W3C Process CG Call
  • Past
  • Confirmed

Meeting

Event details

Date:
– Pacific Standard Time
Status:
Confirmed
Groups:
W3C Process Community Group ( View calendar)

Revising W3C Process: Examine the way W3C works. Propose improvements to the formal processes.

Usual meeting time: SECOND and FOURTH WEDNESDAY OF THE MONTH AT 7AM PACIFIC.

Agenda

Overall purpose: still trying to close down 2021

1 ) Assign scribe, etc.,

2 ) Agenda bash.

3 ) The Four Horsemen of the 2021 Process. Where are we, where are we going, and how do we get from here to there?

3.1) Tooling Policy. AB CfC has closed. https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/436

I think we can settle on

  • should for all except retention of records

  • must for retention of records

  • say, for the section “it is a responsibility of the team contact to ensure these rules are followed, and to bring any group not in compliance, into compliance, as soon as possible.”

  • say on the retention of records “The (temporary) lack of a backup does not, by itself, make a decision or revision invalid.”

    3.2) Recording meetings. see https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/334#issuecomment-793173149

    3.3) Registries. Florian has a pull for the base text and a separate commit for the separate publication.

    3.4) Separate track for Notes, in place, including W3C Statements. see https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/#note-track

4 ) Issues that the AC gave us last time we asked for a review; we should probably try to clean up?

https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/AC-review

5 ) Process 2021, The Milestone https://github.com/w3c/w3process/milestone/6 (long list)

P2021 Priority, shorter list https://github.com/w3c/w3process/labels/P2021%3A%20Priority

#130 on enumerating the requirements for Wide Review. Covered well enough, so close? See also https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/401

(all else is Registries etc. and covered elsewhere)

6 ) Other Pull Requests (other than agenda+, Needs AB Feedback, or a priority)

#299 Any decision can be objected to
#401 Proposes changes to wide/horizontal review; lots of discussion, what can we land?
#433 Simplify the text on liaisons. Does this go back to the AB, as it touches on members that are consortia (maybe they should be liaisons with a specific WG?)
#434 (face to face) Meetings of new groups are 8 weeks from charter approval
#485 possible missing link (editorial)

The usual closers:

7 ) Next meeting. 24 March

8 ) Any other business.

Minutes

 Read minutes

Export options

Personal Links

Please log in to export this event with all the information you have access to.

Public Links

The following links do not contain any sensitive information and can be shared publicly.

Feedback

Report feedback and issues on GitHub.