ISSUE-138: Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in two?
Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in two?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Carlos Iglesias
- Opened on:
- 2015-01-22
- Description:
- more details: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Jan/0247.html
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats (from amgreiner@lbl.gov on 2015-08-12)
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats (from phila@w3.org on 2015-08-12)
- Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats (from phila@w3.org on 2015-08-12)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's telco (from newton@nic.br on 2015-03-12)
- dwbp-ISSUE-138 (BernadetteLoscio): Should we split Use machine-readable standardized data formats BP in two? [Best practices document(s)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-01-22)
Related notes:
The BP was divided in two.
Bernadette Farias Loscio, 26 Mar 2015, 16:30:34Display change log
