ISSUE-133: SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms
Standard metadata
SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Phil Archer
- Opened on:
- 2015-01-22
- Description:
- Editing the doc today, 22 Jan, the ProvideMetadataStandardized BP says "Use standard terms to describe metadata" which I have changed to "Use standard terms to provide" metadata (i.e. provide, not describe metadata).
But, is this is MUST or a SHOULD? (It's currently written as a SHOULD) - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: What is normative? (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-05-21)
- Re: What is normative? (from deirdre@derilinx.com on 2015-05-21)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's telco (from newton@nic.br on 2015-03-12)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)] (from laufer@globo.com on 2015-01-22)
- dwbp-ISSUE-133 (Standard metadata): SHOULD or MUST metadata be provided using standard terms [Best practices document(s)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-01-22)
Related notes:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: DWBP - Close Issues on RFC
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:31:33 -0300
From: Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
CC: yaso@nic.br <yaso@nic.br>, bfl@cin.ufpe.br, cburle@nic.br, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Hi Deirdre,
ISSUE-123
This Issue looks to be wrong categorized. I think Eric was referring to UCR Doc ([1] and [2]).
After reading the messages from Annette and Eric about this Issue, I think it could be closed and it’s necessary to change the document.
ISSUE-133
I think this issue can be closed. We will also close Issue 6 [3] of BP Doc, which says: “This issue could readily be applied to all BPs” and make the necessary changes in the document.
ISSUE-135
It can be closed.
Cheers,
Newton
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-SensitivePrivacy
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-SensitiveSecurity
[3]: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#h-issue6
> Em 07/04/2015, à(s) 20:04, Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Can you confirm that the following issues relating to RFC use have been addressed and can be closed?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/123
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/133
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/135
>
> Cheers,
> Deirdre
Deirdre Lee, 8 Apr 2015, 18:34:23
Display change log
