Important note: This Wiki page is edited by participants of the EOWG. It does not necessarily represent consensus and it may have incorrect information or information that is not supported by other Working Group participants, WAI, or W3C. It may also have some very useful information.
EOWG Charter 2017 Additional Information
This page has information related to the EOWG Charter 2017.
- 1 Organization Statements
- 2 Q&A
- 2.1 Track record in getting work done?
- 2.2 What real world impact the work being proposed has had in the past? Testimonials from consumers of the work...
- 2.3 Active participants and engagement in the work?
- 2.4 Who has been actively engaged in the charter preparatory work?
- 2.5 What success indicators we can track going forward to assess whether the WG has done what it set out to do.
- 2.6 Why is this being proposed as a Working Group?
- 3 Analysis of Working Group, Interest Group, Community Group
- 4 Staff Support and External Funding
- 5 W3C Member and Community Use of EOWG Resources
- 5.1 Examples of EOWG resource use by community
- 5.2 Resource specific testimonials
- 5.2.1 How to Meet WCAG 2.0: Customizable Quick Reference
- 5.2.2 Easy Checks - A First Review of Web Accessibility
- 5.2.3 How People with Disabilities Use the Web
- 5.2.4 Tutorials
- 5.2.5 Tips for Getting Started with Web Accessibility
- 5.2.6 WCAG-EM Report Tool: Website Accessibility Evaluation Report Generator
- 5.2.7 Business Case
- 5.2.8 How to Make Presentations Accessible to All
- 5.2.9 Web Accessibility Perspectives
- 5.2.10 General
- 5.3 All Tweets
(The following are posted a public page with permission.)
- W3C Member: Yahoo! — Mike Shebanek, Senior Director, Accessibility
Thank you for requesting input on EOWG's new charter. Here are some thoughts and observations:
- The mission of the EOWG is outstanding. This work is much needed.
- The scope is also excellent; easy to understand and well focused.
- W3C Member: Benetech — Charles LaPierre, Technical Lead, DIAGRAM and Born Accessible
Benetech supports the work of the Accessibility Education and Outreach Working Group and the progress towards re-chartering of the activity. With EPUB now under the domain of the W3C and the new Publishing WG formed we would like to see Education and Outreach include items specific to accessible digital publishing.
- W3C Member: Deque Systems, Inc. — Denis Boudreau, Principal consultant & trainer
Deque Systems values the work and resources that are coming out of the EOWG effort. So much so, that we regularly introduce or at least link to these resources in our training materials, and recommend our clients read and use those resources without moderation. Examples of such resources include "How people with disabilities use the Web", "Quick tips to get started", "Quick Reference" and "Planning and managing web accessibility".
- W3C Member: Pearson — Brent A. Bakken, Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
My team develops accessibility training and educational materials that are distributed globally across many Pearson lines of business. The backbone of these assets are directly linked to, and aligned with a wide variety of resources posted throughout the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) website. The WAI resources, predominantly created by the Education and Outreach Working Group, are seen by Pearson staff as consumable, thorough, and authoritative; therefore trusted. WAI resources that are developed by a working group consisting of a variety of member participants bringing the experience of diverse roles and varied perspectives, lends to the credibility viewed by company leadership.
- W3C Member: Accessible Media Inc (AMI) — Chris O'Brien, Accessibility Officer
Accessible Media Inc (AMI) also firmly support the work done by the Accessibility Education and Outreach WG. It is my understanding that the W3C is keenly interested in raising its accessibility competencies throughout its various initiatives. The work done by EOWG provide the solid underpinnings to help us achieve that goal.
- W3C Member: Knowbility — Katie Haritos-Shea, Board Member, W3C AC representative
Knowbility is pleased with the direction taken by the proposed new charter for the Education and Outreach Working Group and fully supports the request to re-charter. In addition to providing leadership to the group (Knowbility's ED Sharron Rush serves as EOWG co-chair), Knowbility contributes a Fellow to the W3C whose duties partially include EOWG staff liaison. We are motivated to this level of support by our strong belief in the enormous impact of EOWG deliverables in raising awareness and skill in creating an Open Web. EO materials - including the Quick Ref, Tutorials, Policy documents, and more - help the global community understand existing barriers and provide trusted guidance for removing such barriers. The authoritative voice of a W3C Working Group is a powerful incentive for organizations from government, academia, and the private sector to align their ICT goals with W3C accessibility standards.
I personally am excited about the valuable resources that the US government will be utilizing from EOWG as they begin their implementation of the Section 508 Refresh that includes WCAG 2.0.We are pleased to see substantially greater member participation in EOWG over the last two years. We are confident that the WAI site redesign and resource updates planned for the next charter period will continue to further the accessibility mission of the W3C and look forward to continued participation.
Via e-mail (W3C Member links)
Thank you very much to everyone who submitted questions and comments (and statements of support) during the advanced review timeframe so that we could address them before the formal review period.
Note: Draft EOWG Charter 2017 is updated.
Track record in getting work done?
Of the major deliverables in the 2015 Charter Milestones table, EOWG completed 10, and the remaining 2 may be completed in the current extension period or soon after. EOWG also completed most of the minor updates, did some of the optional work, and completed an additional resource update. Details are available in the 2015 Charter Milestones status table.
EOWG deliverables are also listed on the EOWG home page under Publications.
What real world impact the work being proposed has had in the past? Testimonials from consumers of the work...
...would be more persuasive than those from contributors"
EOWG participants and W3C Staff know of many real world uses of EOWG Resources in external training and consulting, in internal staff training, in MOOCs, in books, in policies, and in standards globally; however, we have not prioritized regular tracking of such information. EOWG participants did look for a few examples of places referring to EOWG materials, and we listed some under Examples of EOWG resource use by community.
Almost all of the expressions of support listed above under "Via e-mail (W3C Member links)" are from consumers of the work who have not been involved in developing it. As mentioned below, many find the work useful without their needing to contribute.
Testimonial-type sharing of resources that consumers find useful is often done in tweets these days. Resource specific below lists a sampling of testimonial-like tweets from consumers on specific EOWG Resources, and below that is list of all tweets since May 2016.
Active participants and engagement in the work?
Over the last 2 years, EOWG has increased W3C Member participation and active engagement in the work. Many W3C Members who are not actively participating have expressed that they benefit from this work (e.g., most of those listed under "Via e-mail" above). EOWG has been continuously improving structures and processes to encourage participation, such as facilitating asynchronous contributions, based on participant and potential contributor input.
Current EOWG currently has 45 registered participants - most are from W3C Member organizations, 3 are Invited Experts (3 others listed as Invited Experts are from a Member company that is getting "paperwork" sorted after a merger), 4 are staff (2 are part-time participants who are active in all EOWG work, and 2 for specific deliverables only). Some of the registered participants are not able to make time to contribute much.
22 are currently actively participating in either all EOWG work or in specific deliverables.
15 engage in most surveys, teleconferences, and/or work via GitHub.
We expect similar active participation going forward. We have seen an increases in comments from beyond active participants (largely through GitHub), and expect that to increase.
One reason that more organizations do not actively contribute to EOWG work is that they are content with the quality of work coming out of EOWG and do not feel the need to participate to improve it.
Who has been actively engaged in the charter preparatory work?
EOWG Co-Chairs (Brent Bakken, Pearson; Sharron Rush, Knowbility) have lead concept development for the deliverables in this proposed charter, along with Staff Contact (Shawn Henry). Potential and then proposed deliverables and the draft charter has been discussed in several EOWG teleconferences and face-to-face meetings since November 2016, included in surveys to all EOWG participants, and discussed in WAI Coordination Calls.
EOWG participants and W3C Staff actively solicited input on potential EOWG work for the next proposed charter from other Working Groups, AC Reps, other W3C Members, and the broader community — for example: at TPAC in September 2016, EOWG Co-Chairs and staff met with other Working Groups and with some AC Reps (some together, some individually); Shawn reached out (either directly, or through EOWG participants) to most of the AC Reps who commented during the 2015 charter review; Brent, Sharron, Shadi, Judy, and Shawn have taken opportunities at conferences to talk to W3C Members as well as the broader community.
The charter and this page were largely written up by W3C Staff Contact Shawn Henry based on input from EOWG Co-Chairs, WAI Director Judy Brewer, and W3C Strategy Teamers Shadi Abou-Zahra and Wendy Seltzer.
What success indicators we can track going forward to assess whether the WG has done what it set out to do.
EOWG will continue to provide status on planned work, such as 2015 Charter Milestones status.
EOWG may also more proactively solicit information on community use of EOWG Resources in order to have better data, including related to outreach.
Why is this being proposed as a Working Group?
See Analysis in the next section.
Analysis of Working Group, Interest Group, Community Group
Partly based on AC feedback in 2015, the Co-Chairs, Team, and EOWG participants have carefully considered the options of work being done in a Community Group, Interest Group, or Working Group. EOWG participants started some work through a Community Group (WAI-Engage), but it got limited contributions and uptake. Since 2015, there has been some effort to get more involvement from the existing WAI Interest Group participants into EOWG Resources (e.g., call for review, reminder). That has resulted in a little more input (usually 0-2 comments per resource), but not sufficient review and contribution.
Based on these experiences and analysis (more details below), EOWG Co-Chairs and participants find that a Working Group is important for:
- the purpose of the group to develop vetted deliverables by W3C consensus process
- credibility and authority of deliverables
- participant support and motivation to contribute
- leveraging the momentum and positive public reputation of the existing productive working group
Accessibility education and outreach materials with the authority and credibility of being developed in a Working Group can better support other Working Groups and W3C's accessibility goals, as discussed in the charter Introduction.
One perspective is that there is little risk to continue W3C accessibility education and outreach work through the established Working Group, whose productivity and quality of deliverables is at a high level over the last couple of years.
Process 2017 describes WGs and IGs as:
- Working Groups. Working Groups typically produce deliverables (e.g., Recommendation Track technical reports, software, test suites, and reviews of the deliverables of other groups). There are additional participation requirements described in the W3C Patent Policy [PUB33].
- Interest Groups. The primary goal of an Interest Group is to bring together people who wish to evaluate potential Web technologies and policies. An Interest Group is a forum for the exchange of ideas.
The Education and Outreach group continues to focus on producing deliverables and updating existing EOWG deliverables through the W3C consensus process, rather than exchanging ideas of potential Web technologies, and thus fits the W3C Process doc's description of a Working Group.
EOWG resources need the W3C process and staff contribution (beyond typical Community Groups) to ensure quality of deliverables that are published as WAI Resources.
Pros and Cons
(merge, no separate EO group)
|Authority and credibility of deliverables||PRO: highest||CON: lower||CON: lower||CON: lowest|
|Participant support or motivation to contribute||PRO: highest||CON: little (a)||CON: little (a)||CON: lowest|
|Leveraging existing productive group||PRO: highest||CON: less (a)||CON: non-existant||CON: non-existant|
|W3C Process requirements for consensus & vetting||strongest||?||?||? none|
Participant Contribution Perspectives
(a) EOWG participants (most of whom are W3C Members) have repeatedly said that if the group was an Interest Group instead of a Working Group, they expect that their organization would not support their time on it. Some said they would be removed from the group, others said that they wouldn't have much time to contribute to the work, since it would be all outside of their work time. This was mentioned at the February 2017 face-to-face (participant list) as well as other times when the topic was brought up.
Most EOWG participants get permission to spend time contributing to EOWG from their immediate manager. Most of those managers know little or nothing about W3C's distinctions of Working Groups, Interest Groups, and Community Groups. They hear "W3C Working Group" and that sounds like worth investing some time into. However, if they hear "Interest Group" or "Community Group", that sounds less important and not something worth spending employee time on.
Some EOWG participants know that the WAI-Engage Community Group has gotten no traction, and the content they put there gets little attention. Some associate "Interest Group" with the existing WAI Interest Group, which is primarily a mailing list, and not a group that produces deliverables. Thus, some of these individuals feel that it is not worth investing their time and talents in a Community Group or Interest Group.
From 2015 Charter review disposition of comments:
In the W3C Process document, Working Groups are described as typically producing deliverables (and reviewing the deliverables of other groups), while an Interest Group is described as a forum for the exchange of ideas with a primary goal of bringing together people who wish to evaluate potential Web technologies and policies. W3C staff reviewed EOWG against the current W3C Process definitions and given that EOWG is primarily focused on producing deliverables, albeit not normative specifications, we find it fits as a Working Group as currently defined in the W3C Process.
EOWG has tried producing work through a Community Group in the past, and this was not successful at all. Key missing elements included lack of a Team Contact and lack of participation parameters. We feel that EOWG deliverables will be best developed at the pace and quality needed within the context of a Working Group rather than Community Group; and maintenance and updating of the existing EOWG documents will also be best managed in a group that has a continuity of background with those documents.
We agree with your point that additional exploration of the issue of why developers find accessibility difficult can be done in Community Groups, and we are monitoring such discussions, for example, in the Accessible Online Learning, Accessibility in India, and Chinese Web Accessibility Community Groups.
Staff Support and External Funding
- W3C Staff Contact Shawn Henry is funded by WAI-HSS-NIDILRR (WAI-HSS) and WAI Sponsor funds.
- Eric Eggert is a part-time Fellow provided by Knowbility, a W3C Member.
As of 4 July 2017, no other existing external funding is allocated to EOWG for this charter period. In the future, other funding may be offered to support EOWG's chartered work.
W3C Member and Community Use of EOWG Resources
Examples of EOWG resource use by community
- IAAP - Prepare for WAS Exam links to Introduction to Web Accessibility, Essential Components of Web Accessibility, How People with Disabilities Use the Web, Web Accessibility and Older People, Web Accessibility Perspectives: Explore the Impact and Benefits for Everyone, Experiences Shared by People with Disabilities and by People Using Mobile Devices, Designing for Web Accessibility, Writing for Web Accessibility, Developing for Web Accessibility, WAI Tutorials How to Meet WCAG 2.0 (Quick Reference),
- Stackoverflow references: Tables tutorial, Forms tutorials, Carousels tutorial, How to Met WCAG: QuickRef
- Barclaycard links to Better Web Browsing - Tips for Customizing your Computer, Contacting Organizations about Inaccessible Websites
- Building Accessible Websites - includes "The W3C’s Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is an effort to help improve the accessibility of the web. Their site provides a variety of resources for Getting Started with Web Accessibility, Designing for Inclusion, tutorials and presentations, and more." and other links including: Easy Checks – A First Review of Web Accessibility, Tips on Developing for Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Perspectives: Explore the Impact and Benefits for Everyone
- Accessibility Testing links to Easy Checks, How to Meet WCAG: Customizeable QuickRef, Evaluation Tools List
Education: (which helps industry be able to hire more accessibility knowledge and skill)
- Harvard - Web Accessibility at Harvard links to WAI website and How to Meet WCAG: Customizeable QuickRef that EOWG redesigned
- Purdue - Show me Some Examples links to How People with Disabilities Use the Web and Perspectives videos
- Yale - Web Accessibility at Yale - References WAI as "Essential resources" and specifically links to EOWG's Introduction to Web Accessibility
- Louisiana Workforce Commission - info page links to Easy Checks
- City of Austin, Texas — The City uses EOWG resources to craft their accessibility policy statements and Resources (PDF) links to these EOWG resources: Easy Checks - A First Review of Web Accessibility, Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion: Related Aspects of a Web for All, Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools, How to Meet WCAG 2.0: customizable quick reference
- Australian Government — GOV.AU Content Guide links to various Web Accessibility Tutorials, to How People with Disabilities Use the Web as well as to Techniques for WCAG 2.0
Resource specific testimonials
This section has a sampling of consumer tweets and relate info on EOWG work. All tweets are linked below.
How to Meet WCAG 2.0: Customizable Quick Reference
- The new WCAG quick reference is brilliant (especially the filters) https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ https://twitter.com/gtvjones/status/783953556164452352
- การพัฒนาเว็บไซต์ให้เข้าถึงได้เป็นการพัฒนาเพื่อให้สามารถใช้งานเว็บไซต์ได้โดยคนๆ กลุ่ม ตามหลักการของ Universal... http://fb.me/8lx87cuk6 https://twitter.com/thaiwebaccess/status/784211942609215488
- Thanks to the folks responsible for making this quick reference to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines! https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/#visual-audio-contrast-contrast https://twitter.com/abdelazer/status/785913212441022464
- So many designers forget about web accessibility and how important it is to implement into our work! https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ … #web #design https://twitter.com/LindaDesigner/status/765233853833195521
Easy Checks - A First Review of Web Accessibility
- Making your site accessible using W3C's Easy Checks - "an infographic based on the W3C's ten easy checks"
- Vous n'êtes pas expert ou experte en #a11y? Easy Checks de @w3c_wai est votre ami : https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/preliminary.html #CSUNATC17 https://twitter.com/ConsBoreale/status/837697796329218048
- Se faire une idée du niveau d'#accessibilité de son site ? Le @w3c_wai a mis à jour ces "Easy checks" : https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/preliminary #a11y #web https://twitter.com/access42net/status/811179345842728961
- Easy Checks site: helps you identify low-hanging fruit to improve #a11y on your website. https://twitter.com/redcrew/status/760888701144694784
How People with Disabilities Use the Web
- The W3C has a page of user stories that can help you build #UX personas that include people with disabilities: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web/stories #ID24 https://twitter.com/dotjay/status/733377048249552896
- Web developers and companies need to pay attention to this: they miss out on important demographics if they... http://fb.me/10BKHTDPo https://twitter.com/valleyswordwork/status/801457277349859328
- フローチャート式alt属性の使い方 / An alt Decision Tree • Images • WAI Web Accessibility Tutorials http://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/decision-tree/ https://twitter.com/webcre8/status/753140834363584512
- これ本当助かった。正しいHTML構造の良いドキュメント。https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/ https://twitter.com/bennkyougirai/status/872790902984458240
- "Labeling Controls" https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/forms/labels/ … -> A good read on accessible forms! https://twitter.com/evaferreira92/status/781834625136156672
- I wish I would have known about https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/ a long time ago. Very well done accessibility tutorials https://twitter.com/Mike_Selander/status/740526418535284736
- WAI Web Accessibility Tutorials http://ow.ly/MARs301ZXUy It's work in progress, but a great resource for #a11y #UX #WebDesign #WebDev https://twitter.com/Mr0wka18/status/750856140469243904
Tips for Getting Started with Web Accessibility
- Whether you're a writer, designer, or developer, here are great tips for getting started with web #a11y http://bit.ly/2aOhI7u
- @maymaymx some very, very good tips about vision accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/gettingstarted/tips/designing https://twitter.com/qseds/status/734868264581509121
- Great strategies for creating accessible web content https://www.w3.org/WAI/gettingstarted/tips/ https://twitter.com/AnneBoysHope/status/829465231445352450
WCAG-EM Report Tool: Website Accessibility Evaluation Report Generator
- WAI謹製のウェブアクセシビリティ報告書作成ツール。いまは英語とオランダ語の提供だけど、結構わかりやすい。http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/report-tool/#/ … （柴田）https://twitter.com/jidaikobo/status/735074537285390336
- I'm prepping for a mtg about why #a11y is important and the business reasons for it. There's so much good info here: https://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/soc https://twitter.com/nicki_rios/status/875095234610331648
- Social Factors in Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization https://goo.gl/ty1spv @w3c_wai #inclusion #webaccess https://twitter.com/wonntann/status/783711929701326848
- Great art. W3C is a start. Business case for web accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/bcase/Overview.html #axschat https://twitter.com/cldbrand/status/826542839332892672
How to Make Presentations Accessible to All
- Thanks @MuseumCN for emphasis on designing an accessible conference. Found this resource very helpful: https://www.w3.org/WAI/training/accessible.php #MCN2016 https://twitter.com/perrycollins/status/787004398090067968
- Great thread. This is a nicely thought out resource for presenters & conference planners: https://www.w3.org/WAI/training/accessible.php https://twitter.com/phlu/status/857551921485418499
Web Accessibility Perspectives
- 800 – 2,400 views on each of the main videos (not audio described versions) on YouTube .
- "one of the most significant things coming out of the W3C’s Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) is the fantastic Web Accessibility Perspectives videos which provide a number of excellent examples of how people with disabilities use the web. In the past, it’s often been hard to find professional and specific examples of the web in action by people with disabilities and this resource has been a tremendous addition." 2016 year in Review (consumer, not contributor)
- Happy #GAAD! Today I thank the W3C for these excellent new videos - https://www.w3.org/WAI/perspectives/ … and for the flurry of recent activity on WCAG. — https://twitter.com/jared_w_smith/status/733306805489557504
- @w3c_wai has an awesome set of videos up for #GAAD2016: https://www.w3.org/WAI/perspectives/Overview.html — https://twitter.com/CaitlinGeier/status/733353843027632130
- Great short videos from @w3c_wai a must-watch for #webdev folk #GAAD #AXSChat #a11y — https://twitter.com/CarineMarzin/status/733208213512933376
- Care about #web #accessibility but not a techie? GREAT to-the-point videos by @w3c_wai https://www.w3.org/WAI/perspectives/ … #satech #edtech #a11y — https://twitter.com/paulschantz/status/733013735673991168
- Accessible websites are good for all users. @w3c has some great information about the benefits of #a11y http://bit.ly/2otNoT0 https://twitter.com/NFB_voice/status/855462389239742465
- Videos with situations showing impact of web accessibility https://lnkd.in/e43cF-a Thanks @w3c_wai ! (this is very useful) #a11y #GAAD — https://twitter.com/RubysDo/status/732987428525379585
- Great new resource! Videos show web accessibility is essential for some, useful for all. http://j.mp/WAIperspectives by @w3c_wai #a11y — https://twitter.com/EasyChirp/status/732980104209399808
- Great new resource from @w3c_wai on benefits of web #accessibility and benefits for everyone: https://lnkd.in/btVABdA — https://twitter.com/bcurtisdavidson/status/732951991366750208
- Great to see these new videos explaining different perspectives on aspects of Web Accessibility #fixtheweb — https://twitter.com/FixtheWeb/status/732890147398799360
- A great resource to show real-world accessibility! — https://twitter.com/DigitalAccessVA/status/732817521473138689
- WELL DONE! watching Video Captions - short sweet to the point. Now need same for non-e access (live events) and streams closing gap — https://twitter.com/CCACaptioning/status/732715184079409152
- Good basic tutorials on accessibility from @w3c_wai http://www.w3.org/WAI/perspectives/ … also showcasing features of accessible video needed — https://twitter.com/alexvarley/status/732698858015232001
- List of past tweets
- thanks! Where's a good place to start learning about this sort of thing? It seems necessary.
I’d start with the W3C’s WCAG site https://www.w3.org/WAI/users/Overview.html Then, start reading A List Apart, or UX stuff on Medium https://twitter.com/NatDudley/status/761009397627662336
- Social media researchers, if you want to know more about accessibility and the web, start here: https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php … #nsmnss https://twitter.com/slewth/status/785844062691655680
- Great resources at from W3C on universal design at https://www.w3.org/WAI/users/Overview.html #NetHui https://twitter.com/ellenstrickland/status/787068206993186816
- List of Tweets from April 4 2017 to now: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KqWbzP6SwRSKhXqnlQxi16PkxA9wuRUtn9hWhL8B3ZA/edit?usp=sharing
- List of Tweets from May 17 2016 to April 4 2017: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d-oMIV9iQ2MsSFDQMyPf95Ftz8tEypuewyTmdqbMK2g/edit?usp=sharing