W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Approval of the Updated Graphics - Eval Video 5

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org, shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2020-01-29 to 2020-01-31.

9 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. About this survey
  2. Review level
  3. Comments and approval

1. About this survey

EOWG requested significant changes to Video 5 and approved the description of the changes expected to be made to the graphic elements.

This survey asks EOWG to revisit the work in progress and approve these graphic elements that were created in response to the last survey. Please return to the wiki and review the only the graphics that have been added to the the "Visual" column of the script of Video 5. Additional background information may be found as follows:

Note: We are asking for your final approval of the the visuals only. The audio narration has already been recorded as previously approved.

Details

Responder
Sharron Rush
Kris Anne Kinney
Eric Eggert
Estella Oncins
Jennifer Chadwick
Sylvie Duchateau
Brent Bakken
Shawn Lawton Henry
Daniel Montalvo

2. Review level

summary | by responder | by choice

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it thoroughly. 4
I skimmed it. 3
I need more time, and ask for the video to be delayed into February.
I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!) 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Review levelComments
Sharron Rush
  • I skimmed it.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I skimmed it.
Eric Eggert
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Estella Oncins
  • I skimmed it.
Jennifer Chadwick
  • I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)
 Apologies for not having time to get to this during this week. I am happy with the direction of the videos and abstain and accept the decisions of the Working Group on this. Thanks.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)
Brent Bakken
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Daniel Montalvo
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I reviewed it thoroughly.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Brent Bakken
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Daniel Montalvo
I skimmed it.
  • Sharron Rush
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Estella Oncins
I need more time, and ask for the video to be delayed into February.
I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)
  • Jennifer Chadwick
  • Sylvie Duchateau

3. Comments and approval

summary | by responder | by choice

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I approve the new graphic elements as presented. 4
I support the new graphic elements; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion. 2
I support the new graphic elements only with the changes in the comments below
I do not support the new graphic elements, because of the comments below
I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group 3

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Comments and approvalComments
Sharron Rush
  • I approve the new graphic elements as presented.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
 Lately, I have been having a difficult time visualizing the videos and the changes just based on the words - I know I am of no help once the video has been produced, but its not been easy for me to "see" the descriptions in my head. I will be on the call on Friday to listen to the discussion.
Eric Eggert
  • I support the new graphic elements; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
 With the purple the many people look a little bit brown-ish as a group. Maybe that is just the small size. I also think the people in this arrow are a little to dense and it is not immediately clear that it is people: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/File:Pos_6_arrow_pawns.png But I guess it is clear from the animation.
Estella Oncins
  • I approve the new graphic elements as presented.
It is difficult to approve the new graphic elements as presented without seeing the final video. In any case I leave it to editor's discretion and I fully trust the Working Group.
Jennifer Chadwick
  • I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
 Not qualified to approve visual ;)
Brent Bakken
  • I approve the new graphic elements as presented.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I support the new graphic elements; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
 Sorry to be a bit brief, but not able to type more now. I can explain on the call as helpful

Seq 4 +1 for the new images

Seq 5 +1 to the gauge (well, I liked mine better https://www.123rf.com/photo_97931220_stock-vector-gauge-meter-icon-on-white-.html , but this one is fine ;-)

Seq 6 The people-icons are too dense to be easily recognizable in a short time.
Also, zooming in is a fair bit of potentially distracting motion.
My original idea was to have people-icons instead of an arrow (or people-icons additionally underneath an arrow) – such the rough sketch images in e-mail https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-eo-editors/2020Jan/0016.html
I’m OK with it as is, if editor and WG prefer.

Seq 7 I really like the rating stars for “higher customer satisfaction”.
a few points:
* Maybe the stars should be even bigger/stronger. Do we need the people-icons in the scene?
* I don’t understand the 2 people-icons standing out from the others.
* I think it should be 5 stars (instead of just 4)?
* Could animate the stars – first showing 5 outlines with the first two colored, then the others get colored in!

+1 to this earth/world with heart in the center (much better than complicated globe :-)
Daniel Montalvo
  • I approve the new graphic elements as presented.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I approve the new graphic elements as presented.
  • Sharron Rush
  • Estella Oncins
  • Brent Bakken
  • Daniel Montalvo
I support the new graphic elements; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I support the new graphic elements only with the changes in the comments below
I do not support the new graphic elements, because of the comments below
I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Jennifer Chadwick
  • Sylvie Duchateau

More details on responses

  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 21:13 (UTC)
  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 21:25 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 21:35 (UTC)
  • Estella Oncins: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 22:05 (UTC)
  • Jennifer Chadwick: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 22:23 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 30, January 2020 at 09:01 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 30, January 2020 at 19:44 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 31, January 2020 at 03:41 (UTC)
  • Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 31, January 2020 at 13:05 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Vicki Menezes Miller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin White
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Adina Halter
  15. Denis Boudreau
  16. Laura Keen
  17. Sarah Pulis
  18. Bill Tyler
  19. Gregorio Pellegrino
  20. Ruoxi Ran
  21. Sean Kelly
  22. Muhammad Saleem
  23. Sarah Lewthwaite
  24. Mark Palmer
  25. Jade Matos Carew
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.