ISSUE-10: What is a first party?
What is a first party?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Current
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-21
- Description:
- As an example, CBS and C|Net are the same company but visually distinct websites/brand, is this a first party relationship?
Note change proposal: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Party_Definitions - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-27 on Thomas Lowenthal to Write-up the consensus for what is a first party on ISSUE-10 - due 2011-11-07, closedACTION-35 on Thomas Lowenthal to Tom & Jonathan to merge their definitions on consent, defining 1st & 3rd parties - due 2011-11-14, closedACTION-34 on Jonathan Mayer to Draft Near-Consensus First Party vs. Third Party Section with Tom - due 2011-11-25, closedACTION-44 on Shane Wiley to Also write additional examples around branding for first parties by next week - due 2012-01-11, closedACTION-48 on Rigo Wenning to Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 to re-draft (3) - due 2012-02-03, closedACTION-411 on Jeffrey Chester to Review issue-10 on first party text before moving to pending review - due 2013-05-29, closed- Related emails:
- Re: Signals for internal / external usage of site elements (the signals formerly called "1" and "3") (from singer@apple.com on 2014-01-09)
- Re: Chairs' decisions on Calls for Objection on tracking/party definitions (ISSUE-5, ISSUE-10) (from singer@apple.com on 2013-12-18)
- Re: Chairs' decisions on Calls for Objection on tracking/party definitions (ISSUE-5, ISSUE-10) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-12-18)
- Re: Chairs' decisions on Calls for Objection on tracking/party definitions (ISSUE-5, ISSUE-10) (from singer@apple.com on 2013-12-18)
- Re: Chairs' decisions on Calls for Objection on tracking/party definitions (ISSUE-5, ISSUE-10) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-12-18)
- RE: Chairs' decisions on Calls for Objection on tracking/party definitions (ISSUE-5, ISSUE-10) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-12-18)
- Chairs' decisions on Calls for Objection on tracking/party definitions (ISSUE-5, ISSUE-10) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-12-17)
- Re: Agenda for December 11, 2013 call (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-12-10)
- Re: Agenda for December 11, 2013 call (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-12-10)
- RE: Agenda for December 11, 2013 call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-12-10)
- Agenda for December 11, 2013 call (from ninja@w3.org on 2013-12-10)
- Concerns with ISSUE-161 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-12-04)
- Updated Agenda for December 04, 2013 call - V02 (from ninja@w3.org on 2013-12-03)
- Draft Agenda for December 04, 2013 call - V01 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-12-03)
- Agenda for November 20, 2013 call (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-11-19)
- Re: Call for Objections on ISSUES -16 and -204 (definitions of collect/retain/use/share/facilitates collection) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-14)
- Re: Call for Objections on ISSUES -16 and -204 (definitions of collect/retain/use/share/facilitates collection) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-11-14)
- Re: Call for Objections on ISSUES -16 and -204 (definitions of collect/retain/use/share/facilitates collection) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-14)
- Re: Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-13)
- Re: Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2013-11-13)
- Re: Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-13)
- Re: Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2013-11-13)
- Re: Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-13)
- Re: Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-13)
- Issue-5 Option C: No Definition (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-13)
- Agenda for November 13, 2013 call (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-11-12)
- Re: Agenda for November 13, 2013 call (from singer@apple.com on 2013-11-12)
- Agenda for November 13, 2013 call (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-11)
- Re: Call for objections (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-11)
- Re: Call for objections (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-11)
- Re: Call for objections (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-08)
- RE: Call for objections (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-11-08)
- Re: Call for objections (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-08)
- RE: Call for objections (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-11-08)
- Re: Call for objections (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-08)
- Re: Call for objections (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-11-08)
- RE: [Call for Objections] Party definitions (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-11-08)
- RE: Call for objections (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-11-08)
- Re: Call for objections (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-08)
- Re: Agenda for November 06 (from tien@eff.org on 2013-11-08)
- Call for objections (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-11-08)
- [Call for Objections] Party definitions (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-11-08)
- Fwd: Agenda for November 06 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-11-06)
- RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-10-30)
- RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2013-10-30)
- Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-10-30)
- Re: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion (from chris.mejia@iab.net on 2013-10-30)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-30)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-30)
- Issue-5 Proposal-7 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-10-30)
- RE: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-10-30)
- ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-30)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-30)
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-29)
- Agenda for tomorrow (from cargill@adobe.com on 2013-10-29)
- ISSUE-10: Discoverability (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-24)
- Re: Agenda 10.23.13 - Input on ISSUE-5 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-23)
- Agenda 10.23.13 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-21)
- Re: Additional documentation for Issue-229 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-19)
- Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-15)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-15)
- Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-09)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-09)
- Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-08)
- Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-08)
- Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-08)
- New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-10-08)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-08)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-07)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-07)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-07)
- ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-04)
- Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-03)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-03)
- Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from robsherman@fb.com on 2013-10-03)
- Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-02)
- Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-02)
- TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V02) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-02)
- ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (from kathy@esomar.org on 2013-10-02)
- Agenda for the October 02 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-10-01)
- Re: proposed short-term changes to TCS (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-09-28)
- Re: Party definition, was: Re: proposed short-term changes to TCS (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-09-28)
- Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-09-28)
- Agenda for the Sept 25 call (V01) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-09-24)
- Re: Party definition, was: Re: proposed short-term changes to TCS (ISSUE-10) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-09-23)
- Re: Party definition, was: Re: proposed short-term changes to TCS (ISSUE-10) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-09-23)
- Re: June Change proposal: definition of first party (Issue-10) (from tlr@w3.org on 2013-07-01)
- Re: June Change proposal: definition of first party (Issue-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-06-26)
- Re: June Change proposal: definition of first party (Issue-10) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-06-26)
- Re: June Change proposal: definition of first party (Issue-10) (from tien@eff.org on 2013-06-26)
- Re: June Change proposal: definition of first party (Issue-10) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-25)
- June Change proposal: definition of first party (Issue-10) (from tien@eff.org on 2013-06-25)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-21)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from ylagos@futureofprivacy.org on 2013-05-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-19)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
- Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-07)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-07)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-03-06)
- RE: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2013-03-06)
- RE: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ACTION-273; ACTION-368; ISSUE-10; Definitions related to first party, multiple first party, service provider/data processor (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ACTION-273; ACTION-368; ISSUE-10; Definitions related to first party, multiple first party, service provider/data processor (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2013-03-06)
- RE: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2013-03-06)
- ACTION-273; ACTION-368; ISSUE-10; Definitions related to first party, multiple first party, service provider/data processor (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-03-06)
- ACTION-273/ISSUE-181 (. . . multiple first parties) and ISSUE-10 (what is a first party?) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-03-06)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-03)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-01)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-03-01)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-01)
- RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from singer@apple.com on 2013-03-01)
- RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
- Re: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-28)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-02-28)
- RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from heatherwest@google.com on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-02-27)
- RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
- ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
- Re: Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2013-01-23)
- Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-01-22)
- Updated response to Aleecia's Template, Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue-19, Issue-22, Issue-24, Issue-25, Issue-31, Issue-49, Issue-73 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-04-07)
- deeper look at agenda items (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-07)
- Aleecia's Template for Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue 19 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-04-06)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-04-05)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-04-05)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-04-05)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from clay.webster@cbsinteractive.com on 2012-04-05)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-04-05)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from clay.webster@cbsinteractive.com on 2012-04-05)
- Re: Issue Maintenance (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-29)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-03-28)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-28)
- Revised template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-28)
- template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-03-27)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-27)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-26)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-25)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-22)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-22)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-21)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-21)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-21)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-20)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-20)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-18)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-16)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-16)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-03-15)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-03-14)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
- RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-13)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
- Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
- Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
- RE: Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-16)
- Agenda for 2012-Feb-14 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-16)
- Issue-10 housekeeping (was Re: technical, business, legal definitions) (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-12)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-01-23)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-01-20)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-01-13)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-01-11)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-10)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-10)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-09)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from cedric@laurant.org on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-01-06)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-01-06)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from heatherwest@google.com on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-04)
- Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-01-03)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-12-23)
- Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-12-22)
- Re: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-15)
- RE: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-11-10)
- Re: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-09)
- RE: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-11-09)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-11-09 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2011-11-09)
- Re: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-11-08)
- Re: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-08)
- RE: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-08)
- User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties] (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-11-08)
- Agenda for 2011-11-09 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-11-08)
- Re: Proposed First Party definition (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-14)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-09)
- Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04)
- Definitions: 1st vs 3rd Party [ISSUE-10,ISSUE-14] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-04)
- Re: Facebook tracking (from fran@fb.com on 2011-09-26)
- Re: Facebook tracking (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-09-25)
- Facebook tracking (from karld@opera.com on 2011-09-25)
- ISSUE-10: What is a first party? As an example, CBS and C|Net are the same company but visually distinct websites/brand, is this a first party relationship? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
Related notes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Oct/0248.html
Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 11:13:53http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2011Oct/0288.html - Bjorn on search boxes
Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 11:15:42Community Response 2012-01-08: Our acceptance of the Mayer-Lowenthal approach turns partly on its careful refusal to permit tracking by commonly branded affiliates under DNT: 1. Commonly branded affiliates may be in very different types of businesses and the fact that they share a corporate name is no guarantee that consumers will understand who they are or what they might do with their information.
Matthias Schunter, 30 Jan 2012, 17:25:28Call for Objections: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-party-10/
Justin Brookman, 13 Nov 2013, 23:06:13Pursuant to the Chairs' decision to the Call for Objections, party/first party/third party is defined as:
A party is a natural person, a legal entity, or a set of legal entities that share common owner(s), common controller(s), and a group identity that is easily discoverable by a user. Common branding or providing a list of affiliates that is available via a link from a resource where a party describes DNT practices are examples of ways to provide this discoverability.
Within the context of a given user action, a first party is a party with which the user intends to interact, via one or more network interactions, as a result of making that action. Merely hovering over, muting, pausing, or closing a given piece of content does not constitute a user's intent to interact with another party.
In some cases, a resource on the Web will be jointly controlled by two or more distinct parties. Each of those parties is considered a first party if a user would reasonably expect to communicate with all of them when accessing that resource. For example, prominent co-branding on the resource might lead a user to expect that multiple parties are responsible for the content or functionality.
For any data collected as a result of one or more network interactions resulting from a user's action, a third party is any party other than that user, a first party for that user action, or a service provider acting on behalf of either that user or that first party.
Display change log