RE: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

Bernadette,

 

Good point. In fact, an ontology is a type of dataset.

 

Makx.

 

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio [mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br] 
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 1:24 PM
To: Christophe Guéret
Cc: Ghislain Atemezing; public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

 

Hello Christophe,

 

I think it's gonna be easier if we don't make this difference. Then, in this case, we need to make clear that a resource may denote a dataset or a vocabulary. Do you agree?

 

Thanks,

Bernadette

 

2014-11-28 9:11 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl <mailto:christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl> >:

Hoi,

Do we really need to make the difference between data/metadata and datasets/vocabularies to speak about versioning ?

IMHO it would be best to just focus on versioning resource identifiers. Then a requirement on the design of identifiers to ensure they are version-proof would be sufficient.

Christophe

 

On 28 November 2014 at 13:00, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br <mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br> > wrote:

Hello Ghislain,

 

Thanks for adding one more use case and also for this dicussion about versioning!

 

In my opinion, versioning metadata should be provided both for datasets and vocabularies (ontologies). In the same way, it is important to have best practices for URI design that helps to deal with these different versions.

 

However, it is not clear for me if the new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*: “Data should have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of the dataset.”  concerns versions of both (datasets and vocabularies). 

 

Thanks!

Bernadette

 

2014-11-27 11:18 GMT-03:00 Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr <mailto:auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> >:

 

Dear Data-web-lovers,
[ My 2 cents to solve this issue... ]

ISSUE-69: Do we include versioning in the bp doc? currently there are no use cases for it

http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/69

I guess with the second round of UCs [1], we clearly identify that COMSODE's UC falls into versioning issue [2].

I've just added a new UC regarding BBC's ontologies, available here [3]. I was looking for a requirement dealing with designing URIs and versioning, to (maybe) make use of the COMURI document.

I've also proposed a new requirement *R-VersionURIDesign*?: “Data should have a canonical way to design URIs for different snapshot of the dataset.”

Maybe I didn't check enough the document to find overlaps with existing requirements. If so, please thanks for pointing the right requirement.

I hope these UCs will motivate the presence of including versioning in the bp document.

Best,
Ghislain

[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases
[2] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#Dataset_versioning_and_dataset_replication
[3] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Second-Round_Use_Cases#BBC_ontology_versioning_and_Metadata 


-- 
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr <mailto:auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>  & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com <mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com> 
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209300%208178> 
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209000%208200> 
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING
Twitter:@gatemezing





 

-- 

Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------





-- 

Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494 <tel:%2B31%280%296%2014576494> 
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl <mailto:christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl> 

 

Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op  <http://www.dans.knaw.nl> www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO.

 

Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres: 

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 |  <mailto:info@dans.kn> info@dans.knaw.nl | www.dans.knaw.nl <http://www.dans.knaw.nl> 

 

Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/


e-Humanities Group (KNAW)

 <http://www.ehumanities.nl/> 



 <http://www.ehumanities.nl/> -- 

 <http://www.ehumanities.nl/> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 28 November 2014 12:41:22 UTC