18:02:05 RRSAgent has joined #social 18:02:05 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/09-social-irc 18:02:07 RRSAgent, make logs public 18:02:07 Zakim has joined #social 18:02:09 Zakim, this will be SOCL 18:02:09 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 18:02:10 present+ 18:02:10 Meeting: Social Web Working Group Teleconference 18:02:10 Date: 09 February 2016 18:02:14 present+ 18:02:16 present+ 18:02:16 present+ 18:02:22 presen+ 18:02:25 + 18:02:26 present+ 18:02:35 present+ 18:02:36 present+ 18:02:36 present+ 18:02:57 i can minute 18:03:05 scribenick: ben_thatmustbeme 18:03:15 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-02-09 18:03:20 tantek: lets get started 18:03:31 ... we have two sets of minutes to approve 18:03:39 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-01-26-minutes 18:03:54 present+ 18:03:55 ... the first set from Jan 26th, look a bit odd 18:04:04 ... has anyone had a chance to review these minutes? 18:04:12 present+ 18:04:25 ... (hearing nothing) well thats not a good sign 18:04:26 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-02-02-minutes 18:04:37 ... the other set of minutes is from last week 18:04:37 present+ eprodrom 18:04:53 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-02-02-minutes 18:04:57 ... which look a bit better 18:05:26 present+ 18:05:40 eprodrom: I am the one who did the conversion on 1/26 mintues, so if you want to hold off on those I will fix them 18:05:54 eprodrom: I basically took the IRC log and ran it through pandoc 18:05:56 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-02-02-minutes 18:06:07 tantek: we'll postpone that one until last week 18:06:44 +1 18:06:45 +1 18:06:46 +1 18:06:47 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-02-02-minutes 18:06:48 +1 18:06:52 +1 18:06:59 +1 18:07:02 tantek: votes for minutes from last week? 18:07:05 +1 18:07:18 +1 18:07:20 tantek: I wasn't here last week but I don't see any resolutions 18:07:21 eprodrom: you can use http://pandoc.amy.gy/ and update the url it generated to 01/26 to get something reasonable 18:07:32 RESOLVED: accept minutes from last week 18:07:42 TOPIC: Activity Streams 2.0 18:07:45 https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues 18:07:52 jasnell: ? 18:07:58 ... first item is update on issues 18:08:13 Zakim, who is here? 18:08:13 Present: aaronpk, wilkie, tantek, bengo, ben_thatmustbeme, akuckartz, Arnaud, dromasca, AnnB, tsyesika, eprodrom, sandro 18:08:15 On IRC I see RRSAgent, akuckartz, dromasca, AnnB, bengo, dmitriz, eprodrom, tantek, prtksxna, shevski, jasnell, shepazu, bblfish, rhiaro, kevinmarks2, tessierashpool_, ElijahLynn, 18:08:15 ... KevinMarks, Arnaud, wseltzer, rrika, elf-pavlik, wilkie, cwebber2, trackbot, nickstenn_, Loqi, jet, ben_thatmustbeme, dwhly, bret, bitbear, tsyesika, oshepherd, bigbluehat, 18:08:15 ... aaronpk, raucao, sandro 18:08:15 eprodrom: is james on the call? 18:08:16 my regrets.. buried to my eyeballs. I will have an updated WD by the end of the week 18:08:32 eprodrom: I will open a PR to add those test files to your suite 18:08:47 eprodrom: i don't have a lot of updates on issues, we have been holding off on any 18:08:57 jasnell: https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents/pull/1 18:09:16 ... I don't think there have been many new issues so I don't have any update there 18:09:23 tantek: is amy on the call? 18:09:30 sandro: in a minute 18:09:44 tantek: the rest of the CR issues seem to be covered by specific things in the agenda 18:09:54 eprodrom: I'll discuss them then 18:10:00 tantek: next item then 18:10:02 Dmitriz made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-03-16]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97470&oldid=97407 18:10:03 Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-02-02-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97472&oldid=97406 18:10:04 Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-01-26-minutes]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97473&oldid=97468 18:10:34 eprodrom: 2 weeks ago we decided that for our test suite we would provide 2 test objects, a collection of AS documents that people can use to test their parsers 18:10:58 ... that process started last week (github link in room) 18:11:21 https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents 18:11:59 ... started with examples from core and vocab docs. James has a collection of 50 other docs that he will be merging in 18:12:14 ... this will be our test corpus 18:12:31 cwebber2: ? 18:12:39 ... i wanted to ask other people who are doing implmentations if they have tried that corpus yet? 18:12:47 eprodrom: what's the question for me? 18:13:07 ... chris, it would be good to see if that works with the python implementation 18:13:11 (sorry, my phone is busted, and I forgot to book a conference room) 18:13:12 ah 18:13:24 I'll try to investigate this weekend 18:13:40 ... the second part of the test suite is producing valid documents so we decided to make an online validator 18:13:43 report back next meeting? 18:13:52 https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-validator 18:13:56 ... there is another github project for this 18:14:17 https://as2.rocks/ 18:14:30 ... that is a website that will accept AS documents a number of different ways... a live working version at as2.rocks/ 18:15:03 ... would like to get it to a point of having an endpoint to be allow for scripted testing of it 18:15:14 ... both of these projects are moving along pretty nicely 18:15:23 Cool https://as2.rocks/validate?url=https%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c-social%2Factivitystreams-test-documents%2Fmaster%2Fvocabulary-ex152-jsonld.json 18:15:26 ... would be very helpful to start getting some contributions on these 18:15:28 yeah, I've looked at the code a little bit. haven't managed to get a local server up with 'npm start' yet. it errors about 'const' heh 18:15:37 I'll figure it out :) 18:16:05 eprodrom++ 18:16:07 eprodrom has 31 karma 18:16:24 ... Its Okay validation, its a pretty straight forward system, it could be a lot better on parse errors. suggestions to correct, line numbers, etc 18:16:32 ... any questions about whats going on? 18:16:34 wilkie: cool! 18:16:47 tantek: do all the test documents pass the validator? 18:17:03 eprodrom: I haven't tried that yet. I have only done some thus far 18:17:15 tantek: that might be a good milestone to denote 18:17:25 ... do we have any error documents in the corpus? 18:17:47 eprodrom: I think we have a couple of "don't do it this way" documents, but not any error documents 18:18:02 https://github.com/w3c-social/activitystreams-test-documents/issues/2 18:18:02 tantek: it would be useful for thst to test non-conforming input 18:18:14 q? 18:18:34 tantek: anyone else with questions? 18:18:54 ... no one? 18:19:22 tantek: one more question, are you interested in additional submisisons to the corpus like from other implementations? 18:19:27 eprodrom: DEFINITELY 18:19:56 tantek: lets say that we are putting out an official call for anyone with AS2 producers to submit additional documents to the corpus 18:20:02 Dmitriz made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97476&oldid=97385 18:20:07 q? 18:20:08 eprodrom: pull requests easiest way to do this 18:20:18 tantek: lets move on 18:20:29 ... conformance section update 18:20:35 https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/281 18:21:10 eprodrom: i started working on a draft for this and i still need to work with james but hopefully we will get it out in the WD that will go out this week 18:21:18 tantek: do you want WG review? 18:21:49 ... before it publishes in WD, or after the fact? 18:22:09 eprodrom: probably better to do review of the whole doc after WD published 18:22:21 TOPIC: tracker actions and issues 18:22:41 tantek: there is nothing pending review 18:22:51 wilkie: you need to be running the latest stable version of NodeJS 18:22:54 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-03-16 18:22:59 ... reminder to everyone that we have a F2F coming up at MIT 18:23:06 zakim, who is here? 18:23:06 Present: aaronpk, wilkie, tantek, bengo, ben_thatmustbeme, akuckartz, Arnaud, dromasca, AnnB, tsyesika, eprodrom, sandro 18:23:08 On IRC I see RRSAgent, akuckartz, dromasca, AnnB, bengo, dmitriz, eprodrom, tantek, prtksxna, shevski, jasnell, shepazu, bblfish, rhiaro, kevinmarks2, tessierashpool_, ElijahLynn, 18:23:08 ... KevinMarks, Arnaud, wseltzer, rrika, elf-pavlik, wilkie, cwebber2, trackbot, nickstenn_, Loqi, jet, ben_thatmustbeme, dwhly, bret, bitbear, tsyesika, oshepherd, bigbluehat, 18:23:08 ... aaronpk, raucao, sandro 18:23:20 eprodrom: dang. ok. that was my suspicion. I quickly gave up and was just looking through the code. will update soon. 18:23:25 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-03-16#Participation 18:23:39 oh 18:23:41 eprodrom: thanks 18:23:45 ... we have 10 people RSVP'd so far, If you are in that Zakim list, but not in participation on the wiki, please add RSVP as going, or possible, or regrets 18:23:45 I'm attending .. but having probs logging into wiki, hence cannot edit 18:23:57 also the in an IWC the two days before 18:23:59 https://indiewebcamp.com/2016/MIT/Guest_List 18:24:06 and that link 18:24:07 wilkie: you can also run it on Docker 18:24:22 https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2016-06-07 18:24:37 ... there is a link up for the F2F after that 18:24:56 (sorry can't talk right now) 18:25:03 yay for Portland! (note some bad dates .. likely paste error) 18:25:04 ... much fewer RSVPS, the sooner we have counts, the sooner the host can reserve meeting rooms and such 18:25:19 oops sorry about messing up the dates 18:25:22 ... thats a good time of year to be in portland 18:25:24 no worries 18:25:28 https://indiewebcamp.com/2016/Guest_List 18:25:33 eprodrom: yeah, maybe I'll try that 18:25:35 there is an indiewebcamp summit before that F2F as well 18:25:42 q> 18:25:43 q? 18:25:57 .... any other business? 18:26:15 I shoudl be able to make it 18:26:19 tantek: shevski are you on the call? 18:26:43 shevski: thoughtworks has some questions about things they weren't entirely clear about on as2 18:26:55 ... i will get them to write that up 18:27:12 ... and maybe we can have them on next week 18:27:13 I added a countdown for 2/15 10:27am (#5796) 18:27:15 https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues 18:27:30 tantek: what would be really helpful for specific issues would be to use github tracker 18:27:59 shevski: they also have a lot of time so they might be able to contribute as well 18:28:10 tantek: eprodrom did you want to address that 18:28:21 eprodrom: yeah, any help with the test suite would be great 18:28:28 Have them say hi on the list and talk about their use case? 18:28:49 tantek: i want to specifically emphasize that the sooner they bring up those issues on github, the better 18:28:56 q? 18:29:17 ... i think we have reached the end of the agenda 18:29:21 Great! 18:29:29 ... unless anyone has any other issues they want to bring up..... 18:29:52 ... lets call it there then 18:29:53 there's nothing to raise in activitypub land; we worked on issues a bit this week but nothing to report that's interesting enough :) 18:29:59 ... talk to you next week 18:30:00 thanks Tantek 18:30:02 Tsyesika made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-03-16]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97477&oldid=97470 18:30:03 Eprodrom made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97478&oldid=97476 18:30:04 Tantekelik made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97479&oldid=97478 18:30:05 Cwebber2 made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-06-07]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=97480&oldid=97479 18:30:07 thanks all 18:30:07 lata! 18:30:07 yay Ben 18:30:11 ben_thatmustbeme++ 18:30:13 ben_thatmustbeme has 133 karma 18:30:13 ben_thatmustbeme++ for minuting! 18:30:15 ben_thatmustbeme has 134 karma 18:30:16 ben_thatmustbeme++ 18:30:19 ben_thatmustbeme has 135 karma 18:30:31 ben_thatmustbeme++ 18:30:34 ben_thatmustbeme has 136 karma 18:30:45 trackbot: end meeting 18:30:45 Zakim, list attendees 18:30:45 As of this point the attendees have been aaronpk, wilkie, tantek, bengo, ben_thatmustbeme, akuckartz, Arnaud, dromasca, AnnB, tsyesika, eprodrom, sandro 18:30:53 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:30:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/09-social-minutes.html trackbot 18:30:54 RRSAgent, bye 18:30:54 I see no action items