W3C mailing list search service

Search among 2,283,255 messages in the W3C mailing list archives:

This is page 1, displaying results 1-20 of 44

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:11:56 -0400
Author
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

Just to close on this, the CSSWG resolved to accept the proposal in http://www.w3.org/mid/55982414.1080905@inkedblade.net See minutes at http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u8Kc4qiW+bxQw3Eyq6Uu1=RFxSeCWCdSZ

Re: [css-writing-modes] proposed writing-mode: sideways-left and text-orientation: sideways

Date
Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:05:40 -0400
Author
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

This has been updated as follows: * sideways is defined as 90deg clockwise rotation always * sideways-right has been dropped; UAs may parse and compute it to sideways ~fantasai

I18N-ISSUE-490: writing-mode: sideways-left [css-writing-modes]

Date
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:21:00 +0000
Author
"Internationalization Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>

I18N-ISSUE-490: writing-mode: sideways-left [css-writing-modes] http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/490 Raised by: Richard Ishida On product: css-writing-modes THREAD: http://www.w3.org/Mail

Re: [css-writing-modes] proposed writing-mode: sideways-left and text-orientation: sideways

Date
Sat, 22 Aug 2015 00:16:32 +0900
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>

Agreed, and I think Jonathan agreed on this point before too. /koji

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:43:35 +0100
Author
Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>

i think it's incorrect to assume that 99% of the writing-mode users want to write in CJK characters. At the beginning of this discussion i was trying to write an article for content authors about how

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:51:52 +0100
Author
Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>

This is correct; if the new sideways-* values for writing-mode are added, this has no effect whatsoever on existing usage of the vertical-* values. Japanese users can ignore the new values, which are

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:50:22 +0900
Author
Hiroshi Sakakibara <sakakibara.hiroshi@bpsinc.jp>

My company's developer says, the implementation becomes easy. But since we haven't met the situation to use the sideways-left, the priority to develop it is not so much high. (For example if we need

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:39:43 +0900
Author
Hiroshi Sakakibara <sakakibara.hiroshi@bpsinc.jp>

My company, BPS co. LTD., is developing an EPUB3 viewer, Cho-Tate-Gaki (it means super vertiacl layout), based on Blink. As the name tells, we did lots of modifications for Blink for beautiful Japan

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:13:11 +0200
Author
Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>

Re: [css-writing-modes] proposed writing-mode: sideways-left and text-orientation: sideways

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:01:52 -0700
Author
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

This makes sense to me. ~fantasai

[css-writing-modes] proposed writing-mode: sideways-left and text-orientation: sideways

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:48:25 +0900
Author
John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>

If 'sideways-lr' and 'sideways-rl' are added to 'writing-mode', I think the definition of 'text-orientation: sideways' needs to be updated also to always imply 'sideways-right'. John Daggett Mozilla

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:32:36 +0900
Author
John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:19:06 +0200
Author
Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:03:10 +0900
Author
Shinyu Murakami <murakami@vivliostyle.com>

I agree with you except the last one. I think sideways-lr and sideways-rl are better than rotated-left and rotated-right, because consistent with vertical-lr/rl where lr/rl indicates the line stackin

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:23:10 +0100
Author
Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>

I don't agree that the proposal being considered here would increase authoring model complexity. If anything, I'd say it offers authors a cleaner and more understandable model. We'd have three modes

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:12:21 +0900
Author
John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:51:09 +0900
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>

+jdaggett Are you good with the proposal? /koji

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:03:29 +0200
Author
Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:11:18 +0900
Author
Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>

I'm good, and no objections doesn't seem to be seen on this ML so far. Can we say this is resolved now? [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0051.html /koji

Re: [css-writing-modes] Propose writing-mode: sideways-left

Date
Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:02:04 -0400
Author
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

Sorry, it's the old name for the vrtr feature: http://blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2013/08/tale-of-three-features.html ~fantasai

Help and hints for using this service

W3C Member? Check the Member-only interface. W3C staff? Use the Team-only interface.