ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly.
There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly.
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Quality & Granularity Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Antoine Isaac
- Opened on:
- 2015-06-12
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: DQV: Proposal to solve ISSUE-186 (from nmihindu@fi.upm.es on 2015-09-11)
- DQV: Proposal to solve ISSUE-186 (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2015-09-06)
- dwbp-ISSUE-186: There might be no need for a subclass link between dqv:QualityMeasure and daq:Observation. I.e., we could re-use daq:Observation directly. [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-06-12)
Related notes:
Resolution is:
[
Following the decision not to re-use DaQ classes directly, the idea is
- to keep the class dqv:QualityMeasure
- to declare it equivalent to daq:Observation
- to declare it as a subclass of qb:Observation (which daq:Observation is) [1]
[1] http://butterbur04.iai.uni-bonn.de/ontologies/daq/daq#Observation
]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015Sep/0021.html
Display change log