W3C mailing list search service
Search among 2,319,439 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:
Closed: [i18n-activity] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- Date
- Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:24:58 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
r12a closed this issue. See https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/384
Re: [i18n-activity] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- Date
- Wed, 07 Feb 2018 17:34:18 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
[update] This is likely to be an obscure case, and I tend to agree that it doesn't need addressing at this point. I lodged an issue asking about this in the jlreq repo: https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/i
Re: [i18n-activity] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- Date
- Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:21:15 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Fantasai says: Closed on CSSWG side, but reasonable to remain open for i18n, but should result in a new issue being filed against CSSWG if changes are needed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12
Re: [i18n-activity] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- Date
- Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:34:48 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
This was accepted in the doc https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-10 -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/i1
[i18n-activity] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- Date
- Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:33:52 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
r12a has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity: == Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text == https://www.w3.org/Mail/flatten/index?subject=Orientation+of+emphasis
Re: [css-text-decor] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:02:05 +0330
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
I think the correct answer, given that even ideographic characters are sideways, is that the emphasis marks are also sideways. We can make this optional for conformance in this level, if it is an imp
Re: [css-text-decor] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:27:05 +1100
- Author
- Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
It seems to me always remaining upright costs less code for us. If there is no real use cases, I guess it's fine to leave it undefined for now, but we probably should at least state in the spec expli
Re: [css-text-decor] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:15:20 +0900
- Author
- Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Good point, thank you. There's no real use cases however, so I'm fine to leave it undefined. For Blink, though Blink doesn't support sideways-* as of today, upright is easier to implement. But we hav
[css-text-decor] Orientation of emphasis marks for sideways text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Sat, 21 Nov 2015 17:31:34 +1100
- Author
- Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
There is a question that, should the emphasis marks remain upright even when using sideways-* writing modes or specifying sideways orientation? This should be clarified in the spec whatever the answe
Help and hints for using this service
W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.