W3C mailing list search service
Search among 2,335,229 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:
Closed: [i18n-activity] Emphasis marks and font variant
- Date
- Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:26:16 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
r12a closed this issue. See https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/386
Re: [i18n-activity] Emphasis marks and font variant
- Date
- Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:29:33 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
This was closed on the CSSWG end. Fantasai can't find any reason for it to remain open on i18n end. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w
Re: [i18n-activity] Emphasis marks and font variant
- Date
- Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:40:57 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The doc marks as Accepted https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-13 -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/i18n-
[i18n-activity] Emphasis marks and font variant
- Date
- Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:40:44 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
r12a has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity: == Emphasis marks and font variant == https://www.w3.org/Mail/flatten/index?subject=Emphasis+marks+and+font+variant&list=ww
Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:36:27 +0000
- Author
- Ken Lunde <lunde@adobe.com>
Looks good.
Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:34:58 +0330
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Thanks for the info! I've updated to apply 'ruby' as you recommend, and will run it by the WG for the next publication. The spec now reads ~fantasai
Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:33:24 +0000
- Author
- Ken Lunde <lunde@adobe.com>
Elika, John is no longer at Mozilla, so I am resending with his other email address. Best... -- Ken
Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:27:14 +0000
- Author
- Ken Lunde <lunde@adobe.com>
Elika, Two things should happen when applying the 'ruby' GSUB feature. One is to get the substituted glyphs, which are specifically tuned for ruby use. For some fonts, such as Adobe-Japan1-4 and grea
Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:18:03 +0330
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Hello Ken and John, Xidorn raised an interesting question: when rendering emphasis marks (bouten) using a given font, should the OpenType 'ruby' feature be activated? (There is no way in CSS to assig
Re: [css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:22:10 +1100
- Author
- Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Actually, applying the font variant conflicts with the sentence in text-emphasis-style section: - Xidorn
[css-text-decor] Emphasis marks and font variant
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:25:08 +1100
- Author
- Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
And in CSS Ruby Layout module, there is rule in UA sheet: "font-variant-east-asian: ruby;". Should this font variant also be applied to the emphasis marks? The current spec seems to answer yes uninte
Help and hints for using this service
W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.