W3C

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 18 February 2022

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2022-02-17 to 2022-02-22.

14 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Review of Teleconference Minutes
  2. Review of the EOWG Work for this week
  3. Is Content Author the right name for the next set of curriculum modules?
  4. Other Information to Share
  5. EOWG Teleconference Availability
  6. EOWG 2022 Face to Face Availability

1. Review of Teleconference Minutes

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read or skim this week's teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes (and/or resolution(s)) passed. Find the summary and a link to the full minutes on the 2022 Minutes wiki page.

If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes 11
I was in the meeting and suggest a change to the minutes in the comments below.
I missed the meeting, have reviewed the minutes, and understand tasks and next steps for EOWG participants. 1
I missed the meeting and have questions about the minutes, explained below. 1
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Review of Teleconference MinutesComments
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Denis Boudreau
  • I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
unlikely, due to other priorities. I defer to the EO team.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Estella Oncins
  • I missed the meeting, have reviewed the minutes, and understand tasks and next steps for EOWG participants.
  • I missed the meeting and have questions about the minutes, explained below.
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Minutes look fine.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Kevin White
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Should there be an option: 'I was in the teleconference and have reviewed the minutes'?
Carlos Duarte
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Michele Williams
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Letícia Seixas Pereira
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Jade Matos Carew
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
Brian Elton
  • I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
Will review on Feb 23
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference - did not review minutes
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Brent Bakken
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kevin White
  • Carlos Duarte
  • Laura Keen
  • Michele Williams
  • Letícia Seixas Pereira
  • Jade Matos Carew
  • Sylvie Duchateau
I was in the meeting and suggest a change to the minutes in the comments below.
I missed the meeting, have reviewed the minutes, and understand tasks and next steps for EOWG participants.
  • Estella Oncins
I missed the meeting and have questions about the minutes, explained below.
  • Estella Oncins
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
  • Denis Boudreau
  • Brian Elton

2. Review of the EOWG Work for this week

summary | by responder | by choice

Please indicate below that you have seen and understand the assigned Work for This Week.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week . 13
I reviewed work for this week and have questions below.
I don't have time this week for the assigned work and will catch up by the date entered below. 1

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Review of the EOWG Work for this weekComments
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Denis Boudreau
  • I don't have time this week for the assigned work and will catch up by the date entered below.
My focus is on ARRM, so will not takeon any of the work identified for this week.
Brent Bakken
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Estella Oncins
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Howard Kramer
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Kevin White
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Carlos Duarte
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Laura Keen
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Michele Williams
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Letícia Seixas Pereira
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Jade Matos Carew
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Brian Elton
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I'm have reviewed and understand the assigned work for EOWG this week .
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Brent Bakken
  • Estella Oncins
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kevin White
  • Carlos Duarte
  • Laura Keen
  • Michele Williams
  • Letícia Seixas Pereira
  • Jade Matos Carew
  • Brian Elton
  • Sylvie Duchateau
I reviewed work for this week and have questions below.
I don't have time this week for the assigned work and will catch up by the date entered below.
  • Denis Boudreau

3. Is Content Author the right name for the next set of curriculum modules?

summary | by responder | by choice

Discussion in the meeting of 18 February about naming the next set of curriculum modules has tentatively settled on calling them the Content Author Modules. This curriculum will follow the published series that includes:

Please indicate below if you think this is the right name to use or if we should keep working to find another name.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, this seems like the right choice. 11
No, I don't think this is quite right but I have no suggestion at this time.
I have a different idea and have put my suggestion in GitHub or the comment box below 1
I have no opinion and leave the decision to the discretion of the Task Force. 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Is Content Author the right name for the next set of curriculum modules?Comments
Kris Anne Kinney
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Denis Boudreau
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
This is what we're using in the ARRM project, so I see value in aligning our labels as much as we possibly can.
Brent Bakken
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Even though this is not following the one word precedent we have set with the other, I think "Content Author Modules" is very clear and specific. I like it.
Estella Oncins
  • I have a different idea and have put my suggestion in GitHub or the comment box below
I have reviewed the minutes and to me "Content Author" is the right choice but it might not be well understood by the curricula potential audience, and in some instances it has been addressed from a developers/designers perspective. This might be my perception as I was not in the meeting. I have also commented in GitHub.
Howard Kramer
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Kevin White
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Carlos Duarte
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Laura Keen
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Michele Williams
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Letícia Seixas Pereira
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Jade Matos Carew
  • Yes, this seems like the right choice.
Brian Elton
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I have no opinion and leave the decision to the discretion of the Task Force.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Yes, this seems like the right choice.
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Denis Boudreau
  • Brent Bakken
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kevin White
  • Carlos Duarte
  • Laura Keen
  • Michele Williams
  • Letícia Seixas Pereira
  • Jade Matos Carew
No, I don't think this is quite right but I have no suggestion at this time.
I have a different idea and have put my suggestion in GitHub or the comment box below
  • Estella Oncins
I have no opinion and leave the decision to the discretion of the Task Force.
  • Sylvie Duchateau

4. Other Information to Share

Feel free to put here things such as:

  • What you worked on for EOWG this week.
  • What you would like EOWG folks to know.
  • Information or questions for EOWG planning — for upcoming teleconferences, future work planning, etc.

(Note that the results of this survey are available publicly, so what you put here can be seen by all. :)

Work for upcoming EOWG teleconferences: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)

Details

Responder Other Information to Share
Kris Anne Kinney
Denis Boudreau
Brent Bakken Nothing additional this week.
Estella Oncins
Howard Kramer Just curricula task force participation.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Kevin White Work on the HPWDUTW issues backlog is progressing. Some o the challenging ones are possibly being left until the end but we will get to them
Carlos Duarte
Laura Keen
Michele Williams
Letícia Seixas Pereira
Jade Matos Carew Joined the curricula task force to help out with the content author modules, seems like a good fit with my training background and current work at the OU with internal guidance.
I also need to get a round up to you of 2 pieces of work we have at the OU based on EOWG resources. One is using the developer modules as the basis for our first round of in house training for 100 developers. The second is a set of flow charts which covers compliance and considerations for video and audio accessibility which we've published for OU staff, and links out to the making AV media accessible pages.
Brian Elton
Sylvie Duchateau

5. EOWG Teleconference Availability

Have you updated your EOWG Teleconference Availability lately? (If not, please do so now. Thank you!)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 14
no

Details

Responder EOWG Teleconference Availability
Kris Anne Kinney yes
Denis Boudreau yes
Brent Bakken yes
Estella Oncins yes
Howard Kramer yes
Shadi Abou-Zahra yes
Kevin White yes
Carlos Duarte yes
Laura Keen yes
Michele Williams yes
Letícia Seixas Pereira yes
Jade Matos Carew yes
Brian Elton yes
Sylvie Duchateau yes

6. EOWG 2022 Face to Face Availability

Have you updated your Face to Face Meeting Availability lately? We understand that it is hard to plan in this environment. You can change your answers at any time. Thank you!

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 12
no 2

Details

Responder EOWG 2022 Face to Face Availability
Kris Anne Kinney yes
Denis Boudreau yes
Brent Bakken yes
Estella Oncins yes
Howard Kramer yes
Shadi Abou-Zahra no
Kevin White yes
Carlos Duarte yes
Laura Keen yes
Michele Williams yes
Letícia Seixas Pereira yes
Jade Matos Carew yes
Brian Elton yes
Sylvie Duchateau no

More details on responses

  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 18, February 2022 at 18:39 (UTC)
  • Denis Boudreau: last responded on 18, February 2022 at 19:43 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 21, February 2022 at 19:54 (UTC)
  • Estella Oncins: last responded on 21, February 2022 at 23:15 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 03:14 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 09:02 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 09:18 (UTC)
  • Carlos Duarte: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 10:50 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 11:47 (UTC)
  • Michele Williams: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 15:29 (UTC)
  • Letícia Seixas Pereira: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 16:22 (UTC)
  • Jade Matos Carew: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 20:12 (UTC)
  • Brian Elton: last responded on 22, February 2022 at 21:19 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 23, February 2022 at 00:00 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Shawn Lawton Henry
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Sharron Rush
  6. Jedi Lin
  7. David Sloan
  8. Mary Jo Mueller
  9. Vicki Menezes Miller
  10. Reinaldo Ferraz
  11. Bill Kasdorf
  12. Cristina Mussinelli
  13. Kevin White
  14. Kevin Rydberg
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Sarah Pulis
  17. Bill Tyler
  18. Gregorio Pellegrino
  19. Ruoxi Ran
  20. Jennifer Chadwick
  21. Sean Kelly
  22. Muhammad Saleem
  23. Sarah Lewthwaite
  24. Daniel Montalvo
  25. Mark Palmer
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  32. Julianna Rowsell
  33. Tabitha Mahoney
  34. Fred Edora
  35. Rabab Gomaa
  36. Marcelo Paiva
  37. Eloisa Guerrero
  38. Leonard Beasley
  39. Frankie Wolf
  40. Supriya Makude
  41. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  42. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire