ISSUE-19: How should we represent points?

point-encoding

How should we represent points?

State:

RAISED

Product:

Core FPWD

Raised by:

Raj Singh

Opened on:

2011-05-11

Description:

From: rsingh@opengeospatial.org
Date: Wed May 04 18:22:24 2011
Archived: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poiwg/2011May/0007.html

[[
CHANGE:
<point latitude="42.360890561289295" longitude="-71.09139204025269"/>
TO:
<gml:Point><gml:pos>42.360890561289295 -71.09139204025269</gml:pos></gml:Point>

CHANGE:
<point id="mainpoint" latitude="27.174799" longitude="78.042111" altitude="10m"/>
TO:
<gml:Point id="mainpoint" srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.6:4979" srsDimension="3">
<gml:pos>27.174799 78.042111 10</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>

]]

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: 'geo:' URIs (from jens@layar.com on 2011-06-28)
2. 'geo:' URIs (from alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at on 2011-06-27)
3. Re: Agenda June 23, 2011 (from ronald@layar.com on 2011-06-23)
4. Re: Agenda June 23, 2011 (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-23)
5. Agenda June 23, 2011 (from ahill@gatech.edu on 2011-06-23)
6. Re: Agenda 16 June 2011 (from creed@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-17)
7. Minutes 16 June 2011 POIWG Teleconference (from mdw@w3.org on 2011-06-16)
8. Agenda 16 June 2011 (from mdw@w3.org on 2011-06-16)
9. Agenda June 16, 2011 (from ahill@gatech.edu on 2011-06-15)
10. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-15)
11. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from darkflame@gmail.com on 2011-06-15)
12. RE: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from karl.seiler@navteq.com on 2011-06-15)
13. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from jens@layar.com on 2011-06-15)
14. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-13)
15. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from darkflame@gmail.com on 2011-06-13)
16. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from darkflame@gmail.com on 2011-06-12)
17. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-10)
18. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from jens@layar.com on 2011-06-10)
19. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-08)
20. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-08)
21. RE: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from karl.seiler@navteq.com on 2011-06-08)
22. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from ahill@gatech.edu on 2011-06-08)
23. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from darkflame@gmail.com on 2011-06-08)
24. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-06)
25. Re: ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from darkflame@gmail.com on 2011-06-06)
26. can we decide on geography representation this week? (from rsingh@opengeospatial.org on 2011-06-06)
27. Minutes POI Teleconference 12 May 2011 (from mdw@w3.org on 2011-05-12)
28. POI Core Strawman: ISSUE-19: How should we represent points? (from mdw@w3.org on 2011-05-11)
29. ISSUE-19 (point-encoding): How should we represent points? [Core FPWD] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-11)

Related notes:

Display change log