W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 4 November 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-11-04 to 2016-11-09.

10 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions of 4 November 2016
  2. Carousels Tutorial Review
  3. Page Structure Tutorial Review
  4. Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?

1. Resolutions of 4 November 2016

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 4 November 2016 EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The  summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! 8
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 1
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. 1
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolutions of 4 November 2016Comments
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
 +1 to publishing the Planning and Managing pages

+1 to Easy Checks - one check.

From the minutes:
"RESOLUTION: The Easy Checks will be published (no longer a draft) with the addition of the Moving, Flashing or Blinking check as one check."
...
"Caleb: We have some work to do on illustrations and then will be ready to go."

I thought we were just agreeing to this one check this week and the final publication approval would come later, after the illustration work and any other clean up was done. *However*, I think all that is very minor and probably doesn't change the content much at all -- so EOWG really doesn't need to review it (and probably doesn't want to :).

Therefore, I'm fine with the resolution to publish when other cleanup is done - yet I'm thinking it would be good to do an fyi e-mail to EOWG when it's all done and before it goes out -- not a "we're waiting for replies before publishing" (since got approval in this telecon and people had chance to review in this survey) but a "speak up if any concerns" (since some minor things will have changed).
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Robert Jolly
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Caleb Watson
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
  • James Green
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Laura Keen
  • Robert Jolly
  • Caleb Watson
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Andrew Arch
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Carousels Tutorial Review

summary | by responder | by choice

Please skim the Carousels tutorial overall to re-familiarize yourself with how the topics are presented.

Note that some sections are still in an editor’s draft and will change. Where applicable, considerations and issues on GitHub are mentioned.

If you have any comments, please submit them to this Pull Request (preferred) or in the comments box below.

For comparison, here are all pages from the carousels tutorial, the previous versions and an version highlighting differences:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have looked at it, and I have the following comments. 6
I have looked at it, and I have no comments. 2
I didn’t get to it by the closing date of the survey but promise to be prepared for the F2F. :-)

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Carousels Tutorial ReviewComments
James Green
Shawn Lawton Henry I am focusing my time on the other topics for the F2F.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Provided some suggestions in GitHub
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Carousel Concepts - under Why is it important? 2nd Paragraph, functionality spelled incorrectly - and i think they're trying to use the word functionality.

I don't like the structure of the Functionality page, very code heavy - prefer the idea of a carousel styling page to break it up into 2 pages.
Laura Keen
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 I've added my comments to github.
Robert Jolly
  • I have looked at it, and I have no comments.
Caleb Watson
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Very clear and well done!
Sharron Rush
  • I have looked at it, and I have no comments.
Brent Bakken
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Added comments to the pull request.
Andrew Arch
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 on https://w3c.github.io/wai-tutorials/carousels/animations/ the play/stop button should be visible so that visual users distracted by movement can toggle

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Laura Keen
  • Caleb Watson
  • Brent Bakken
  • Andrew Arch
I have looked at it, and I have no comments.
  • Robert Jolly
  • Sharron Rush
I didn’t get to it by the closing date of the survey but promise to be prepared for the F2F. :-)

3. Page Structure Tutorial Review

summary | by responder | by choice

Please skim the Page Structure tutorial overall to re-familiarize yourself with how the topics are presented.

Note that some sections are still in an editor’s draft and will change. Where applicable, considerations and issues on GitHub are mentioned.

If you have any comments, please submit them to this Pull Request (preferred) or in the comments box below.

For comparison, here are all pages from the page structure tutorial, the previous versions and an version highlighting differences:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have looked at it, and I have the following comments. 8
I have looked at it, and I have no comments. 1
I didn’t get to it by the closing date of the survey but promise to be prepared for the F2F. :-)

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Page Structure Tutorial ReviewComments
James Green
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 content looks good, I would add an image - something along the lines of https://www.paciellogroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/rotor.gif or http://accessibleculture.org/research-files/ozewai2011/images/html5AriaTestCase.png
Shawn Lawton Henry I am focusing my time on the other topics for the F2F.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Sent some thoughts to Eric
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Page Structure opening page - why is it important - cognitive is spelled wrong. Agree with editor notes that are marked.


Laura Keen
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 I've added comments to github.
Robert Jolly
  • I have looked at it, and I have no comments.
Caleb Watson
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 I think you should leave the role=search in this Page Regions since it is such a common component of websites and apps (and it usually persists across layouts).
Sharron Rush
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 in GitHUb
Brent Bakken
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 Added comments to pull request. The structure of this tutorial looks good as well. Understand that more content is coming later.
Andrew Arch
  • I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
 agree with idea of moving " HTML5 algorithm" note out of main content on Headings page

Good stuff on Styling page

Overall - looking like a great resource

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have looked at it, and I have the following comments.
  • James Green
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Laura Keen
  • Caleb Watson
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
  • Andrew Arch
I have looked at it, and I have no comments.
  • Robert Jolly
I didn’t get to it by the closing date of the survey but promise to be prepared for the F2F. :-)

4. Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?

Please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to team-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.

Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:

Thursday - 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
WebEx Link or Audio connection: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number, Meeting number: 314 241 816 Passcode: (same as main EOWG teleconference)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes
no 8

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?Comments
James Green no
Shawn Lawton Henry no
Shadi Abou-Zahra no
Kris Anne Kinney no
Laura Keen no
Robert Jolly
Caleb Watson no
Sharron Rush no
Brent Bakken no
Andrew Arch

More details on responses

  • James Green: last responded on 4, November 2016 at 16:45 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 8, November 2016 at 15:35 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 8, November 2016 at 20:34 (UTC)
  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 8, November 2016 at 20:54 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 9, November 2016 at 14:34 (UTC)
  • Robert Jolly: last responded on 9, November 2016 at 19:32 (UTC)
  • Caleb Watson: last responded on 9, November 2016 at 20:22 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 9, November 2016 at 22:43 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 9, November 2016 at 22:49 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 10, November 2016 at 02:40 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Sylvie Duchateau
  3. Kazuhito Kidachi
  4. Jedi Lin
  5. David Sloan
  6. Mary Jo Mueller
  7. Vicki Menezes Miller
  8. Reinaldo Ferraz
  9. Bill Kasdorf
  10. Cristina Mussinelli
  11. Kevin White
  12. Kevin Rydberg
  13. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  14. Adina Halter
  15. Denis Boudreau
  16. Sarah Pulis
  17. Bill Tyler
  18. Gregorio Pellegrino
  19. Ruoxi Ran
  20. Jennifer Chadwick
  21. Sean Kelly
  22. Muhammad Saleem
  23. Sarah Lewthwaite
  24. Daniel Montalvo
  25. Mark Palmer
  26. Jade Matos Carew
  27. Sonsoles López Pernas
  28. Greta Krafsig
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.