W3C WBS Home

Results of Questionnaire UAWG Survey for 12 July 2012

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2012-07-25 to 2012-08-10.

5 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Proposed 3.2.2 Back Button

1. Proposed 3.2.2 Back Button

Proposed 3.2.2

from email

3.2.2 Back Button: The user can reverse recognized hyperlink navigation actions (e.g. via a back button or equivalent). (Level AA) Note: This may include actions by the user (e.g. activating a link to a new page or a new anchor within the same page) as well as some content actions, such as auto-redirection.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Agree with the proposal 3
Disagree with the proposal
Neutral, will accept consensus of the group 1
Suggest the following changes to the proposal 1

Details

Responder Proposed 3.2.2 Back Button3.2.2
Jan Richards Agree with the proposal
Jim Allan Suggest the following changes to the proposal need something about "except where prevented by the author/application for financial or other types of transactions"
Greg Lowney Neutral, will accept consensus of the group I could live with it, but I'd prefer if it covered navigation by entering a URI (e.g. typing into the address bar) and choosing from the navigation history (which might or might not be considered a hyperlink).

We could keep the proposed wording, or use something like one of these:

3.2.2 Back Button: The user can reverse recognized navigation actions caused by hyperlinks or address entry (e.g. via a back button or equivalent). (Level AA)

3.2.2 Back Button: The user can reverse recognized navigation between web addresses [or "URIs", or "web resources"?] (e.g. standard "back button" functionality). (Level AA).

The Intent should recommend multi-level undo for navigation, rather than just single-level. Also, does the current wording imply strongly enough that state should be restored to the amount feasible for the page?
Kimberly Patch Agree with the proposal
Kelly Ford Agree with the proposal

More details on responses

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
  2. Eric Hansen <ehansen@ets.org>
  3. Catherine Laws <claws@us.ibm.com>
  4. Markku Hakkinen <mhakkinen@ets.org>
  5. Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
  6. Peter Parente <pparent@us.ibm.com>
  7. Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
  8. Takeshi Kurosawa <kurosawa-takeshi@mitsue.co.jp>
  9. Alan Cantor <alan@cantoraccess.com>
  10. Jeanne F Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
  11. Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>
  12. Wei Wu <wuwei@w3.org>

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire


Completed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org) on an original design by Michael Sperberg-McQueen $Id: showv.php3,v 1.123 2013-09-26 09:46:56 dom Exp $. Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to dom@w3.org with w3t-sys@w3.org copied (if your mail client supports it, send mail directly to the right persons)