ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa?
Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- css-counter-styles
- Raised by:
- Richard Ishida
- Opened on:
- 2014-02-14
- Description:
- 6.2 Alphabetic: lower-alpha, lower-latin, upper-alpha, upper-latin, lower-greek, hiragana, hiragana-iroha, katakana, katakana-iroha
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#simple-alphabetic
The hiragana, katakana, hiragana-iroha, and katakana-iroha seem to be implemented in the same way in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and now Opera. The implementation differs from the spec only by the addition of one or two characters to the basic set.
Should we change the spec to align with the implementations?
For more information see the test results at
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/css3-counter-styles/predefined-styles/results-cstyles#simplealpha - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2014-02-21)
- Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? (from ishida@w3.org on 2014-02-15)
- Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? (from quanxunzhen@gmail.com on 2014-02-15)
- Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2014-02-14)
- [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? (from ishida@w3.org on 2014-02-14)
- I18N-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? [css3-counter-styles] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-02-14)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log