ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage

Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Data Usage Vocabulary
Raised by:
Makx Dekkers
Opened on:
2014-06-03
Description:
I don’t understand how R-Citable is a requirement for Data Usage. It’s much more general than that. And don’t URIs for data solve that requirement already? Or do you mean that something like DataCite https://www.datacite.org/ should be considered?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: UCR Forked (from laufer@globo.com on 2014-10-02)
  2. UCR Forked (from phila@w3.org on 2014-10-02)
  3. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (from phila@w3.org on 2014-10-02)
  4. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (from phila@w3.org on 2014-10-02)
  5. Updated UCR (from Deirdre.Lee@deri.org on 2014-08-29)
  6. RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (from Deirdre.Lee@deri.org on 2014-08-05)
  7. RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (from mail@makxdekkers.com on 2014-08-04)
  8. RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (from Deirdre.Lee@deri.org on 2014-08-04)
  9. dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-06-03)

Related notes:

Okay, could move R-Citable a general requirement
Datacite looks great; does it only apply to research data, or could it apply to any data on the web?

Deirdre Lee, 4 Aug 2014, 14:20:43

I moved the R-Citable requirement to the Metadata section. There is no 'general BP' section. I'm not sure it's any better there than where it was but, OK.

Phil Archer, 2 Oct 2014, 12:16:51

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 40.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:26:35 ted Exp $