W3C mailing list search service
Search among 2,304,163 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:05:11 -0700
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Hmm. Looks like the spec postprocessor is choking on something. Should be worked around now (and I'll need to file a bug). Okay, done. Also did a bit of related cleanup. Right. Appears to also be a b
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:05:11 -0700
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Hmm. Looks like the spec postprocessor is choking on something. Should be worked around now (and I'll need to file a bug). Okay, done. Also did a bit of related cleanup. Right. Appears to also be a b
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:46:38 -0700
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Fixed. ~fantasai
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:46:38 -0700
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Fixed. ~fantasai
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:39:04 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Much better. Thanks. I think it's ok, thanks. However the indent after the first line of those paragraphs looks a bit odd to me - was it intentional? I think i'd also make the explanatory text propor
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:39:04 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Much better. Thanks. I think it's ok, thanks. However the indent after the first line of those paragraphs looks a bit odd to me - was it intentional? I think i'd also make the explanatory text propor
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:11:12 +0000
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Just looked at the latest CR draft http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20140320/ I think that the CSS in example 2: /* Rules for bidi */ [dir=ltr] {direction: rtl;} [dir=rtl] {direction:
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:11:12 +0000
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Just looked at the latest CR draft http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20140320/ I think that the CSS in example 2: /* Rules for bidi */ [dir=ltr] {direction: rtl;} [dir=rtl] {direction:
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:50:34 +0100
- Author
- Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Hi Elika, I think that it would be better to use XML and not SGML for DocBook example. Almost noone is using SGML version of DocBook now, except for few legacy projects. So changing SGML->XML and put
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:50:34 +0100
- Author
- Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Hi Elika, I think that it would be better to use XML and not SGML for DocBook example. Almost noone is using SGML version of DocBook now, except for few legacy projects. So changing SGML->XML and put
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:35:50 -0800
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
I switched the example to use DocBook. Take a look and let me know if it's good? Not sure I handled this part as you want; I think you want me to adjust the prose somehow? I think it's not that impor
Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:35:50 -0800
- Author
- fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
I switched the example to use DocBook. Take a look and let me know if it's good? Not sure I handled this part as you want; I think you want me to adjust the prose somehow? I think it's not that impor
[css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Date
- Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:01:43 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Example of Bidirectional Text http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/#bidi-example I've been meaning to say for some years now that this is a very bad example. It should use dedicated bidi specif
[css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- List
- www-style
- Date
- Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:01:43 +0100
- Author
- Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Example of Bidirectional Text http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/#bidi-example I've been meaning to say for some years now that this is a very bad example. It should use dedicated bidi specif
I18N-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text [.prep-CSS3-writing-modes]
- Date
- Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:00:23 +0000
- Author
- Internationalization Core Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
I18N-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text [.prep-CSS3-writing-modes] http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/167 Raised by: Richard Ishida On product: .prep-CSS3-writing-modes Example of Bid
Help and hints for using this service
W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.