- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 13:27:05 +0100
- To: "Lee, Deirdre" <Deirdre.Lee@deri.org>, Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>, "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Update... Actually, there's a section called Requirements for Data Identification - I've moved R-Citable to there. Phil On 02/10/2014 13:18, Phil Archer wrote: > I've moved R-Citable to the metadata section as I can't see a general > requirements section - is that better? > > It seems *slightly* more appropriate so I've closed the issue. Scream if > this is wrong. > > Phil > > On 05/08/2014 09:17, Lee, Deirdre wrote: >> A URI should be sufficient, if the data is described with metadata. >> Unless there was a case where an author wanted to cite not only the >> data source, but also how they used the data? But this is probably >> outside of our scope. >> >> In any case I agree we make R-Citable a general requirement, as >> opposed to a data usage requirement. Best practice around how this >> requirement is implemented can be discussed by Best Practice group. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Makx Dekkers [mailto:mail@makxdekkers.com] >> Sent: 04 August 2014 20:11 >> To: Lee, Deirdre; 'Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group' >> Subject: RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data >> Usage >> >> DataCite is indeed for research data but you could imagine similar >> schemes for other types of data. Not saying we should do this, just >> that I wondered whether R-Citable intended to be more than requiring >> that data gets a URI. >> >> Makx. >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Lee, Deirdre [mailto:Deirdre.Lee@deri.org] >>> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 4:39 PM >>> To: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group >>> Subject: RE: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data >>> Usage >>> >>> Okay, could move R-Citable a general requirement Datacite looks great; >>> does it only apply to research data, or could it apply to any data on >>> the web? >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker >>> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] >>> Sent: 03 June 2014 23:51 >>> To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org >>> Subject: dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data >>> Usage >>> >>> dwbp-ISSUE-40: Review R-Citable as a requirement for Data Usage >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/40 >>> >>> Raised by: Makx Dekkers >>> On product: >>> >>> I don’t understand how R-Citable is a requirement for Data Usage. It’s >>> much more general than that. And don’t URIs for data solve that >>> requirement already? Or do you mean that something like DataCite >>> https://www.datacite.org/ should be considered? >>> >>> >> >> > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2014 12:27:46 UTC