W3C | TAG |
previous |
this |
next
W3C TAG meeting 7-9 October 2012 in London, UK
Left to right: Larry Masinter, Jeni Tennison, Peter Linss, Yves Lafon, Noah Mendelsohn
Tim Berners-Lee, Henry Thompson, Ashok Malhotrav
Agenda Summary
Sunday, 7 October 2012 |
Agenda |
Minutes |
09:00-09:15 |
|
|
09:15-10:30 |
|
10:30-10:45 |
Break
|
10:45-11:45 |
|
11:45-13:00 |
Lunch
|
13:00-15:00 |
|
15:00-15:30 |
Break
|
15:30-16:00 |
|
16:00-16:30 |
|
16:30-17:00 |
|
Monday, 8 October 2012 |
Agenda |
Minutes |
09:00-10:20 |
|
|
10:20-10:50 |
Break
|
10:50-11:50 |
|
11:50-13:05 |
Lunch
|
13:05-15:20 |
|
15:20-15:50 |
Break
|
15:50-16:50 |
|
Tuesday, 9 October 2012 |
Agenda |
Minutes |
09:00-10:15 |
|
|
10:15-10:30 |
Break
|
10:30-12:00 |
|
12:00-13:15 |
Lunch
|
13:15-14:00 |
|
14:00-15:00 |
|
15:00-15:30 |
Privacy (needs an agenda item)
|
15:30-16:00 |
Break
|
16:00-16:45 |
TBD
|
16:45 |
ADJOURN
|
Logistics
- Venue
-
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
First Floor, The Davidson Building
5 Southampton Street London WC2E 7HA
Tel: +44 (0) 1793 417 666 | Fax: +44 (0) 1793 417 669
We are scheduled to meet in the Wilkes Room
all three days.
See logistics
for further details.
Required Reading
Agenda Details
- Convene, review agenda
- Scribes: TAG members are encouraged to sign up for scribing by using CVS to edit scribing assignments table, or by emailing the chair
- Roll call
- Regrets: Robin Berjon, Jonathan Rees
- Jonathan can attend by phone starting around 1:00 London time (8:00 US Eastern).
- Approve minutes of teleconferences:
- F2F Main Goals:
- Go to last call on Fragment Identifiers Recommendation
- Review comments on Publishing and Linking FPWD
- Set direction for documenting URI meaning (& httpRange-14)
- Meet w/Mark Nottingham to discuss HTTP 2.0 & URI scheme proliferation
- Identify new areas for TAG focus
- Review TAG Priorities for 2012 - 2013
- Goals:
- Remind ourselves of priorities and commitments from TAG product pages
- The Sunday session is primarily a quick level-set at the start of the
F2F — updates and debates about the priorities will happen
as we go along and in a session on Tuesdeay.
- Administration:
- Future TAG F2F meetings
- Choose location/dates for winter meeting
- Start thinking about location/dates for spring meeting
- TPAC (next item)
- TPAC Planning
- Note AB interest in meeting with TAG
- Larry Masinter suggests we think about Publishing and Linking for TPAC
- NOTE: Larry, Peter and Ashok will attend TPAC, Henry
is hoping to. Noah has a conflict and so will not.
- Group photo
- Upcoming TAG election and open seat: four TAG seats will be filled in the upcoming election.
Should the TAG do anything to facilitate a successful election (noting the unusually
large number of open positions, and thus the likely large impact on the TAG.)
- HTTP 2.0:
- IETF HTTP Bis Working Group chair Mark Nottingham will join us for this session
- Goal:
- Get update from Mark Nottingham on HTTP 2.0
- Decide whether TAG action is needed on HTTP futures
- Background:
- January 2012 F2F discussion with Mark Nottingham
- ACTION-682: on - Jonathan Rees - When HTTPbis group says time is right, suggest to TAG sections of HTTPbis specification that TAG should review - Due: 2012-10-06 - OPEN
- ACTION-733: on - Larry Masinter - prepare for 30 minute report on HTTP 2.0/SPDY at October 2012 F2F - Due: 2012-09-28 - OPEN
- Earlier background:
- URI scheme proliferation:
- Mark Nottingham will join us for this session
- Goal:
- Consider need for TAG focus on URI scheme proliferation
- registerProtocolHanlder, registerContentHandler, the "web+" URI scheme prefix"
- Background:
- Fragment identifier semantics:
- Product page: TAG Product: Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types
- TAG members assigned (as listed in product page): Jeni Tennison, Larry Masinter (offered to help on 3 May 2012), Henry Thompson, Yves Lafon (replacing Jonathan Rees as agreed at June 2011 F2F), Peter Linss (offered to help on 4 August 2011)
- Goals:
- Background:
- TAG Recommendation on Fragment IDS:
- RFC 3023bis and Fragment ID Semantics
- ACTION-689: on - Henry Thompson - work with Noah to draft a further request to the 3023bis editor from the TAG to include advice regarding what a particular +xml media type registration should do wrt fragid semantics along the lines in the discussion on media types and fragment identifiers at the f2f on 2012-04-04 - Due: 2012-10-01 - OPEN
- RFC 3023bis
regarding fragment ID semantics for +xml media types (required reading)
- Issue list for Jeff Jaffe:
- Goal:
- Start building list of issues to highlight for Jeff Jaffe
- Background:
- ACTION-563: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Arrange for periodic TAG key issues reports to Jeff per June 2011 F2F - Due: 2012-11-01 - OPEN
- Publishing and linking on the Web:
- TAG members assigned: Larry Masinter, Ashok Malhotra
- Goals:
- See also agenda item on governance
- Background:
- First Public Working Draft Publishing and Linking on the Web: W3C Working Draft 18 September 2012 (required reading)
- ACTION-732: on - Larry Masinter - prepare FPWD on Publishing and Linking - Due: 2012-09-05 - CLOSED
- ACTION-737: on - Yves Lafon - On Tuesday 4 Sept, if no objections, publish FPWD on Publishing and Linking - Due: 2012-09-06 - CLOSED
- ACTION-667: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Check, when publishing and linking wraps, whether it's time to reinvest in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/evolution/Registries.html - Due: 2012-07-15 - OPEN
- Architecture of the World Wide Semantic Web (AWWSW):
- Jonathan Rees requests 30 mins: review final report drafts and either accept them, or request
additional work (of Jonathan; the task group has disbanded).
- ACTION-201: on - Jonathan Rees - Report on status of AWWSW discussions - Due: 2012-10-02 - OPEN
- Governance Framework:
- Documenting meaning of individual IRIs (ISSUE-57):
- Offline applications:
- TAG member assigned: Ashok Malhotra
- Should we include web app / offline storage here?
- Goal:
- Decide whether to launch initiative on offline Web applications
- If so, prepare product page with goals, success criteria and dates.
- Determine objectives of any architectural work in this area
using
the Wed
Architecture objectives matrix as reference
- Clarify relationship to ACTION-717: on - Ashok Malhotra - Propose outline for possible TAG document (finding or rec) on architectural issues relating to storage sync, linked data, etc. Due 2012-07-15 - Due: 2012-10-10 - OPEN
- Background:
- Privacy (need to draft agenda item -- note Robin Berjon was responsible for work in this area
- TAG effectiveness:
-
TAG member assigned: Noah Mendelsohn
- Goals
- Background:
- Objectives matrix (required reading)
- ACTION-726: on - Jonathan Rees - Make a list of questions to which webarch and the findings suggest answers, as input to possible 'study design' and/or communication to chairs etc. - Due: 2012-09-17 - CLOSED
- Larry Masinter has suggested using the matrix for "outward facing purposes"
-
ACTION-725
on JT - progress ?
- Maybe: 10 minutes to talk about TAG issues list (this was JAR's
discussion-closing suggestion at an earlier F2F,
see ACTION-692: on - Noah Mendelsohn - consider JAR's april request to discuss, for 10 mins, issues list at oct f2f - Due: 2012-09-10 - OPEN, perhaps mooted by
objectives matrix)
- ACTION-709: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Talk to Jeff & W3M about TAG futures - Due: 2012-06-06 - CLOSED
- TAG Election Procedures
- Goals:
- Understand concerns that have been raised about TAG election procedures (followup to
discussion on 26 April 2012 teleconference)
- Decide what role, if any, it's appropriate for the TAG to play in addressing such concerns
- If based on the above considerations it's appropriate for the TAG to get involved, investigate the merits of the concerns raised, and decide on next steps
- Background:
- Robin Berjon has made proposals for "reforming" the TAG election process
- Discussion on 26 April 2012 teleconference
- ACTION-701: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Follow up with Robin on election reform - Due: 2012-08-01 - OPEN
- ACTION-702: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Follow up with Robin on election reform proposals - Due: 2012-05-03 - CLOSED
- The chair (Noah) has commented "...changes to
the W3C process are formally the responsibility of the AB, W3C management
and the AC. Normally, we don't discuss process issues on the TAG, except
when they affect our ability to do our technical work [...] Obviously, changing the processes relating to the TAG itself is a special
case, and I'm fine with scheduling some informal brainstorming". Larry raises a similar concern. The chair then wrote: "we will have a brief discussion of this on Thursday, and
we will do it with the understanding that any formal work on changing the
process is coordinated by the AB/Team/AC."
- See also extensive e-mail thread(s) with subject TAG productivity, elections, and httpRange-14 (but note that for discussion on 25 April, the chair intends to limit the scope to election reform, and not to broader questions of TAG findings, TAG effectiveness, etc.)
- Action item review:
- Open issue review:
- This is an optional agenda item: we'll do it if there's time
- Goal: review our list of open issues — look especially for issues that are open but dormant decide to assign resource/close/leave as background activity.
- Outplan:
- The following are potentially worth discussing, but are not formally
scheduled on the agenda:
- ACTION-669: on - Henry Thompson - Review http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#ref-define-practice and see whether TAG needs to do more on references to evolving specs Due: 2012-08-01 - Due: 2013-01-01 - OPEN
- polyglot (HT)
- HTML extension registry
(ACTION-672
on JT)
- privacy (NM?)
- scalability (PL)
- vendor prefixes (PL)
- ISSUE-50 if progress has been made (JAR, HT)
- ACTION-478: on - Jonathan Rees - Prepare a second draft of a finding on persistence of references, to be based on decision tree from Oct. 2010 F2F - Due: 2012-10-06 - OPEN
- ACTION-666: on - Henry Thompson - Update http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/persistence-2012-01-23.html to reflect agreement on 26 January telcon regarding settling at F2F - Due: 2012-09-01 - CLOSED (JAR commented: Have been making progress in background on what to do with this, based
on input from HT and LM, but not sure I'll have anything to discuss.)
Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
$Revision: 1.45 $ of $Date: 2012/10/25 02:19:00 $