ISSUE-13: Improve Use case "Documented Support and Release of Data"
Improve Use case "Documented Support and Release of Data"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Phil Archer
- Opened on:
- 2014-06-03
- Description:
- UC Documented Support and Release of Data
I think the potential requirements should probably be removed since they point to solutions, not requirements. Yes, I presume we will highlight why dcterms:accrualPeriod etc. should be used but that's a solution to the requirement to release schedule metadata. I'm happy with the main text as is but it could be strengthened a little in the next version to give more substance to the requirement for an SLA. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: UCR Forked (from laufer@globo.com on 2014-10-02)
- UCR Forked (from phila@w3.org on 2014-10-02)
- Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13 (from phila@w3.org on 2014-10-02)
- Re: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13 (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-09-25)
- RE: W3C DWBP: Request to close Issue 13 (from Deirdre.Lee@deri.org on 2014-09-24)
- dwbp-ISSUE-13: Improve Use case #1 (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-06-03)
Related notes:
Potential requirements were removed from Use Case "Documented Support and Release of Data".
Bernadette Farias Loscio, 5 Jun 2014, 02:49:57Various edits have been made. The UC now points to R-AccessUptodate and R-SLAAvailable
Phil Archer, 2 Oct 2014, 12:32:12See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2014Oct/0027.html for closure
Phil Archer, 2 Oct 2014, 12:51:22Display change log
