Social Web Working Group Teleconference
09 Feb 2016
See also: IRC log
- aaronpk, wilkie, tantek, bengo, ben_thatmustbeme, akuckartz, Arnaud, dromasca, AnnB, tsyesika, eprodrom, sandro
tantek: lets get started
... we have two sets of minutes to approve
tantek: the first set from Jan 26th, look a bit odd
... has anyone had a chance to review these minutes?
... (hearing nothing) well thats not a good sign
tantek: the other set of minutes is from last week
tantek: which look a bit better
eprodrom: I am the one who did the conversion on 1/26 mintues, so if you want to hold off on those I will fix them
... I basically took the IRC log and ran it through pandoc
tantek: we'll postpone that one until last week
tantek: votes for minutes from last week?
tantek: I wasn't here last week but I don't see any resolutions
<wilkie> eprodrom: you can use http://pandoc.amy.gy/ and update the url it generated to 01/26 to get something reasonable
RESOLUTION: accept minutes from last week
Activity Streams 2.0
<eprodrom> jasnell: ?
UNKNOWN_SPEAKER: first item is update on issues
eprodrom: is james on the call?
<jasnell> my regrets.. buried to my eyeballs. I will have an updated WD by the end of the week
<jasnell> eprodrom: I will open a PR to add those test files to your suite
eprodrom: i don't have a lot of updates on issues, we have been holding off on any
<bengo> jasnell: https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents/pull/1
eprodrom: I don't think there have been many new issues so I don't have any update there
tantek: is amy on the call?
sandro: in a minute
tantek: the rest of the CR issues seem to be covered by specific things in the agenda
eprodrom: I'll discuss them then
tantek: next item then
<Loqi> Dmitriz made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-03-16 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97470&oldid=97407
<Loqi> Tantekelik made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-02-02-minutes https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97472&oldid=97406
<Loqi> Eprodrom made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-01-26-minutes https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97473&oldid=97468
eprodrom: 2 weeks ago we decided that for our test suite we would provide 2 test objects, a collection of AS documents that people can use to test their parsers
... that process started last week (github link in room)
eprodrom: started with examples from core and vocab docs. James has a collection of 50 other docs that he will be merging in
... this will be our test corpus
<eprodrom> cwebber2: ?
eprodrom: i wanted to ask other people who are doing implmentations if they have tried that corpus yet?
<cwebber2> eprodrom: what's the question for me?
eprodrom: chris, it would be good to see if that works with the python implementation
<cwebber2> (sorry, my phone is busted, and I forgot to book a conference room)
<cwebber2> I'll try to investigate this weekend
eprodrom: the second part of the test suite is producing valid documents so we decided to make an online validator
<cwebber2> report back next meeting?
eprodrom: there is another github project for this
eprodrom: that is a website that will accept AS documents a number of different ways... a live working version at as2.rocks/
... would like to get it to a point of having an endpoint to be allow for scripted testing of it
... both of these projects are moving along pretty nicely
eprodrom: would be very helpful to start getting some contributions on these
<wilkie> yeah, I've looked at the code a little bit. haven't managed to get a local server up with 'npm start' yet. it errors about 'const' heh
<wilkie> I'll figure it out :)
<Loqi> eprodrom has 31 karma
eprodrom: Its Okay validation, its a pretty straight forward system, it could be a lot better on parse errors. suggestions to correct, line numbers, etc
... any questions about whats going on?
<eprodrom> wilkie: cool!
tantek: do all the test documents pass the validator?
eprodrom: I haven't tried that yet. I have only done some thus far
tantek: that might be a good milestone to denote
... do we have any error documents in the corpus?
eprodrom: I think we have a couple of "don't do it this way" documents, but not any error documents
tantek: it would be useful for thst to test non-conforming input
... anyone else with questions?
... no one?
... one more question, are you interested in additional submisisons to the corpus like from other implementations?
tantek: lets say that we are putting out an official call for anyone with AS2 producers to submit additional documents to the corpus
<Loqi> Dmitriz made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-06-07 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97476&oldid=97385
eprodrom: pull requests easiest way to do this
tantek: lets move on
... conformance section update
eprodrom: i started working on a draft for this and i still need to work with james but hopefully we will get it out in the WD that will go out this week
tantek: do you want WG review?
... before it publishes in WD, or after the fact?
eprodrom: probably better to do review of the whole doc after WD published
Tracker Actions and issues
tantek: there is nothing pending review
<eprodrom> wilkie: you need to be running the latest stable version of NodeJS
tantek: reminder to everyone that we have a F2F coming up at MIT
<wilkie> eprodrom: dang. ok. that was my suspicion. I quickly gave up and was just looking through the code. will update soon.
<wilkie> eprodrom: thanks
tantek: we have 10 people RSVP'd so far, If you are in that Zakim list, but not in participation on the wiki, please add RSVP as going, or possible, or regrets
<AnnB> I'm attending .. but having probs logging into wiki, hence cannot edit
also the in an IWC the two days before
and that link
<eprodrom> wilkie: you can also run it on Docker
... there is a link up for the F2F after that
<aaronpk> (sorry can't talk right now)
<AnnB> yay for Portland! (note some bad dates .. likely paste error)
tantek: much fewer RSVPS, the sooner we have counts, the sooner the host can reserve meeting rooms and such
<aaronpk> oops sorry about messing up the dates
tantek: thats a good time of year to be in portland
<AnnB> no worries
<wilkie> eprodrom: yeah, maybe I'll try that
tantek: there is an indiewebcamp summit before that F2F as well
Any Other Business
tantek: any other business?
<cwebber2> I shoudl be able to make it
tantek: shevski are you on the call?
shevski: thoughtworks has some questions about things they weren't entirely clear about on as2
... i will get them to write that up
... and maybe we can have them on next week
<Loqi> I added a countdown for 2/15 10:27am (#5796)
tantek: what would be really helpful for specific issues would be to use github tracker
shevski: they also have a lot of time so they might be able to contribute as well
tantek: eprodrom did you want to address that
eprodrom: yeah, any help with the test suite would be great
<bengo> Have them say hi on the list and talk about their use case?
tantek: i want to specifically emphasize that the sooner they bring up those issues on github, the better
... i think we have reached the end of the agenda
tantek: unless anyone has any other issues they want to bring up.....
... lets call it there then
<cwebber2> there's nothing to raise in activitypub land; we worked on issues a bit this week but nothing to report that's interesting enough :)
tantek: talk to you next week
<AnnB> thanks Tantek
<Loqi> Tsyesika made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-03-16 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97477&oldid=97470
<Loqi> Eprodrom made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-06-07 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97478&oldid=97476
<Loqi> Tantekelik made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-06-07 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97479&oldid=97478
<Loqi> Cwebber2 made 1 edit to Socialwg/2016-06-07 https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97480&oldid=97479
<wilkie> thanks all
<AnnB> yay Ben
<Loqi> ben_thatmustbeme has 133 karma
<tantek> ben_thatmustbeme++ for minuting!
<Loqi> ben_thatmustbeme has 134 karma
<Loqi> ben_thatmustbeme has 135 karma
<Loqi> ben_thatmustbeme has 136 karma
trackbot: end meeting
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]