W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Survey - Tutorials & BAD (24 March 2017)

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2017-03-24 to 2017-04-04.

11 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Minutes of 24 March 2017
  2. New Tutorials - Requirements
  3. Tutorial Outline - Mobile Overview
  4. Tutorial Outline - ARIA Concepts
  5. Tutorial Outline - Date Pickers
  6. Tutorial Outline - Captions
  7. BAD Update and Guidance
  8. Using BAD for Curriculum - Outline

1. Minutes of 24 March 2017

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 24 March 2017 EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2017 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. 6
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 4
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Minutes of 24 March 2017Comments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
 But I couldn't find any resolutions in the summary at the bottom.
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Norah Sinclair
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Sarah Pulis
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
 I don't see any resolutions listed in the minutes btw.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Howard Kramer
  • Brent Bakken
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Sarah Pulis
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. New Tutorials - Requirements

summary | by responder | by choice

We have editor resources to develop more Tutorials. Here is a Requirements Analysis doc for the proposed new tutorials:
March 2017 Tutorials Requirements Analysis.
(fyi, here is the previous/old requirements analysis.)

Let us know if you have any comments on the requirements overview, but note that you may need to look at the four linked outlines to clarify what the brief blurbs in the requirements overview mean.

Please put any general comments or questions on the Requirements Analysis as GitHub issues with the label "March_2017_requirements".
(Later questions in this survey ask about the content and outlines of the specific tutorials.)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 6
I put comments in GitHub issues with the label "March_2017_requirements" (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 2
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below: 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder New Tutorials - RequirementsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Eric Eggert
  • I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
 End of survey.
Sharron Rush
Norah Sinclair
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Sarah Pulis
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Howard Kramer
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Brent Bakken Nothing further to add outside of the discussions in planning meeting and the EO Friday call.

Really looking to keep the tutorials ask crisp, specific "How To" documents that people feel guided through a specific aspect of making content or applications accessible. Hoping that these don't become broad resources. I think we are on the right track with datepicker and captions.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Sarah Pulis
  • Howard Kramer
I put comments in GitHub issues with the label "March_2017_requirements" (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
  • Eric Eggert

3. Tutorial Outline - Mobile Overview

summary | by responder | by choice

Here is a draft outline for a new Mobile Overview Tutorial

One question to consider: Do you think that a overview approach might help draw in some audiences that are specifically looking for accessibility resources labeled "mobile"?

Any other comments, questions or concerns?

Please put any comments or questions as GitHub issues with the label "mobile-overview".

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 4
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 5
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Tutorial Outline - Mobile OverviewComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Eric Eggert
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-tutorials/issues/475
Sharron Rush
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 Summary: Mobile Accessibility seems like a very broad topic for a tutorial. Perhaps we should create a Mobile Authoring Guide, similar to the ARIA authoring guide and then take a similar "How to use the Guide" approach in the tutorials.
Norah Sinclair
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 Can Tips and Tricks be renamed Tips and Techniques?
Should Responsive Design be added as a topic in Concepts of Mobile Accessibility Section?
Sarah Pulis
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 General topics such as mobile environment as a continuum between Web and native and why this is important should be reflected in Mobile Accessibility page [https://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/Overview]. I don't think everything would search for this information in the tutorials.
Howard Kramer
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Brent Bakken
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 I do like some of the key areas of the Mobile outline. Specifically, the introduction to developers unfamiliar with WCAG 2.0, similarities/differences in coding approach for an accessible website vs an accessible app, the Parallel principles of accessibility in the mobile environment section, and the Mobile specific considerations.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Howard Kramer
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Sarah Pulis
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:

4. Tutorial Outline - ARIA Concepts

summary | by responder | by choice

Here is a draft outline for a new Tutorial on ARIA Concepts with Sliders Example.

Question to consider: Do you think that it would be useful to have a conceptual intro to ARIA that serves as a bridge to the other tutorial-like resources emerging in the ARIA Authoring Practices document?

Any other comments, questions or concerns?

Please put any comments or questions as GitHub issues with the label "aria-concepts-with-sliders".

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 2
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 7
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Tutorial Outline - ARIA ConceptsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 If I understand correctly, this tutorial only gives one example: slider. May be it could be useful to explain that this slider is only one example of what can be done with ARIA. Otherwise, people would think that ARIA is only similar to slider.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 I managed to put it in Github!!! Hopefully I did it right. LOL
Eric Eggert
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-tutorials/issues/476
Sharron Rush
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 Summary: Maybe what would be most useful is a tutorial on "How to Use the ARIA Authoring Guide" with more than one example of building out components.
Norah Sinclair
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 This suggestion applies to each of the tutorials, would suggest removing the word "tricks" from Tips and Tricks and possibly replace with "Techniques"
Sarah Pulis
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 I would add section on the importance of testing with different assistive technologies to ensure ARIA widgets works as expected on desktop and mobile.
Howard Kramer
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Brent Bakken
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Laura Keen
  • Howard Kramer
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Sarah Pulis
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:

5. Tutorial Outline - Date Pickers

summary | by responder | by choice

Here is a draft outline for a new Tutorial on Date Pickers.

Question to consider: Do you think that it would be useful to have a tutorial that serves partly as a gateway to the UI components library, that could be made available once that is ready in the future?

Any other comments, questions or concerns?

Please put any comments or questions as GitHub issues with the label "datepicker".

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 3
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 4
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below: 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Tutorial Outline - Date PickersComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
 This page returns a 404.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Eric Eggert
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-tutorials/issues/477
Sharron Rush
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 same point. if UI components list can be stabilized, use tutorial as How To Use instruction
Norah Sinclair
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Sarah Pulis
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 Reliance on UI Components Library being available.
Howard Kramer
Brent Bakken
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Norah Sinclair
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Sarah Pulis
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
  • Laura Keen

6. Tutorial Outline - Captions

summary | by responder | by choice

Here is a draft outline for a new Tutorial on Captions.

Question to consider: Do you have thoughts about what would be the best scope and focus of this tutorial?

Any other comments, questions or concerns?

Please put any comments or questions as GitHub issues with the label "captions".

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 2
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 5
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below: 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Tutorial Outline - CaptionsComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 The link to outline does not work
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer Link to outline for this tutorial has been fixed.
Laura Keen
  • I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
 This page returns a 404.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
 Happy Comment - Love this tutorial. I know a lot of people it will help!
Eric Eggert
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-tutorials/issues/478
Sharron Rush
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 +1 to broaden scope to accessible media
Norah Sinclair
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 I wonder if the idea behind this statement could be presented in a different way: "when quality may matter a lot" ? I'm thinking someone who cannot access the audio, may have the opinion that quality should matter in all situations.
Sarah Pulis
  • Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Howard Kramer
Brent Bakken
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Outline looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Sarah Pulis
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
  • Laura Keen

7. BAD Update and Guidance

summary | by responder | by choice

We have editor resources to develop a resource on using the Before and After Demo (BAD) in training, and for starting to update BAD. Here is a Requirements Analysis doc for the proposed new work: BAD Update Requirements Analysis.

Comments at this high level welcome, but this is mainly the context for the next question, on using the BAD Demo as Curriculum.

Please put any comments or questions on the Requirements Analysis as a new issue in the GitHub BAD demo repository.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 4
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 3
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below: 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder BAD Update and GuidanceComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
Kris Anne Kinney
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Eric Eggert
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-bad-demo/issues/4
Sharron Rush
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Norah Sinclair
  • Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Sarah Pulis
  • I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
 3 April 2017
Howard Kramer
Brent Bakken
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Requirements Analysis looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Sharron Rush
  • Norah Sinclair
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Laura Keen
  • Eric Eggert
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
  • Sarah Pulis

8. Using BAD for Curriculum - Outline

summary | by responder | by choice

Here is a draft outline on the proposed new resource on Using BAD for Curriculum

Do you have thoughts about what would be the best scope, focus, and format for this material?

Please add any comments or questions to GitHub Issue #1 - BAD_Curric.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions. 2
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below) 5
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below: 1

(3 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Using BAD for Curriculum - OutlineComments
Sylvie Duchateau
  • Looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Judy Brewer
Laura Keen
  • Looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 I +1 to Laura's comment about the Issue of the responsive design site.
Eric Eggert
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 https://github.com/w3c/wai-bad-demo/issues/5
Sharron Rush
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
Norah Sinclair
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
 I would like to take another look at this after the meeting Friday March 30. Some initial thoughts: A series of guided questions to facilitate exploration could be helpful. Also a video demonstration(s) of user of assistive technology encountering the accessibility barriers and discussing them can be helpful for understanding with second video showing improved access with the more accessible site.
Sarah Pulis
  • I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
 3 April 2017
Howard Kramer
Brent Bakken
  • I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Looks fine, I don't have any comments or questions.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Laura Keen
I put comments as GitHub issues (or, I don't use GitHub, so put Comments below)
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Brent Bakken
I haven't gotten to this yet, and will by the date in the comments field below:
  • Sarah Pulis

More details on responses

  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 27, March 2017 at 14:30 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 27, March 2017 at 16:45 (UTC)
  • Judy Brewer: last responded on 28, March 2017 at 03:18 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 28, March 2017 at 13:23 (UTC)
  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 28, March 2017 at 19:37 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 29, March 2017 at 17:36 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 29, March 2017 at 18:04 (UTC)
  • Norah Sinclair: last responded on 29, March 2017 at 21:43 (UTC)
  • Sarah Pulis: last responded on 31, March 2017 at 12:20 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 31, March 2017 at 12:46 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 4, April 2017 at 22:20 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Shawn Lawton Henry
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Vicki Menezes Miller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin White
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Denis Boudreau
  17. Bill Tyler
  18. Gregorio Pellegrino
  19. Ruoxi Ran
  20. Jennifer Chadwick
  21. Sean Kelly
  22. Muhammad Saleem
  23. Sarah Lewthwaite
  24. Daniel Montalvo
  25. Mark Palmer
  26. Jade Matos Carew
  27. Sonsoles López Pernas
  28. Greta Krafsig
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.