I just launched a Kickstater project that might be of interest. The short form is "smart documents," running in browsers as webapps, that talk to each other via P2P protocols - as a tool for keeping virtual teams and projects "on the same page." Model is browser-resident pages that communicate via a P2P protocol - so seems relevant to this group.
I encourage you to take a look at
and if you're so moved, get on board.
A bit more background:
For about 40 years my "thing" has always been the theory and practice of using the Internet to support virtual organizations. I've scratched this itch by working on everything from C2 systems and distributed simulation, to electronic town meetings, online rulemakings, and webmarkets.
I've continued to find that the simplest tools seem to be the most effective - particularly email lists, and various forms of shared/synchronized documents, both on paper (musical scores, theatrical scripts) and electronic (RFCs, linked spreadsheets, military mission orders distributed by email).
This project represents a distillation of a lot of ideas about how to support virtual projects and teams with "smart documents." It started out as some funded work on "smart op orders" that I'm trying to generalize as an open source tools. I'm nominally calling them "smart notebooks" - and the core idea is "keeping people on the same page, across the net."
Think of a composer, writing some music, then handing out pages to orchestra members, then telling people to mark up their pages - then think about writing in a web browser, distributing by email, and linking the pages so markups propagate automatically. Functionally, I've been thinking of the tool as a cross between a DayRunner on steroids, and HyperCard, retooled for groups, running in a browser. No new tools to install, no fancy groupware running in the cloud - just web apps executing locally, email, and a P2P protocol.
If you can help spread the word - by reposting/retweeting/slashdotting/putting and so forth - that would really be helpful. If you know anybody at Wired or Gizmodo, that would also be helpful (seems like coverage by one of those is a really good vehicle to successful Kickstarter funding).
If you have a project coming up that needs tools for supporting a distributed effort - say a large crowdsourcing project, or organizing a large event - I'm looking for scenarios to support - particuarly if you're funded
And there's a 30-day clock running, so sooner is better!
Thank you very much for any support you might offer,
Summary Awesome scenes in July as one of our members opened the Olympic Games. Incredible to see millions of people around the globe paying credit to way the Web has changed everyone’s lives. Growing pains experienced in two important specs: … Continue reading
Hi all, The expressiveness of OWL Manchester Syntax (omn) is limited compared to other OWL2 syntaxes. For example, it is not possible to express GCIs in omn. I would like to extend omn so that is has the expressiveness of … Continue reading
At the group meeting yesterday, it was decided to have a 2 week review period (ending August 6) of the current draft, after which all comments will be addressed and a final version will be created for publishing. We will … Continue reading
On 2012-07-23 the EXPath Community Group published the first draft of the following specification: File Module. Participants contribute material to this specification under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA). If you have any questions, please contact the group on … Continue reading
W3C has launched the Mobile Accessibility Community Group The mission of this group is the discussion and investigation of the intersection of mobile and accessibility. A place to discuss emerging efforts, document needs and requirements and investigate emergent techniques and … Continue reading
The Mobile Accessibility Community Group has been proposed by John Foliot: Discussion and investigation of the intersection of mobile and accessibility. A place to discuss emerging efforts, document needs and requirements and investigate emergent techniques and best practices. You are … Continue reading
On 2012-07-18 the EXPath Community Group published the first draft of the following specification: Packaging System. Participants contribute material to this specification under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA). If you have any questions, please contact the group on … Continue reading
On 16 July 2012 09:27, Michael Kay wrote: On 14/06/2012 01:09, Christian Grün wrote:
a new version of the File Module is online:
I've just returned to my uncompleted implementation and test suite for this module (the test suite is a lot more work than the implementation...).
I'm hitting problems knowing what to do about BOMs. Under what circumstances should a BOM be written?
Should they be used only with UTF-16, or also with UTF-8?
Should they be written only at the start of the file (i.e. append-X functions have to check whether the file is empty in order to decide whether to write a BOM?)
Apparently the first order of business is to choose chairs, and this is done by going to the member page and checking boxes next to the people who are to become chairs. I’ll just provide a pointer to the MicroXML … Continue reading