ISSUE-135: Use of RFC2119

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0188.html

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: DWBP - Close Issues on RFC
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 10:31:33 -0300
From: Newton Calegari <newton@nic.br>
To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
CC: yaso@nic.br <yaso@nic.br>, bfl@cin.ufpe.br, cburle@nic.br, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>


Hi Deirdre,

ISSUE-123
This Issue looks to be wrong categorized. I think Eric was referring to UCR Doc ([1] and [2]).
After reading the messages from Annette and Eric about this Issue, I think it could be closed and it’s necessary to change the document.

ISSUE-133
I think this issue can be closed. We will also close Issue 6 [3] of BP Doc, which says: “This issue could readily be applied to all BPs” and make the necessary changes in the document.

ISSUE-135
It can be closed.

Cheers,
Newton

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-SensitivePrivacy
[2]: http://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp-ucr/#R-SensitiveSecurity
[3]: http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#h-issue6
> Em 07/04/2015, à(s) 20:04, Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Can you confirm that the following issues relating to RFC use have been addressed and can be closed?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/123
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/133
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/135
>
> Cheers,
> Deirdre