ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly.

There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly.

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Quality & Granularity Vocabulary
Raised by:
Antoine Isaac
Opened on:
2015-06-12
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: DQV: Proposal to solve ISSUE-186 (from nmihindu@fi.upm.es on 2015-09-11)
  2. DQV: Proposal to solve ISSUE-186 (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-09-06)
  3. dwbp-ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-06-12)

Related notes:

Resolution is:
[
Following the decision not to re-use DaQ classes directly, the idea is
- to keep the class dqv:QualityMeasure
- to declare it equivalent to daq:Observation
- to declare it as a subclass of qb:Observation (which daq:Observation is) [1]
[1] http://butterbur04.iai.uni-bonn.de/ontologies/daq/daq#Observation
]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Sep/0021.html

Antoine Isaac, 11 Sep 2015, 15:42:16

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 186.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:26:28 ted Exp $