 |
CLOSED |
The document has three different indexes for the BP: by challenges, by benefits and the summary. Should we keep the three of them? |
2015-12-08 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-228 |
CLOSED |
Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Contextsection? |
2015-12-08 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-229 |
CLOSED |
Review requirements x BP |
2015-12-08 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-230 |
CLOSED |
Should we consider other BP benefits? |
2015-12-08 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-231
hasMetric |
CLOSED |
metric, hasMetric, something else |
2015-12-16 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-232
MyCity CSV files |
CLOSED |
Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example |
2015-12-18 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-233
Rest APIs |
CLOSED |
Amendments to BP: Use Web Standardized Interfaces |
2016-01-06 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-234 |
CLOSED |
Role of Usage Tool |
2016-01-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-235 |
CLOSED |
Namespaces in DUV |
2016-01-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-236 |
CLOSED |
agentClassification, usageClassification, skos:Concept |
2016-01-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-237 |
CLOSED |
Stability of http://vocab.org/review/terms.html#Feedback |
2016-01-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-238 |
CLOSED |
Should some of our properties be sub properties of a parent property? |
2016-01-19 |
Data Usage Vocabulary |
0 |
ISSUE-239
Laufer |
CLOSED |
machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats |
2016-02-17 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-240 |
CLOSED |
To consider a new bp around numeric accuracy. comes from sdw's concern about useless extra decmimal places |
2016-02-17 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-241 |
CLOSED |
Consider the granularity of data when providing an api. is the api necessary to every kind of data, is it only for small pieces of data, for huge datasets? |
2016-02-17 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-242
Laufer |
CLOSED |
APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices |
2016-02-18 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-243 |
CLOSED |
Representing precision and accuracy |
2016-03-07 |
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary |
0 |
| ISSUE-244 |
CLOSED |
Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits |
2016-03-10 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-245
summary-filter |
CLOSED |
To include filters in the summary to sort BPs according to Benefits or Challenges |
2016-03-13 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-246 |
CLOSED |
Find an alternative to make the Challenges' diagram bigger |
2016-03-13 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-247
dataset-discovery |
CLOSED |
How to test dataset discoverability? |
2016-03-13 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-248
feedback-reuse |
CLOSED |
To change the Feedback section to Data Reuse section. |
2016-03-14 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
ISSUE-249
fragment identifiers |
CLOSED |
Discussion about fragment identifiers |
2016-03-14 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-250 |
CLOSED |
Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? |
2016-03-14 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-251 |
CLOSED |
Open issues on Data Preservation Section |
2016-03-31 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-252 |
CLOSED |
Should we use Data Reuse or Data Usage as the title of Section 8.15 |
2016-04-07 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |
| ISSUE-253 |
CLOSED |
Use standardized terms x Reuse vocabularies |
2016-04-07 |
Best practices document(s) |
0 |