Information

Content Authenticity and the Web
  • Past
  • Confirmed
  • Breakout Sessions

Meeting

Event details

Date:
Pacific Daylight Time
Status:
Confirmed
Location:
4 Concourse Level - Redondo
Participants:
Ryosuke Abe, Mustaq Ahmed, Qing An, Daniel Appelquist, Panos Astithas, Matthew Atkinson, Kenji Baheux, Louay Bassbouss, Bert Bos, Tim Cappalli, Tantek Çelik, Pamela Dingle, Hiroki Endo, Nikos Fotiou, Scott Haseley, Ivan Herman, Ian Jacobs, Iris Johnson, Jesse Jurman, Jay Kishigami, Mirja Kühlewind, Wonsuk Lee, Sandor Major, Ryuichi Matsukura, Matthew Miller, Mark Nottingham, James Nurthen, Gerald Oskoboiny, Wendy Reid, John Riviello, Vincent Scheib, Naomi Schoppa, Tzviya Siegman, David Singer, Ted Thibodeau Jr, Kouhei Ueno, David Waite, Anna Weine, Noreen Whysel, Chris Wilson, Frankie Wolf, Rachel Yager, Benjamin Young
Big meeting:
TPAC 2024 (Calendar)

Goal of the session: Understand user needs around provenance and authenticity of content on the Web and their intersections with W3C work, towards a possible W3C Workshop in 2025.

One of the major threats the Web is facing is its use as a large-scale vector or mis- and disinformation, made even more prominent by the rise of generative AI which allows the production of synthetic superficially-credible content.

To understand what role W3C might play in mitigating that threat, discussions around a possible Authentic Web workshop sometime in 2025 have emerged in the community.

This breakout offers to discuss how we can better allow end users to determine the authenticity of the information they see when they use the web, as a first step towards identifying a relevant scope for such a workshop.

The Ethical Web Principles state: “The web makes it possible to verify information”. There are technologies being developed such as C2PA or OP (Originator Profile) which allow for stronger binding of metadata to content of various kinds. What can the web do better to surface this kind of metadata to end users and ensure that this metadata is maintained across various methods of content transfer?

The breakout will focus on the user needs - specifically thinking of web users (both as content creators and consumers), informed by current best practice thinking in the relevant industries (for example, journalism, fact checking).

Agenda

Chairs:
Daniel Appelquist

Description:
Goal of the session: Understand user needs around provenance and authenticity of content on the Web and their intersections with W3C work, towards a possible W3C Workshop in 2025.

One of the major threats the Web is facing is its use as a large-scale vector or mis- and disinformation, made even more prominent by the rise of generative AI which allows the production of synthetic superficially-credible content.

To understand what role W3C might play in mitigating that threat, discussions around a possible Authentic Web workshop sometime in 2025 have emerged in the community.

This breakout offers to discuss how we can better allow end users to determine the authenticity of the information they see when they use the web, as a first step towards identifying a relevant scope for such a workshop.

The Ethical Web Principles state: “The web makes it possible to verify information”. There are technologies being developed such as C2PA or OP (Originator Profile) which allow for stronger binding of metadata to content of various kinds. What can the web do better to surface this kind of metadata to end users and ensure that this metadata is maintained across various methods of content transfer?

The breakout will focus on the user needs - specifically thinking of web users (both as content creators and consumers), informed by current best practice thinking in the relevant industries (for example, journalism, fact checking).

Goal(s):
Refine plan for a 2025 workshop on web authenticity.

Agenda:
Format: Short presentations followed by discussion

Materials:

Export options

Personal Links

Please log in to export this event with all the information you have access to.

Public Links

The following links do not contain any sensitive information and can be shared publicly.

Feedback

Report feedback and issues on GitHub.