W3C | TAG

W3C TAG meeting 6-8 June 2011 in Cambridge, MA, USA

Back row: Noah Mendelsohn, Dan Appelquist, Henry Thompson, Larry Masinter, Ashok Malhotra, Jonathan Rees
Front row: Jeni Tennison, Tim Berners-Lee, Yves Lafon

Agenda Summary

Logistics

Preparation

See "(required reading)" annotations in agenda items below.

Agenda Details

1. Convene, review agenda
   • Scribes: TAG members are encouraged to sign up for scribing by using CVS to edit scribing assignments table, or by emailing the chair
   • Roll call
   • Approve minutes of teleconferences:
     • 26 May 2011
   • F2F Main Goals:
     • Commit to 2011 deliverables
     • Prepare client-side state finding for publication (unless we decide there's too much more to do on #! and/or RDFa use of fragids
     • Align TAG product pages and assignments with actual TAG deliverables and priorities
     • More: TBD
2. TAG Priorities for 2011
   • Goals:
     • Identify key success criteria for TAG's work in 2011
     • Fill out missing TAG product pages, and a grid showing assignment of TAG members to products. By doing this, we will produce a clearer plan for the content, form, and expected date of TAG deliverables to achieve those goals.
   • Background (these mainly relate to Web Applications, but our discussion or priorities will not be limited to Web Apps):
     • TAG Product Pages linked from List of TAG Product Pages (the chair hopes to add to these between now and the start of the F2F)
     • TAG member assignments grid (very preliminary — source .xls )
     • ACTION-434: on - Daniel Appelquist - Prepare discussion of structure of what we want to do about web apps architecture... - Due: 2010-10-18 - CLOSED
     • May 2010 notes from DanA on ACTION-434: Web Application Architecture (these were prepared for the June 2010 F2F)
     • Email thread beginning with: Re: ACTION-434: Some notes on organizing discussion on WebApps architecture
     • Email from Larry Masinter: progress on web applications architecture: a few thoughts
     • ACTION-499: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Prepare product description page for work on IETF presentation. - Due: 2011-03-01 - CLOSED
     • ACTION-522: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Build Tracker product page for HTML/XML Unification - Due: 2011-05-17 - PENDING REVIEW
     • ACTION-523: on - Ashok Malhotra - (with help from Noah) build good product page for client storage finding, identifying top questions to be answered on client side storage - Due: 2011-04-05 - OPEN
     • ACTION-526: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Do first draft product stuff for MIME and related core web mechanisms - Due: 2011-05-17 - PENDING REVIEW
     • ACTION-528: on - Henry Thompson - Create and get consensus on a product page and tracker product page for persistence of names - Due: 2011-05-16 - OPEN
     • ACTION-529: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule telcon discussion of a potential TAG product relating to offline applications and packaged Web - Due: 2011-02-17 - CLOSED
     • ACTION-554: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Formulate product page for TAG work on security including John Kemp security draft Due: 2011-05-24 - Due: 2011-05-31 - OPEN
3. ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-60): Web Applications: Client-side state
   • Goals:
     • Prepare for publication of a TAG finding on Identifying Application State
     • Review the 15 May 2011 Draft of Identifying Application State. Ashok's announcement email indicates that changes are in sections 3, 4, 5 & 6. (the entire draft is required reading)
   • Background:
     • 15 May 2011 Draft of Identifying Application State (required reading). Supercedes: 31 March 2011 Draft of Repurposing the Hash Sign for the New Web
     • Discussion of client-side state on 28 April 2011
     • 8 Feb 2011 F2F discussion of client-side state draft
     • Jeni Tennison's blog post on #!
     • Noah Mendelsohn's blog post Documents in applications
     • ACTION-533: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule TAG discussion of #! (check with Yves) [self-assigne] - Due: 2011-04-05 - CLOSED
     • ACTION-481: on - Ashok Malhotra - Update client-side state document with help from Raman - Due: 2011-05-10 - OPEN
     • ACTION-508: on - Larry Masinter - Draft proposed bug report against HTML5 media type registration regarding interpretation of fragid in HTML-based AJAX apps - Due: 2011-04-19 - OPEN
4. Internet "Buffer Bloat"
   • Goals:
     • Hear a presentation from HTTP 1.1 co-editor Jim Gettys on "buffer bloat", and on the possible need to reconsider the design of HTTP
   • Background:
     • TCP/IP flow control depends on packets being dropped when networks congest — unfortunately, many routers, OS's etc. are buffering excessively rather than dropping packets, resulting in latencies of up to .5 seconds, blocking not just the stream in question, but other "real time" traffic such as Skype, DNS resolution, etc.
     • Jim believes that HTTP as currently designed does not use the lower levels of the TCP/IP stack effectively, and is contributing to the problem. He believes that a significant redesign may be desirable.
     • Jim's IETF Prague Presentation on Buffer Bloat (required reading - multiple formats avaialble)
5. ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-60): Web Applications: Client-side Storage
   • Goals:
     • Decide whether we're serious about moving on ACTION-475: on - Ashok Malhotra - Write finding on client-side storage, DanA to review - Due: 2011-05-24 - OPEN
     • Discuss Slides from Ashok to be presented at this F2F
     • Get organized for further work in this area. What are specific goals in terms of questions to be answered for the community, dates and deliverables? TAG "Product page" needed?
     • Currently tracking under ISSUE-60, which is the same one we're using for more transient client-side state. Is ISSUE-60 appropriate for both?
   • Background:
     • Required reading: Slides from Ashok to be presented at this F2F (announcement email)
     • From discussion of storage at Feb 2011 F2F:

       NM: Assuming this is a separate document, what are the top three questions it will answer for the community?

       AM: Give me three weeks

       NM: OK, let's suspend judgement on the long-term future of this work until we see your response

     • Ashok' slides from Feb 2011 F2F "Client-Side Storage" (ppt, pdf)
     • Required reading: Client-side Storage : this version was prepared for the October 2010 F2F
     • ACTION-475: on - Ashok Malhotra - Write finding on client-side storage, DanA to review - Due: 2011-05-24 - OPEN
     • ACTION-482: on - Ashok Malhotra - Write a draft on client-side storage with help from DanA Due: 2010-11-30 - Due: 2010-10-27 - CLOSED -- it was noted that this action was redundant with ACTION-475
6. Web Applications: Design of APIs for Web Applications (minimization)
   • Goals:
     • Review Data Minimization in Web APIs: Draft TAG Finding 05 June 2011 a new draft from Dan on API minmization, promised for 3 June 2011 (not required reading, due to late arrival)
     • Decide whether the TAG wants to produce a Finding on Design of APIs for Web Applications
   • Background:
     • Data Minimization in Web APIs: Draft TAG Finding 05 June 2011
     • Brief discussion on 12 May 2011
     • Discussion at Feb 2011 TAG F2F
     • ACTION-514: on - Daniel Appelquist - Draft finding on API minimization Due: 2011-02-01 - Due: 2011-01-27 - OPEN
     • From previous F2F: Dan Appelquist writeup on API Design - (announcement email)
     • ACTION-461: on - Daniel Appelquist - Draft "finding" on Web Apps API design - Due: 2010-12-31 - CLOSED
7. ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-60): Web Applications: Fragment ID Semantics and MIME Types
   • Goals:
     • make decision on direction we take on RDFa Core (ACTION-509)
     • agree text for MIME and the Web draft on fragids (ACTION-543)
     • make decision (again) on direction we take on 3023bis (application/xml)
     • identify other actions to resolve fragid issues
   • Background:
     • E-mail from Jeni Tennison suggesting an agenda and reading for this session (Jeni's note is itself required reading)
     • Current specifications
       • Pertinent section of RFC 3986 (required reading)
       • Pertinent sections of AWWW (Fragment identifiers, Representation Types and Internet Media Types) (required reading)
     • Other reading (not required - from Jeni's e-mail)

        a. New XML mime type definition
           - 3023bis [DRAFT]
               http://www.w3.org/2006/02/son-of-3023/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-04.html#frag
           - XPointer framework
               http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/
       
        b. Hashbangs
          - HTML mime type definition
              http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2854.txt
          - XHTML mime type definition
              http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3236.txt
       
        c. Images and video
          - media type fragments [DRAFT]
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-media-frags-20110317/
          - SVG mime type definition [DRAFT?]
              http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/msg01153.html
       
        d. Semantic web
          - application/rdf+xml mime type definition
              http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3870.txt
          - RDFa core
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdfa-core-20110331/
          - Turtle [to be updated by RDF WG]
              http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/turtle
          - N3 [submission]
              http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2011/SUBM-n3-20110328/#sec-mediaReg
          - N-triples
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-testcases-20040210/#ntriples
          - Manchester OWL Syntax [NOTE]
              http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-owl2-manchester-syntax-20091027/#Appendix:_Internet_Media_Type.2C_File_Extension_and_Macintosh_File_Type
       

     • ACTION-553: on - Jeni Tennison - With Jonathan to prepare F2F discussion of fragids including #!, RDFa, 3023bis, etc. - Due: 2011-05-19 - OPEN
     • 10 March 2011 discussion of #! URIs
     • See also related agenda item on client-side state at this F2F
     • Discussion of client-side state on 28 April 2011
     • Jeni Tennison's blog post on #!
     • Noah Mendelsohn's blog post Documents in applications
     • ACTION-481: on - Ashok Malhotra - Update client-side state document with help from Raman - Due: 2011-05-10 - OPEN
     • ACTION-508: on - Larry Masinter - Draft proposed bug report against HTML5 media type registration regarding interpretation of fragid in HTML-based AJAX apps - Due: 2011-04-19 - OPEN
     • ACTION-533: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule TAG discussion of #! (check with Yves) [self-assigne] - Due: 2011-04-05 - CLOSED
8. Product: Coordination with IAB/IETF on architecture of web applications: Joint session with Internet Architecture Board
   • Goal:
     • Discuss technical topics of mutual interest with the Internet Architecture Board
   • Background:
     • Please see draft agenda for IAB/TAG discussions
     • TAG panel participation at IETF meeting in Prague (slides, TAG post facto discussion)
     • ACTION-549: on - Larry Masinter - (with help from Henry and Yves) make proposals for topics to be pursued with IAB - Due: 2011-06-02 - OPEN
     • ACTION-460: on - Daniel Appelquist - Coordinate with IAB regarding next steps on privacy policy - Due: 2011-05-24 - OPEN
     • ACTION-497: on - Larry Masinter - Prepare us for a teleconference with IETF-IAB on possible prague IETF presentation. - Due: 2010-12-21 - CLOSED
9. ISSUE-57 (HttpRedirections-57), ISSUE-63 (metadataArchitecture-63) and ISSUE-14 (HttpRange-14) : URI Definition Discovery; Metadata Architecture
   • Goals:
     • Review two new drafts prepared by Jonathan
     • Continue work toward a finding on metadata architecture
   • Background:
     • A diagram from Jonathan
     • Information Resources and Web Metadata: Editor's Draft 17 May 2011 by Jonathan Rees (announcement email) — required reading
     • Providing and discovering definitions of URIs: Editor's Draft 31 May 2011 by Jonathan Rees (announcement email — required reading
     • Wiki page on httpRange014 (optional reading)
     • See also: ACTION-201: on - Jonathan Rees - Report on status of AWWSW discussions - Due: 2011-05-23 - OPEN
     • See also: ACTION-282: on - Jonathan Rees - Draft a finding on metadata architecture. - Due: 2011-05-23 - OPEN
     • See also: ACTION-413: on - Dan Connolly - Suggest a path thru some logic terminology that might speed up httpSemantics discussions - Due: 2010-05-07 - CLOSED
10. ISSUE-50 (URNsAndRegistries-50): Persistent references
    • Goals:
      • Determine next steps for this line of work
    • Background:
      • Jonathan requests opportunity for F2F discussion and lists potential discussion topics
      • Suggested readings from Jonathan Rees:
        • geo: URI scheme
          http://geouri.org/about/
          http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870
        • ORCID
          http://www.orcid.org/
        • Datacite
          http://www.datacite.org/whatdowedo
        • DOI Foundation
          http://www.doi.org/handbook_2000/governance.html
        • duri:
          http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-08
          
        • WebCite
          http://webcitation.org/
        • P2P DNS
          http://p2pdns.baywords.com/2010/11/30/hello-world/#comments
          
        • Namecoin
          https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/master/FAQ.md
        • W3C URI persistence policy
          http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence.html
        • Vocabulary Hosting: A Modest Proposal
          http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/papers
        • Nicholas et al., A Policy Checklist for Enabling Persistence of Identifiers, D-Lib 2009
          http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january09/nicholas/01nicholas.html
        • Masinter, A system for long-term document preservation, IS&T Archiving 2006
          http://larry.masinter.net/0603-archiving.pdf
      • ACTION-477: on - Henry Thompson - Organize meeting on persistence of domains - Due: 2011-05-16 - OPEN
      • ACTION-478: on - Jonathan Rees - Prepare a second draft of a finding on persistence of references, to be based on decision tree from Oct. 2010 F2F - Due: 2011-05-23 - OPEN
      • Closed actions and previous discussion:
        • Discussion at Feb. 2011 F2F
        • ACTION-444: on - Jonathan Rees - Draft a white paper on link persistence - Due: 2010-10-11 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-414: on - Henry S. Thompson - Prepare a draft agenda, including goals and means, for a proposed afternoon session with invited guests, and circulate for discussion prior to a decision, on the subject of addressing the persistence of domain names - Due: 2010-06-01 - CLOSED
        • June 2010 F2F discussion of domain name persistence; October 2010 F2F discussion of domain name persistence
11. ISSUE-25 (deepLinking-25): Can publication of hyperlinks cause copyright infringment?
    • Goals:
      • Discuss latest version of Publishing and linking on the Web: Draft TAG Finding 28 May 2011
      • Decide next steps regarding TAG work on copyright and deep linking
    • Background:
      • Publishing and linking on the Web: Draft TAG Finding 28 May 2011 (required reading)
      • ACTION-541: on - Jeni Tennison - Helped by DKA to produce a first draft of terminology about (deep-)linking etc. - Due: 2011-05-24 - OPEN
      • Discussion on 28 April 2011, 17 March 2011, 31 March 2011, and 14 April 2011 of "Copyright and Deep Linking"
      • Tim Berners-Lee alerts the TAG to US legal case in which a Mr. Brian McCarthy has been accused of copyright infringement resulting from his (alleged) publication of links to copyrighted material. (See also long ensuing email thread.) (Criminal complaint)
      • Suggestion to write a technical document on linking and copying (Jonathan)
      • Discussion with Thinh Nguyen at 3 Dec 2010 TAG telcon
      • ACTION-505: on - Daniel Appelquist - Start a document wrt issue-25 - Due: 2011-03-01 - CLOSED
12. HTML5 Review: HTML5 Last Call
    • Goals:
      • Establish TAG plan for responding to HTML5 Last Call (is there a better link for the last call?)
    • Background:
      • Note from Noah to HTML WG chairs questioning non-normative status of the HTML5 Edition for Web Authors
      • The HTML working group has issued a press release inviting comments from the public.
      • The last call period runs through 3 August 2011
      • On 12 May 2011, Henry Thompson and Dan Appelquist agreed to review selected items, but we probably need more coverage from other TAG members if possible.
      • Note that Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents is part of the Last Call, and is pertinent to the HTML / XML Unification agenda item.
      • public-iri mailing list discussion of IRI handling and RFC 3987 in HTML5 (heads up email from Noah)
13. ISSUE-67 (HTML-XML-Divergence-67): HTML / XML Unification
    • Norm Walsh may join us for this session, probably by phone.
    • Goals:
      • Review HTML/XML Task Force Report - 22 March 2011 Editor's Draft (required reading)
      • Decide whether further effort is required by the TAG regarding HTML / XML Unification at this time — consider closing ACTION-437
    • Background:
      • ACTION-437: on - Tim Berners-Lee - Create a task force on XML / HTML convergence - Due: 2011-06-01 - OPEN
      • Norm Walsh is chairing a group under the TAG's auspices (mailing list)
      • See also:
        • Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents (part of HTML5 Last Call)
        • Note from T.V. Raman (3 May 2010)
        • ACTION-433: on - Tim Berners-Lee - Help Tim get in touch with staff etc. re XML/HTML unification - Due: 2010-05-28 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-427: on - John Kemp - Read 4 distributed extensibility proposals and summarize them w.r.t. proposals TAG has discussed to date - Due: 2010-11-01 - CLOSED
        • Discussion on 7 June 2010 F2F: "TAG recommends the formation of a task force to drive the reunification of XML and HTML"
        • September/October 2010 HMTL WG poll on distributed extensibility
        • TAG endorses "like SVG" extension mechanism for HTML5
14. ACTION-545: Privacy
    • Note: Ashok Malhotra has agreed to lead this session
    • Goals:
      • Review the Report of the W3C Workshop on Web Tracking and User Privacy (required reading)
      • We will focus primarily, but not exclusively on "Do Not Track" proposals
      • Decide how the TAG will engage in privacy-related work for the remainder of 2011
    • Background:
      • Report of the W3C Workshop on Web Tracking and User Privacy (required reading)
      • ACTION-460: on - Daniel Appelquist - Coordinate with IAB regarding next steps on privacy policy - Due: 2011-05-24 - OPEN
      • ACTION-550: on - Daniel Appelquist - With help from Noah to plan TAG work on privacy, leading to session at F2F, next step is contact with TLR - Due: 2011-05-12 - OPEN
      • ACTION-507: on - Daniel Appelquist - With Noah to suggest next steps for TAG on privacy - Due: 2011-05-03 - CLOSED
      • ACTION-545: on - Ashok Malhotra - Report to TAG, after privacy workshop, regarding architecture issue on privacy and especially degree to which use cases beyond those addressed by "Do Not Track" need attention - Due: 2011-05-03 - CLOSED
      • Earlier background:
        • IETF/W3C Privacy workshop was held at MIT 8-98 December 2011. "Action Items" for W3C were proposed. See: Action items (PDF - may need rotating) collected at IETF/W3C Privacy Workshop wrapup
        • ACTION-264: on - Ashok Malhotra - Draft agenda item for upcoming telcon discussion of geolocation and privacy - Due: 2009-08-04 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-290: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Write to Geolocation WG saying "we have concern that the spec does not say enough user privacy" - Due: 2009-07-30 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-408: on - Daniel Appelquist - Look into next steps on a workshop around device APIs, privacy etc. with tlr - Due: 2010-03-31 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-506: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Noah to bring proposed W3C Actions on Privacy before the TAG - TLR to report back to IETF - Due: 2011-01-11 - CLOSED
        • Papers from earlier IETF/W3C workshop on privacy were at http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy/Privacy_Workshop_Papers.zip but that link appears not to work any more (ACTION-490: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Noah and others(?) going to privacy workshop to report back to the TAG? - Due: 2010-12-21 - CLOSED) (ACTION-506: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Noah to bring proposed W3C Actions on Privacy before the TAG - TLR to report back to IETF - Due: 2011-01-11 - CLOSED)
15. Web Applications: Security
    • Goals:
      • This will be a brief, and mostly non-technical(!) discussion of how the TAG can engage on security issues now that John Kemp is no longer a memeber
    • Background:
      • ACTION-515: on - Larry Masinter - (as trackbot proxy for John) who will publish http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/02/security-web.html, slightly cleaned up, with help from Noah and Larry - Due: 2011-04-12 - OPEN
      • ACTION-344: on - Jonathan Rees - Alert TAG chair when CORS and/or UMP goes to LC to trigger security review - Due: 2011-05-23 - OPEN
      • ACTION-516: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Talk with Thomas Roessler about organizing W3C architecture work on security - Due: 2011-05-17 - PENDING REVIEW
      • ACTION-341: on - Yves Lafon - Follow up with Thomas about security review activities for HTML5 - Due: 2011-05-10 - OPEN
      • ACTION-554: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Formulate product page for TAG work on security including John Kemp security draft Due: 2011-05-24 - Due: 2011-05-31 - OPEN
      • ACTION-417: on - John Kemp - Frame section 7, security - Due: 2011-01-25 - CLOSED
      • See also:
        • ACTION-33: on - Henry S. Thompson - revise naming challenges story in response to Dec 2008 F2F discussion - Due: 2011-06-06 - OPEN
        • ACTION-280: on - Dan Connolly - (with John K) to enumerate some CSRF scenarios discussed in Jun in Cambridge - Due: 2010-10-11 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-340: on - John Kemp - summarize recent discussion around XHR and UMP - Due: 2010-06-04 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-412: on - Dan Connolly - Try the clarification question, blog item, or wiki approach to metadata-in-uris vs CSRF - Due: 2010-06-07 - CLOSED
        • ACTION-435: on - Jonathan Rees - Consult Tyler Close regarding UMP-informed web storage vulnerability analysis - Due: 2010-06-22 - CLOSED
        • CORS, UMP and XHR by John Kemp (required reading for previous F2F)
        • John Kemp's note framing a security section for the architecture of Web Applications
16. RFC 3023bis and IRI
    • Goals:
      • Discuss coordination of technical issues relating to emerging drafts for RFC 3023bis and IRI
      • Decide whether TAG should be actively involved in resolving any of these issues
    • Background:
      • Henry provides details of issues to be considered. The following is adapted from Henry's note:
        • RFC 3023bis and fragment identifiers -- We discussed this a year ago (minutes) and came to a conclusion, which Noah took to ACTION-441 to convey to the 3023 editors. There was substantial pushback. Jonathan reported on our further discussion to the 3023 editors, setting out a number of alternative ways forward. Chris Lilley replied stating a preference for option 2. But nothing has happened. . . Time to put a TAG push behind a new draft of 3023bis?
        • 3023bis and Processor Profiles -- The XML Processing Model WG has produced a Last Call WD for XML Processing Profiles. Would 3023bis be the architecturally correct place to connect this to XML itself?
        • IRIbis and HTML5 'URIs' -- The HTML WG has removed all reference to 3987bis, but the IRI WG is exploring ways to get back in (the following is quoted from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2011May/0026.html):

                "In March 2011, the W3C's HTML WG made a decision to close
                 ISSUE-56 when the parties involved could not come to agreement
                 on aligning HTML5 with the IRI WG's revisions to RFC 3987:
          
                "http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0404.html
          
                "That decision effectively removed the HTML5 specification's
                 dependency on rfc3987bis.  It appears that this was done so
                 that the HTML5 specification could define how to translate
                 input strings contained in text/html documents into URIs.
          
                 . . .
          
                "However, our understanding is that ISSUE-56 can be reopened if
                 new information emerges, such as "IETF completing production of
                 a document suitable as a formal reference".  And of course as
                 chairs of the IRI WG we would like to deliver such a document."
          

      • Paul Grosso notes: Also related to IRIbis is the XML Core desire to be able to reference it normatively from the XML and related specs for the definition of LEIRIs as recorded at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0022 among other places.
17. Administration:
    • Welcome Jeni
    • TAG Summer Schedule
    • Future TAG F2F meetings
      • UK: Sept. 2011
        • Confirm 13-15 Sept 2011 in the UK as previously agreed?
        • London or Edinburgh: we've had specific requests for both
      • Early heads up: TPAC in Santa Clara, 31 Oct. - 4 Nov. 2011
      • Plan a late fall/early-winter meeting? In the US?
    • Group photo (we have new membership)
18. Action item review:
    • Pending review actions in Tracker
    • Overdue actions in Tracker
    • Open actions in Tracker