ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2014-10-31
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from mail@makxdekkers.com on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-11-28)
- RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from mail@makxdekkers.com on 2014-11-28)
- RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from mail@makxdekkers.com on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from bfl@cin.ufpe.br on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl on 2014-11-28)
- Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2014-11-27)
- ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-10-31)
Related notes:
The group considered that versioning is in the scope of the document and BP for data versioning were included in the DWBP document.
Bernadette Farias Loscio, 26 Mar 2015, 16:12:20Display change log