ACTION-48: Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 to re-draft (3)
Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 to re-draft (3)
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Rigo Wenning
- Due on:
- February 3, 2012
- Created on:
- January 24, 2012
- Associated Issue:
- ISSUE-10
- Related emails:
- Re: [ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2012-02-12)
- Re: Housekeeping from today's call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Housekeeping from today's call (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-08)
- Housekeeping from today's call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-08)
- RE: [ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-02-08)
- [ACTION-48] Re-phrase 3.6.1.2.1 (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-03)
Related notes:
The current text requires a first party to have a legally enforceable contract with its provider so that the provider can only use data collected on first party site for the benefit of the first party only. The text then goes on to say that end users and regulators must also have the rights to legally enforce this obligation against the provider.
It would legally extremely challenging to make this latter part enforceable, and I would recommend removing language regarding user/regulator enforceability as unworkable.
Action is on Rigo, Amy and Meme to strike this text and come up with a footnote with legal text explaining what measures could be taken in the absence of a text.
This was taken care of in the latest Draft of the Tracking Compliance Specification that does not contain that wording anymore
Rigo Wenning, 27 May 2013, 07:55:59Display change log.