W3C mailing list search service
Search among 2,283,821 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:
Closed: [i18n-activity] i18n-ISSUE-359: Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value (#98)
- Date
- Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:59:00 +0000
- Author
- Addison Phillips via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] i18n-ISSUE-359: Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value (#98)
- Date
- Fri, 05 Feb 2021 17:43:39 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:01:59 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
presented as mono ruby with the phonetics centered per character, or as word-based ruby where the phonetics are centered per word. presumably this would only work if you considered that eventuality i
Re: Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:01:59 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
presented as mono ruby with the phonetics centered per character, or as word-based ruby where the phonetics are centered per word. presumably this would only work if you considered that eventuality i
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:38:14 -0700
- Author
- "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Hmm, I see. I was under the impression that jukugo was the "word" mode; I didn't realize it was actually "mono, but allow overlap if necessary". I definitely see how the "word" mode is necessary for
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:38:14 -0700
- Author
- "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Hmm, I see. I was under the impression that jukugo was the "word" mode; I didn't realize it was actually "mono, but allow overlap if necessary". I definitely see how the "word" mode is necessary for
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:36:34 -0400
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
It's not, see Koji's reply. Jukugo and the sort of collapsing I'm describing for Latin phonetics are not the same. We basically need three values, in order of priority, for ruby-merge: 1. syllable ru
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:36:34 -0400
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
It's not, see Koji's reply. Jukugo and the sort of collapsing I'm describing for Latin phonetics are not the same. We basically need three values, in order of priority, for ruby-merge: 1. syllable ru
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:05:21 +0900
- Author
- Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 1 Oct 2015 19:05:21 +0900
- Author
- Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:06:39 -0700
- Author
- "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:06:39 -0700
- Author
- "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:02:43 -0400
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Re: i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:02:43 -0400
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- Date
- Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:51:37 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/TR/css-ruby-1/#collapsed-ruby 4.2 Sharing Annotation Space: the ruby-merge property I think the new ruby-merge property in the editor's draft is overthinking the task. If people wan
i18n-ISSUE-359: [css-ruby] Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:51:37 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/TR/css-ruby-1/#collapsed-ruby 4.2 Sharing Annotation Space: the ruby-merge property I think the new ruby-merge property in the editor's draft is overthinking the task. If people wan
I18N-ISSUE-359: Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value [css-ruby]
- List
- public-i18n-core
- Date
- Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:53:28 +0000
- Author
- "Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
I18N-ISSUE-359: Drop ruby-merge in favour of a specific jukugo value [css-ruby] http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/359 Raised by: Richard Ishida On product: css-ruby I think the new ruby-me
Help and hints for using this service
W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.