W3C mailing list search service

Search among 2,304,220 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:

This is page 1, displaying results 1-17 of 17

Closed: [i18n-activity] Justifying Korean text (#95)

Date
Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:17:32 +0000
Author
r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>

r12a closed this issue. See https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues/95 -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Re: [i18n-activity] Justifying Korean text (#95)

Date
Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:02:15 +0000
Author
r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I agree that this is more of a question for klreq (which didn't have a repo at that time). I pointed to the thread from https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/12, and propose that we close this issue. -

Re: [i18n-activity] Justifying Korean text (#95)

Date
Wed, 06 May 2020 05:08:57 +0000
Author
Fuqiao Xue via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I think this should be a klreq issue instead of a css-text issue (although the results of the issue may have an effect on css-text)? -- GitHub Notification of comment by xfq Please view or discuss th

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:23:52 +0000
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>

Thank you for the reply Dongwoo, and sorry for my late response. Latin letters can mix into any of these and don’t cause conflicts, so I guess we don’t have to differentiate it. So it’s 1:20:80 if #3

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:23:52 +0000
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>

Thank you for the reply Dongwoo, and sorry for my late response. Latin letters can mix into any of these and don’t cause conflicts, so I guess we don’t have to differentiate it. So it’s 1:20:80 if #3

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:55:50 +0000
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>

Thank you for the information and sorry for my very late reply. Korean Language use two character type that Chinese Character and Korean Character(Hangul) And I think your first Question¡¯s answer is

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:55:50 +0000
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>

Thank you for the information and sorry for my very late reply. Korean Language use two character type that Chinese Character and Korean Character(Hangul) And I think your first Question¡¯s answer is

RE: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:46:01 +0900
Author
Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>

Hi! Koji. Thanks a lot for your questions about Korean use cases! Unfortunately I am too busy these days, so I will get back to you later, probably until next week. Kr, Wonsuk.

RE: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:46:01 +0900
Author
Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>

Hi! Koji. Thanks a lot for your questions about Korean use cases! Unfortunately I am too busy these days, so I will get back to you later, probably until next week. Kr, Wonsuk.

I18N-ISSUE-383: Justifying Korean text ⓣ [css-text]

Date
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:38:10 +0000
Author
"Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

I18N-ISSUE-383: Justifying Korean text â“£ [css-text] http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/383 Raised by: Richard Ishida On product: css-text Thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/publi

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:34:53 -0700
Author
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

I think that if there are no spaces (or too few spaces) in a line, inter-ideographic spacing should be allowed unless text-justify is explicitly set to inter-word. That would take care of this case.

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:34:53 -0700
Author
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

I think that if there are no spaces (or too few spaces) in a line, inter-ideographic spacing should be allowed unless text-justify is explicitly set to inter-word. That would take care of this case.

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 20:50:27 +1000
Author
Andrew Cunningham <lang.support@gmail.com>

wrong this is to you; are ancient documents considered as Chinese, or are they ancient Korean? I’m guessing this is wrong, but just wanted to ask. I’m sorry if this is really a bad, impolite ques

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 20:50:27 +1000
Author
Andrew Cunningham <lang.support@gmail.com>

wrong this is to you; are ancient documents considered as Chinese, or are they ancient Korean? I’m guessing this is wrong, but just wanted to ask. I’m sorry if this is really a bad, impolite ques

Re: [css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Wed, 9 Jul 2014 18:36:37 +0900
Author
glados <apes0123@gmail.com>

Hello. Korean Language use two character type that Chinese Character and Korean Character(Hangul) And I think your first Question¡¯s answer is correct. There are Three documents represent Korean Lang

[css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Tue, 8 Jul 2014 02:58:53 +0000
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>

Hello/안녕하세요 Could someone please help us to discuss what’s right for justifying Korean text? This is a bit long e-mail, sorry for not being able to write in short. Here’s a background.

[css-text] Justifying Korean text

Date
Tue, 8 Jul 2014 02:58:53 +0000
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>

Hello/안녕하세요 Could someone please help us to discuss what’s right for justifying Korean text? This is a bit long e-mail, sorry for not being able to write in short. Here’s a background.

Help and hints for using this service

W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.