Planet MathML

The Planet MathML aggregates posts from various blogs that concern MathML. Although it is hosted by W3C, the content of the individual entries represent only the opinion of their respective authors and does not reflect the position of W3C.

en-US August 13, 2014 AIP Publishing continues as MathJax Supporter

Author: Peter Krautzberger | Channel: MathJax

Mathjax is pleased to announce that AIP Publishing and the American Institute of Physics have reaffirmed their commitment to MathJax in the form of a renewed financial contribution for 2014. AIP Publishing provides the global physical science community with a comprehensive collection of highly cited peer reviewed scientific information. Accessed by researchers at nearly 4,000 institutions worldwide, AIP Publishing’s portfolio of 17 journals includes prestigious titles such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, and The Journal of Chemical Physics, and the AIP Conference Proceedings series. AIP Publishing also publishes on behalf of several of AIP’s Member Societies and other publishing partners.

As a federation of 10 physical science societies, The American Institute of Physics (AIP) pursues a mission to advance and distribute the knowledge of the physical sciences and its applications. AIP Member Societies collectively represent more than 120,000 scientists, engineers, educators and students in the global physical sciences community.

“The continued support of AIP Publishing demonstrates its commitment to being a partner to the science community”, comments Peter Krautzberger, MathJax manager. “The feedback of sponsors such as AIP is invaluable to ensure that MathJax remains the reliable, high-quality rendering solution it is today.”

“We believe MathJax provides a valuable service to researchers in the physical sciences by taking the worry out of accurately displaying and easily sharing the mathematical equations that are so important to the research they do,” said John Haynes, CEO of AIP Publishing.

We look forward to continuing the collaboration with AIP, and welcome their ongoing support for the MathJax project.

UND August 02, 2014 MathML panel at Balisage 2014

Author: Lauren Wood | Channel: Design Science News

Next week at the Balisage conference I'm going to be part of a panel on MathML that includes Scott Dineen (Optical Society of America), Alexander Miłowski (University of Edinburgh), and Kennett Rawson (IEEE). We'll be discussing MathML in some depth, covering topics including authoring, web browsing, ebooks, accessibility, conversion, and proofreading. The panel is Wednesday Aug 6, from 11 AM to 12:30 PM.

Balisage is a technical conference about markup and all those related technologies that are used for structuring information. The conference is August 5 - 8, 2014 in Washington, DC, USA.  Balisage attendees include many of the people who write and maintain the specifications on which XML depends, design the commonly-used schemas, and implement the tools XML systems depend on. Together with the XML power users and consultants who also attend Balisage regularly, they exchange ideas and fuel the next wave of XML-related innovations.

Autumn Cuellar will also be at Balisage this year, so if you're attending, let's talk about MathML! If you're not attending, but want to know more about how MathFlow can make it easier to get MathML into your content, let us know.

UND August 01, 2014 Design Science News: MathML panel at Balisage 2014

Author: Lauren Wood | Channel: mathml - Google Blog Search

Next week at the Balisage conference I'm going to be part of a panel on MathML that includes Scott Dineen (Optical Society of America), Alexander Miłowski (University of Edinburgh), and Kennett Rawson (IEEE). We'll be ...

UND July 27, 2014 Re: Old-style numbers and calligraphic letters in OpenType math fonts

Author: Khaled Hosny (khaledhosny@eglug.org) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 09:04:25PM +0200, Frédéric WANG wrote:
> Le 26/07/2014 19:18, Will Robertson a écrit :
> >I *think* I've seen an example of extremely old French maths that was set
> >in osf, but I could be wrong... if I remember I'll try investigate
> >(perhaps remind me if you're particularly interested.) Will
> Well, I trust you. But from my experiments, all the OpenType families that
> have both text and math fonts only have old style number in the text fonts.
> If these are new families start providing old style numbers for the math
> font too, then it will be easy to update the CSS rules in my MathFonts
> repository to take them into account.

The problem with old style number in math is that it might cause
something like, say, old style 4 or 9 to be mistaken with a subscript
one.

Regards,
Khaled

UND July 26, 2014 Re: Old-style numbers and calligraphic letters in OpenType math fonts

Author: Frédéric WANG (fred.wang@free.fr) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Le 26/07/2014 19:18, Will Robertson a écrit :
> I *think* I've seen an example of extremely old French maths that was 
> set in osf, but I could be wrong... if I remember I'll try investigate 
> (perhaps remind me if you're particularly interested.) Will 
Well, I trust you. But from my experiments, all the OpenType families 
that have both text and math fonts only have old style number in the 
text fonts. If these are new families start providing old style numbers 
for the math font too, then it will be easy to update the CSS rules in 
my MathFonts repository to take them into account.

-- 
Frédéric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

UND July 26, 2014 Re: Old-style numbers and calligraphic letters in OpenType math fonts

Author: Will Robertson (wspr81@gmail.com) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

(From phone) 

> On 26 Jul 2014, at 4:23 am, Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> Khaled Hosny pointed out that old style numbers are available for the text font and don't really make sense for the math font.

I *think* I've seen an example of extremely old French maths that was set in osf, but I could be wrong... if I remember I'll try investigate (perhaps remind me if you're particularly interested.)

Will

UND July 26, 2014 Re: Old-style numbers and calligraphic letters in OpenType math fonts

Author: Frédéric WANG (fred.wang@free.fr) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Le 25/07/2014 15:35, Frédéric WANG a écrit :
> - Asana Math and XITS have calligraphic variants.
> - Asana Math, Neo Euler and XITS have old style numbers.
> - Other fonts do not seem to have such variants (or they are 
> proprietary and I can test them).
>
Khaled Hosny pointed out that old style numbers are available for the 
text font and don't really make sense for the math font. So I updated my 
GitHub page to reflect that. Now, as I see, all the free fonts have old 
style numbers, but only Asana Math and XITS Math have calligraphic scripts.

-- 
Frédéric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

UND July 25, 2014 Old-style numbers and calligraphic letters in OpenType math fonts

Author: Frédéric WANG (fred.wang@free.fr) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Dear all,

I've updated my repository of OpenType math WOFF fonts to add some CSS 
rules for old-style numbers and calligraphic letters:

http://fred-wang.github.io/MathFonts/

So the current status from my testing is

- Asana Math and XITS have calligraphic variants.
- Asana Math, Neo Euler and XITS have old style numbers.
- Other fonts do not seem to have such variants (or they are proprietary 
and I can test them).

I listed all the possible syntaxes, either with 
font-variant-numeric/font-variant-alternates not yet enabled/implemented 
in browsers or font-feature-settings with/without browser-specific prefix.

-- 
Frédéric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

UND July 24, 2014 Mozilla fixes CRITICAL security holes in Firefox, urges v31 upgrade

Channel: Ask.com News Search for "mathml"

The Register - Found Jul. 24, 2014
... the advisory: “Mozilla community member James Kitchener reported a crash in DirectWrite when rendering MathML content with specific fonts...

UND July 22, 2014 Re: Important information about the MathML fonts in Gecko 31

Author: Frédéric WANG (fred.wang@free.fr) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Le 22/07/2014 08:51, William F Hammond a écrit :
> Why should it be necessary to remove support for old fonts just 
> because new things will be supported? -- Bill 
I supposed you understood that it is not "just because new things will 
be supported" ;-)

First the Unicode-only constructions in arbitrary fonts will still be 
supported, what we want to remove is the old font tables for Asana Math, 
"STIX General" and MathJax. Asana Math and the "STIX Word" set have an 
OpenType MATH table so can be used with the new code. Additionally, 
Latin Modern Math is a "modernized implementation of the Computer Modern 
fonts" (with reshaping and other stuff that are out of my area of 
expertise, see the papers on the GUST website for details) and so can 
now replace the "MathJax TeX" fonts (which is just generated via an 
autotracer, targeted to MathJax's needs and was a temporary solution to 
replace the old BaKoMa TeX support). So first, nobody should need these 
old fonts in the long term since you have equivalent OpenType MATH 
version... why do you want that??

The technical reason why we want to remove support for these old fonts 
is that they need special handlings which make the stretchy operator 
code "complicated" (to use an euphemism). Since we want to optimize it 
in the future, we will need to cleanup the code before refactoring it. 
Moving to OpenType MATH has actually been the plan for 7 years, but that 
finally could only be realized recently, thanks to the Ulule crowdfunding...

Moreover, from the user's point of view, you will get a much more 
consistent way to use the various OpenType MATH fonts in WebKit/Gecko. 
Basically, you now have only one single Math font to deal with and only 
need to set the font-family on the <math> (and perhaps the companion 
fonts for the text). All the mathvariant selection, correction of prime 
size, math layout parameters, stretchy op constructions etc are stored 
in the font and Gecko&WebKit only need to read what has been specified 
by the font authors. One can even create his own math fonts with 
fontforge and they will be immediately supported by Gecko&WebKit without 
having to hardcode new data. For example, if some Mathematica people 
read that, they could just make an OpenType MATH version of their fonts 
and restore the original 15-years old support in Gecko :-)

-- 
Frédéric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

UND July 22, 2014 Mozilla Firefox Multiple Flaws Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary ...

Channel: Ask.com News Search for "mathml"

Security Tracker - Found Jul. 22, 2014
A remote user can trigger a use-after-free in DirectWrite when rendering MathML content with specific fonts to execute arbitrary code [CVE...
Mozilla Thunderbird Multiple Flaws Let Remote Users Deny Service and ... - Security Tracker
Mozilla Firefox Race Condition in libnss CERT_DestroyCertificate() ... - Security Tracker
httpd24-httpd - LWN
RHEL7 - LWN
Explore All

UND July 22, 2014 Mozilla Thunderbird Multiple Flaws Let Remote Users Deny Service and ...

Channel: Ask.com News Search for "mathml"

Security Tracker - Found Jul. 22, 2014
A remote user can trigger a use-after-free in DirectWrite when rendering MathML content with specific fonts to execute arbitrary code [CVE...

UND July 22, 2014 Re: Important information about the MathML fonts in Gecko 31

Author: William F Hammond (hammond@csc.albany.edu) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Frédéric WANG <fred.wang@free.fr> writes:

> ...  The old
> math fonts (e.g. MathJax TeX, STIX General) are now
> deprecated in favor of the modern OpenType math fonts
> (e.g. Latin Modern Math, XITS Math, Cambria Math). There are
> still some known bugs/limitations in Gecko, math fonts and
> systems so that might take some time before the migration
> can be fully done. However, note that we plan to remove
> support for the old fonts in a near future, so please
> upgrade your setup as soon as possible and report any issues
> you find. ...

Why should it be necessary to remove support for old
fonts just because new things will be supported?

                                    -- Bill

UND July 21, 2014 RE: Tie over infinity

Author: George Weilenmann (george.weilenmann@insightsoftware.com) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

The only time I have seen them in Context is in some mid 1800’s treatises for the incomplete infinity and in a few documents concerning uncountable infinity from the early 1900’s, I have not seen their usage in any mathematical texts after the 1950’s that I can recall. It would seem their usage fell out of favor. Instead Aleph and Beth Cardinal Numbers, א U+05D0 ב U+05D1 replaced Uncountable Infinities, and (INCOMPLETE INFINITY) U+29DC ⧜ or (PROPORTIONAL TO) U+221D ∝ or (INFINITY NEGATED WITH VERTICAL BAR) U+29DE for incomplete infinity.

George Weilenmann
IT Help Desk | CRM Customization | Portal Developer
[Description: cid:82D8368C-56BA-48C5-ADFE-8F6F70761408] Office +1 303.800.5027| Mobile +1 720.940.0974
5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 570, Greenwood Village, CO 80111

[Fans of InsightSoftware.com]<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>

From: Shervin Afshar [mailto:shervinafshar@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:49 PM
To: George Weilenmann; www-math@w3.org
Subject: Re: Tie over infinity

Thank you for the information. Do you of any publications that I can see the symbol in context?

↪ Shervin

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:02 PM, George Weilenmann <george.weilenmann@insightsoftware.com<mailto:george.weilenmann@insightsoftware.com>> wrote:
Tie over infinity is a variant of the incomplete Infinity, and rarely used to represent big infinity (uncountable infinity)

George Weilenmann
IT Help Desk | CRM Customization | Portal Developer
Office +1 303.800.5027<tel:%2B1%20303.800.5027>| Mobile +1 720.940.0974<tel:%2B1%20720.940.0974>
5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 570, Greenwood Village, CO 80111

<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
From: Shervin Afshar [mailto:shervinafshar@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:26 PM
To: Murray Sargent
Cc: www-math@w3.org; Barbara Beeton
Subject: Re: Tie over infinity<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
I asked around and looked it up in some source (including Cajori), but to no avail. Any clues about where else to look? Thanks.<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
Shervin<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Murray Sargent <murrays@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
Anyone know how "tie over infinity" ⧝ (29DD) is used in mathematics?

Thanks,
Murray<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system.

Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

InsightSoftware.com is a Trading Name of 'InsightSoftware.com Limited',Registered in England No. 2860790 at 53-55 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, London, W5 5SA, United Kingdom, VAT Number: GB 766 8160 95<http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
 <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and delete this email from your system.

Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

InsightSoftware.com is a Trading Name of 'InsightSoftware.com Limited',Registered in England No. 2860790 at 53-55 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, London, W5 5SA, United Kingdom, VAT Number: GB 766 8160 95


UND July 20, 2014 Re: Tie over infinity

Author: Shervin Afshar (shervinafshar@gmail.com) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Thank you for the background info, but none of these documents (including
proposals to UTC; [1], [2]) have any background about this single symbol
(which doesn't surprise me since it was proposed in a larger repertoire).
So I don't think digging in the ISO archives would make us wiser about the
background and usage.

[1]: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2000/00002-math.pdf
[2]: http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2000/00119-math.pdf

↪Shervin

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:12 AM, <bnb@ams.org> wrote:

>     I asked around and looked it up in some source (including Cajori), but
> to
>     no avail. Any clues about where else to look? Thanks.
>
> thanks for checking.
>
>     Shervin
>
> my records show that it was included in
> the stix requests from the isotech entity
> set associated with sgml support facilties,
> as listed in
>
>   draft technical report ISO/IEC DTR 9573-13-1990(E)
>   ISO/IEC JTC 1
>   Information technology -- SGML support facilities --
>   Techniques for using SGML --
>   Part 13
>   Public entity sets for mathematics and science
>
> which was used as the starting set for the
> stix collection.
>
> i'm not sure what the fate of this tech
> report might be; i believe it was rearranged,
> but whether it was ever voted into final
> status, i don't know.  what i *do* know,
> though, is that it was adopted into the
> w3c entity definitions for characters; see
>
>   XML Entity Definitions for Characters (2nd Edition)
>   W3C Recommendation 10 April 2014
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/
>
> and in particular
>
>   ISOTECH
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/isotech.html
>
> an update is in the works:
>
>   XML Entity Definitions for Characters (3rd Edition)
>   W3C Working Draft 16 April 2014
>   http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007doc/Overview.html
>
> with no change in the isotech complement.
>
> i correspond fairly regularly with both
> the editors of this recommendation (both
> of them are long-time friends), so could
> ask them if they know anything more.  but
> this has been asked before, so i'm sure
> they don't.
>
> i obtained the initial copy of 9573-13
> on paper, as a representative of ams and
> ansi to what was then iso-iec jtc1/sc18/wg8,
> the working group responsible for sgml.
> anders berglund, at the time employed in
> the iso headquarters in geneva, was also
> a member of that wg, and when the stix
> project was established, he provided me
> with electronic copies of relevant
> material, including the entity sets in
> 8879 (sgml) and 9573-13.  however, i'm
> pretty sure he didn't/doesn't know the
> source of the isotech material.  (i think
> i asked at the time, and remember being
> told they were odds and ends from no
> single source.)
>
> i don't know anyone currently in a
> position to investigate old (very old!)
> records at iso, but i'm still in contact
> with a few people who might be able to
> tell me how to find someone, if it is
> worth the effort.  let me know, please.
>                                                 -- bb
>
>
>     On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Murray Sargent <
>     murrays@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>     > Anyone know how "tie over infinity" ? (29DD) is used in mathematics?
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     > Murray
>

UND July 20, 2014 Re: Tie over infinity

Author: Shervin Afshar (shervinafshar@gmail.com) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Thank you for the information. Do you of any publications that I can see
the symbol in context?

↪ Shervin

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:02 PM, George Weilenmann <
george.weilenmann@insightsoftware.com> wrote:

>  Tie over infinity is a variant of the incomplete Infinity, and rarely
> used to represent big infinity (uncountable infinity)
>
>
>
> *George Weilenmann*
>
> IT Help Desk | CRM Customization | Portal Developer
>
> *[image: Description: cid:82D8368C-56BA-48C5-ADFE-8F6F70761408] *
> *Office +1 303.800.5027 <%2B1%20303.800.5027>| Mobile +1 720.940.0974
> <%2B1%20720.940.0974> *5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 570, Greenwood Village, CO
> 80111
>
>
>
> [image: Fans of InsightSoftware.com]
> <http://www.insightsoftware.com/fans/?utm_source=Employees&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Fans&utm_campaign=Signature>
>
>
>
> *From:* Shervin Afshar [mailto:shervinafshar@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:26 PM
> *To:* Murray Sargent
> *Cc:* www-math@w3.org; Barbara Beeton
> *Subject:* Re: Tie over infinity
>
>
>
>
>
> I asked around and looked it up in some source (including Cajori), but to
> no avail. Any clues about where else to look? Thanks.
>
>
>
> Shervin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Murray Sargent <
> murrays@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Anyone know how "tie over infinity" ⧝ (29DD) is used in mathematics?
>
> Thanks,
> Murray
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is intended
> only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
> should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify the
> sender immediately by email if you have received this email by mistake and
> delete this email from your system.
>
> Our company accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the
> consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided.
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the
> recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of
> viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any
> virus transmitted by this email.
>
> InsightSoftware.com is a Trading Name of 'InsightSoftware.com
> Limited',Registered in England No. 2860790 at 53-55 Uxbridge Road, Ealing,
> London, W5 5SA, United Kingdom, VAT Number: GB 766 8160 95
>

UND July 20, 2014 Important information about the MathML fonts in Gecko 31

Author: Frédéric WANG (fred.wang@free.fr) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

(apologies for possible multiple copies ; feel free to forward this message)

Dear all,

Starting with Gecko 31 (to be released the week of July 22), the 
recommended fonts for the MathML rendering are mathematical fonts with 
an OpenType MATH table [1]. The old math fonts (e.g. MathJax TeX, STIX 
General) are now deprecated in favor of the modern OpenType math fonts 
(e.g. Latin Modern Math, XITS Math, Cambria Math). There are still some 
known bugs/limitations in Gecko, math fonts and systems so that might 
take some time before the migration can be fully done. However, note 
that we plan to remove support for the old fonts in a near future, so 
please upgrade your setup as soon as possible and report any issues you 
find. In particular:

* For Web users: If you installed MathML fonts in the past, please 
consider cleaning up your previous installation. Read [2] for the latest 
documentation of the recommended math fonts. On desktop, if you use 
Windows >= 7 or if you have a TeX distribution installed, it's now 
really likely that you don't need to install additional math fonts. On 
mobile devices, the MathML fonts add-on [3] is still the only option for 
now but we have work-in-progress patches for Android and FirefoxOS. 
Currently, there is not any native feature to configure your preferred 
math fonts, but Firefox users can try the MathML-font-settings add-on [4].

* For Web authors: If you use Web font versions of deprecated math fonts 
(e.g. MathJax TeX or STIX General), perhaps with the help of the 
::-moz-math-stretchy pseudo-element, you should update your pages. The 
rule is now very simple: just apply the desired font-family on the 
<math> elements. You might also provide WOFF fallback or additional 
font-family for the text. Download [5] to get WOFF fonts together with 
CSS stylesheets to use on your Website.

* For software maintainers: Please ensure that an OpenType MATH font is 
available on your system or that the appropriate dependencies for 
Gecko-based programs are set. You might also want to remove obsolete 
fonts or at least drop the dependencies for Gecko-based programs.

* For font designers: You are invited to create your own math fonts and 
test them with Gecko. Note that fontforge has menus and a Python 
interface to do that [6] [7]. Existing math fonts have issues with 
ascent/descent, please be sure that the OS/2 metrics are consistent, so 
that they work the same in all platforms/browsers.

Related news:

* The STIX fonts (STIX-Word set) have an OpenType MATH table, but there 
are known to have many bugs. The STIX Consortium announced version 2.0.0 
for early 2015 but for now, it is recommended to use the XITS fork 
instead [8].

* Partial support for the OpenType MATH table is also available in 
WebKit Nightly and will improve the rendering of MathML operators [9]. 
Requests to make OpenType MATH font installed by default on iOS & Mac 
systems have been submitted to Apple.

[1] Section 6.3.6, 
http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-4/open-font-format/text-isoiec-cd-14496-22-3rd-edition
[2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/MathML_Project/Fonts
[3] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/mathml-fonts/
[4] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/mathml-font-settings/
[5] https://github.com/fred-wang/MathFonts/archive/gh-pages.zip
[6] http://www.fontforge.org/math.html
[7] http://www.fontforge.org/python.html
[8] http://www.stixfonts.org/
[9] https://bug-133569-attachments.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=233418

-- 
Frédéric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

UND July 20, 2014 Firefox 31 MathML Release Notes

Author: Frédéric WANG (fred.wang@free.fr) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Dear all,

Firefox 31 will be released in a couple of days, please find some 
release notes below. As usual, you can check 
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MathML:Home_Page#Last_bugs_fixed and 
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/31#MathML for details.

* Gecko 31:
   - Remove obsolete/non-standard features: font.mathfont-family* 
preferences, ::-moz-math-stretchy pseudo-element, STIX 1.0 beta support.
   - The scale correction is no longer always applied to stretchy 
operators, to follow the TeX / Open Type MATH behavior.
   - Fix some bugs with dotless i's and j's, one-argument mrow and 
invisible operators.
   - lspace/rspace now only have effect on embellished operators inside 
(inferred) mrow.
   - Fix a bug with the columnspacing of rtl mtable.
   - Use Unicode Mathematical alphanumeric characters for 
bold/italic/bold-italic mathvariants
   - Initial implementation of the MathVariants Table of the Open Type 
MATH table. See 
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/MathML_Project/Fonts

* Gecko 32:
   - Implement menclose notation "phasorangle"
   - Other improvements to the MathML stretchy code.

* Gecko 33:
   - Add support for mtable@rowspacing/columnspacing/framespacing attributes
   - Use Open Type MATH constants for fractions, stacks, radicals and 
scripts

-- 
Frédéric Wang
maths-informatique-jeux.com/blog/frederic

UND July 18, 2014 Re: Tie over infinity

Author: Shervin Afshar (shervinafshar@gmail.com) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

I asked around and looked it up in some source (including Cajori), but to
no avail. Any clues about where else to look? Thanks.

Shervin

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Murray Sargent <
murrays@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:

> Anyone know how "tie over infinity" ⧝ (29DD) is used in mathematics?
>
> Thanks,
> Murray
>
>

UND July 17, 2014 Re: Guidance Requested: Cutting and Pasting MathType

Author: Paul Libbrecht (paul@hoplahup.net) | Channel: www-math@w3.org Mail Archives

Michael,

this is an interesting question and I would love it if you manage to publish back answers when you have them.

As far as I understand, you have no other way than really going native in this process since MathType equations are embedded objects.
I would give a last chance from the flash side of the world, which has a tendency to be a tick less protective or to a trusted Java applet which does have full access to the clipboard (we were able to implement the MathML clipboard operations for example within the Wiris OpenMath Input Editor using that, for example).

I would assume that the fine team at Design Science, two of them are on this list at least, would be able to dig out solutions, since they are the makers of MathType. I would expect solutions to be dependent on just about any combination of versions (OS, Word, MathType).

paul

On 12 juil. 2014, at 20:25, Michael <spdrmnky@pacbell.net> wrote:

> Hello, Group -
> 
> Professional Publications, Inc. (ppi2pass.com) publishes content in print, web, and e-book forms containing significant mathematical content. Originally, we were a TEX-based publisher, but we have been steeped in XML/MathML for about a decade. We are trying to implement a process whereby authors who have developed content in Microsoft Word with a MathType plug-in can cut and paste that content into a web form running on a Linux server.  The goal is to retain all/most of the XML/MathML coding of equations, or to have post-processing where we end up with that coding after the submission. That's the bottom line.
> 
> Retaining the coding after cut-and-paste on a Linux-platform has stumped us. (This is specifically a MathType issue, not a Word Equation Editor issue.) Can anyone in this group (a) offer a ray of hope, (b) point to something, or (c) make themselves available for consultation? 
> 
> I've been a member of this group for years, so I apologize if this is an off-topic post. We'll appreciate any guidance for moving forwards.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Michael R. Lindeburg, PE
> President
> Professional Publications, Inc.
> mlindeburg@ppi2pass.com
> (650) 593-9119 ext. 123
>