W3C mailing list search service
Search among 2,289,340 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:
Closed: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:23:01 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:49:32 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:19:40 +0000
- Author
- fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:47:01 +0000
- Author
- fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:04:17 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:02:38 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:57:55 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:49:47 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
[i18n-activity] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:49:24 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
[csswg-drafts] [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- Date
- Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:52:19 +0000
- Author
- r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Tue, 7 Feb 2017 16:46:58 -0500
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:13:49 -0500
- Author
- Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Le 2017-02-07 14:51, fantasai a écrit : Elika, Maybe this reply is not perfectly on topic... but anyways... While developing a test [1] on text-shadow, I stumbled on the difficulty of figuring out
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:51:39 -0500
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Someone being like, "I want to make a page that looks like X and it's not possible with CSS today", where X is a realistic thing someone would want to do rather than a mere thought experiment. It doe
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:10:30 -0800
- Author
- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Hi fantasai, I have filed https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/240 Can you provide (privately if you prefer) what the WG considers a "use-case-backed request"? Thanks, -- Pierre On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:03:47 -0500
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
The key thing to realize is that the "before" side and the "over" side do not coincide in Mongolian writing. See https://www.w3.org/TR/css-writing-modes-3/#text-flow If there's a demand for it on the
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:58:38 -0800
- Author
- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Hi fantasai, Thanks for the feedback! Ok. I can file an issue against TTML2. Any additional detail on "handles Mongolian better"? [ed.: I am not a Mongolian expert] Unless the document to which CSS i
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:55:49 -0500
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
'over' and 'under' also take into account the 'writing-mode', except they do so in a way that handles Mongolian better. The case of "only two lines" isn't really a significant consideration in CSS-ba
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:10:15 -0800
- Author
- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Hi fantasai et al., I see the following issues: - the problem statement below indicates "[over/under/left/right] is redundant and painful for authors". Doesn't 'before' and 'after' solve this issue s
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:25:55 -0500
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
I think you should file that issue against TTML2. Its earliest working draft is two years later than the Candidate Recommendation of CSS Text Decoration Level 3. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-css-tex
Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:01:43 -0800
- Author
- Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Hi all, Have you considered the proposed emphasis positions specified in TTML2 WD? https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/#style-value-emphasis-position 'before' and 'after' are used instead of combinations of
Help and hints for using this service
W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.