ISSUE-1  Jonathan Jeon | 
RAISED | 
Proposed use cases on Generic POI use | 
2010-11-17 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-2   orgs-vs-places | 
RAISED | 
Organisations versus places: should POI core spec say how to distinguish these? | 
2011-03-29 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-3  poi-brands | 
RAISED | 
Core POI spec should provide a way to indicate families of POI, such as commercial brands (eg. starbucks) | 
2011-03-29 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-5  event-descriptions | 
RAISED | 
 Do we deal with event descriptions (eg. movie screenings) by making them POIs, or by describing their relationship to POIs? | 
2011-03-29 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-6  | 
RAISED | 
What AR is our scope  | 
2011-03-30 | 
 | 
0 | 
ISSUE-7  repeating-time | 
RAISED | 
Can we find another standard to reuse for representing repeating times and timespans? | 
2011-03-30 | 
Core FPWD | 
1 | 
ISSUE-8  internationalization | 
RAISED | 
What are our internationalization issues? | 
2011-03-31 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-9  id-required | 
RAISED | 
Is an ID required within a POI itself? | 
2011-03-31 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-10  label-required | 
RAISED | 
Should we require a label for POIs? | 
2011-03-31 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-13  pois-more-than-location | 
RAISED | 
Are POIs more than locations? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-14  reinventing-the-wheel? | 
RAISED | 
Are we needlessly reinventing?  Don't other standards cover this? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-15  georeference-location-relationship | 
RAISED | 
What is the relationship between a georeference and a location? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-16  handling-multiple-locations | 
RAISED | 
How do you represent multiple locations for a POI in an AR app? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-17  dynamic-pois | 
RAISED | 
How are POIs with dynamic properties represented? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-18  including-data | 
RAISED | 
How should data about a POI be included?  | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-19  point-encoding | 
RAISED | 
How should we represent points? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-20  line-encoding | 
RAISED | 
How should we represent lines? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-21  specifying-coordinate-system | 
RAISED | 
How should we specify the coordinate system used? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-22  polygon-encoding | 
RAISED | 
How should we represent polygons? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-23  multi-languages | 
RAISED | 
How should we handle multiple labels/languages? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-24  categories-encoding | 
RAISED | 
How to represent categories? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
1 | 
ISSUE-26  time-encoding | 
RAISED | 
How do we represent times? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-28  poi-collections-wrapper | 
RAISED | 
Do we need/want multiple POIs in one XML document? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-31  establishing-relationships | 
RAISED | 
How do we establish a relative relationship between two points? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-39  xml-schema | 
RAISED | 
How to represent XML schema? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-40  address-representation | 
RAISED | 
How do we want to represent addresses? | 
2011-05-11 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-42  POI type identification | 
RAISED | 
How do we specify a POI is of a particular type?   | 
2011-06-13 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-43  | 
RAISED | 
Do we want polygons to have complex topology with holes, etc | 
2011-07-21 | 
 | 
0 | 
ISSUE-44  | 
RAISED | 
How to represent natural relationships, e.g. "near" | 
2011-07-21 | 
 | 
0 | 
ISSUE-45  | 
RAISED | 
Can we use Category to more  meta data than just categories, e.g. ratings, menu, close/open hours | 
2011-07-21 | 
 | 
0 | 
ISSUE-46  | 
RAISED | 
Can we add attributes to link to support orientation, location, etc? | 
2011-07-21 | 
 | 
0 | 
ISSUE-47  Metadata inline | 
RAISED | 
Metadata - What to do? | 
2011-07-25 | 
Core FPWD | 
0 | 
ISSUE-48  | 
RAISED | 
How do we handle provenance and other attribution type data? | 
2011-09-19 | 
 | 
0 | 
ISSUE-49  | 
RAISED | 
There is some concern that making all single instance datatypes as attributes will make conversion between POIs and RDF more difficult | 
2011-11-17 | 
 | 
0 |