W3C | TAG |
Previous: 7 February 2013
This: 14 February 2013
Next: 21 February 2013
Agenda of 14 February 2013 TAG Teleconference
Nearby: TAG work plan - Teleconference
details - issues list - open actions - pending review actions - www-tag archive - tag archive
- Convene
- Chair: Noah Mendelsohn, Scribe: Jeni Tennison (unconfirmed)
- Regrets: Tim Berners-Lee, Anne van Kesteren, Peter Linss, Marcos Caceres, Yves Lafon
- Future regrets: 28 February Tim Berners-Lee
- Agenda Review - this agenda
- Next Meeting: 21 February, 2013, Chair: Noah Mendelsohn
- Future scribes: Jeni Tennison -> Yves Lafon -> Henry Thompson
- Approve minutes of prior meeting(s)
- Administrative items
- Polyglot and DOM support of XML
- Goals:
- Clarify path to a decision on what approach, if any, the TAG wishes to advocate (stated differently: decide whether and why we might reconsider the path the TAG has advocated to date).
- Background:
- Request from Alex Russell for discussion on this call. From his email: I'd like to
understand what our collective options are for making a decision; also come
to at least a timeframe for whatever decision we need to make.
- 24 January 2012 discussion of DOM support for XML (part 1, part 2)
- Fragment identifier semantics:
- Product page: TAG Product: Fragment Identifiers and Mime Types
- TAG members assigned (as listed in product page): Jeni Tennison, Larry Masinter (outgoing), Henry Thompson, Yves Lafon (replacing Jonathan Rees as agreed at June 2011 F2F), Peter Linss (outgoing)
- Goals:
- Background:
- Last call working draft: Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions (Editor's draft of 5 January 2013)
- ACTION-772: on - Jeni Tennison - With help from Larry to propose CR exit criteria for fragids finding - Due: 2013-02-12 - OPEN
- ACTION-777: on - Jeni Tennison - Draft proposed response to Richard Cyganiak's comments on Fragids - Due: 2013-01-10 - PENDING REVIEW
- E-mail from Alex Russell requesting discussion this week:
- Alex writes: Jeni and I were able to discuss this off-list
last week and I feel as though the TAG could make note about this that
contains architectural guidance in both the XML/RDF area and the HTML in a
way way that can make everyone happy.
- Jeni responds
- RFC 3023bis and Fragment ID Semantics
- ACTION-689: on - Henry Thompson - work with Noah to draft a further request to the 3023bis editor from the TAG to include advice regarding what a particular +xml media type registration should do wrt fragid semantics along the lines in the discussion on media types and fragment identifiers at the f2f on 2012-04-04 - Due: 2012-10-01 - CLOSED
- RFC 3023bis
regarding fragment ID semantics for +xml media types
- F2F Planning
- Pending Review Items:
- Pending review actions in Tracker
- Note especially: ACTION-746: on - Jeni Tennison - Raise a bug on registerContentHandler and registerProtocolHandler to ask for specification of how fragids are handled - Due: 2012-10-30 - PENDING REVIEW (in e-mail Larry Masinter says of this: "I owe Jeni a reply. I could try to answer on the call tomorrow.")
- Overdue Action Items:
- Any other business
Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
$Revision: 1.10 $ of $Date: 2013/04/04 03:18:42 $