W3C

Results of Questionnaire Approval of the Updated Visuals for Evaluation Video 5

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org, shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2020-01-24 to 2020-01-28.

14 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. About this survey
  2. Review level
  3. Comments and approval

1. About this survey

EOWG requested significant changes to Video 5. We have updated description of new visuals. We're hoping to approve this by Tuesday 28 January, and get the final updated video that week. (If we don't meet that schedule, we might need to wait until the end of February to finish this video.)

This survey collects responses to the EOWG approval of the Evaluation Video 5 Visuals description.

Note: We are reviewing the visuals only of the script. The audio narration has already been recorded as previously approved.

For each of your comments, please clearly indicate:

  • level:
    [ED-low] editors' discretion or
    [ED-med] editors' discretion or
    [!!] important to be addressed before publication
  • location: (such as: "minute X:YZ in the scene with ...")
  • current visual description:
  • suggested revision:
  • rationale:

Details

Responder
Daniel Montalvo
Sylvie Duchateau
Kevin White
Mark Palmer
Brent Bakken
Hidde de Vries
Eric Eggert
Helen Burge
Lewis Phillips
Laura Keen
Jennifer Chadwick
Shawn Lawton Henry
Howard Kramer Kind of hard to judge without seeing the video but it all looks fine to me. Like that globe with the heart!
Sharron Rush I abstain and accept the decision of the group

2. Review level

summary | by responder | by choice

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it thoroughly. 11
I skimmed it. 1
I need more time, and ask for the video to be delayed into February.
I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!) 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Review levelComments
Daniel Montalvo
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Sylvie Duchateau
Kevin White
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
[ED-low]: Seq 5 Time 41-47: Might be worth matching the motivation gauge to the compliance gauge in Video 4
[ED-med]: Seq 7 Time 56-65: Not sure about the globe with a heart icon. Looks a bit like a basketball. Maybe something that flips this to be a heart of a globe e.g. https://knoxvillecpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/heart_globe.png
Mark Palmer
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Brent Bakken
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Hidde de Vries
  • I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)
Eric Eggert
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Helen Burge
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
  • I skimmed it.
Lewis Phillips
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Laura Keen
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Jennifer Chadwick
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
I have reviewed all of the resources above and noted the minutes of the discussion from the last call. I am in agreement with the (+1) that were proposed - the alignment of the user types on the right, remove the sticker, keep with the website crumbling, adding testing icon. etc. No further comments.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Howard Kramer
  • I reviewed it thoroughly.
Sharron Rush
  • I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I reviewed it thoroughly.
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Kevin White
  • Mark Palmer
  • Brent Bakken
  • Eric Eggert
  • Helen Burge
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Laura Keen
  • Jennifer Chadwick
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Howard Kramer
I skimmed it.
  • Helen Burge
I need more time, and ask for the video to be delayed into February.
I didn't get to it. (Please do answer the next question, too!)
  • Hidde de Vries
  • Sharron Rush

3. Comments and approval

summary | by responder | by choice

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I support these video 5 visuals as they are 9
I support these video 5 visuals; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion. 3
I support these video 5 visuals only with the changes in the comments below
I do not support these video 5 visuals, because of the comments below
I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Comments and approvalComments
Daniel Montalvo
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
Kevin White
  • I support these video 5 visuals; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
Mark Palmer
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
Brent Bakken
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
I like sequence 6 with the people. It will be interesting to see how this turns out. It seems like there will be a lot of movement, but it seems to relate much closer to the Audio portion of the script.
Hidde de Vries
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
Eric Eggert
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
[ED-low], actually [ED-super-duper-low], more like [random-comment] In scenes 6 & 7 there’s a lot going on, at least it appears like that from reading it (but it might also be that those scenes need more description because they have changed quite a lot). I encourage the Editor to condense animation if there’s really too much going on after animating it.
Helen Burge
  • I support these video 5 visuals; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
For the people that get shown, as they are just symbols of solid color. I think it would be easier to see some if they had an outline as some backgrounds make it hard to see the yellow person.
The use of color is indicated in the 4th visuals to indicate a change. What does orange versus blue icons mean as not clear from the audio?
Lewis Phillips
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
Laura Keen
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
Jennifer Chadwick
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
I support the videos with the updated changes that were proposed. No further changes.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I support these video 5 visuals; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
Segment 5: Gauge.

[??] What would the gauge look like? A search for "gauge icon" gives circle or half-circle things. Here's one I quite like https://www.123rf.com/photo_97931220_stock-vector-gauge-meter-icon-on-white-.html And the things it brings to my mind (faster, louder) are appropriate here.

[ED-high] I would *not* want to use the plain bar like at the beginning of the conformance video, since no one likes it.
[ignore] (if we had time -- which I understand that we do not-- perhaps we would consider a gauge for there, too?)

Segment 6

"We zoom in closely so that the whole center of the circle is filled with people."

[??] Are these the same "pawn" people used throughout these other videos?

"A bit like this but with the globe just using one color instead of two, and without an outline around the heart: "

I like the world and heart concept.
[ED-med] +1 for making it visually much simpler (even more than is in the text description)
[ED-lo] Actually, I'd prefer a real world rather than a globe.
Maybe something kinda like this https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/2101772/global_globe_heart_world_icon or https://www.svgrepo.com/svg/280297/world-heart
with the world appearing first, and the heart growing from it?

---

Overall, I think this is *much* better! I'm excited for this video!

Howard Kramer
  • I support these video 5 visuals as they are
Sharron Rush
  • I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I support these video 5 visuals as they are
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Mark Palmer
  • Brent Bakken
  • Hidde de Vries
  • Eric Eggert
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Laura Keen
  • Jennifer Chadwick
  • Howard Kramer
I support these video 5 visuals; please consider the comments below for editors' discretion.
  • Kevin White
  • Helen Burge
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I support these video 5 visuals only with the changes in the comments below
I do not support these video 5 visuals, because of the comments below
I abstain (not vote) and accept the decisions of the Working Group
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Sharron Rush

More details on responses

  • Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 27, January 2020 at 08:29 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 27, January 2020 at 09:14 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 27, January 2020 at 12:07 (UTC)
  • Mark Palmer: last responded on 27, January 2020 at 13:41 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 27, January 2020 at 23:02 (UTC)
  • Hidde de Vries: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 08:22 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 10:18 (UTC)
  • Helen Burge: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 13:15 (UTC)
  • Lewis Phillips: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 13:54 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 18:15 (UTC)
  • Jennifer Chadwick: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 18:50 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 28, January 2020 at 23:29 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 05:23 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 29, January 2020 at 20:24 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Vicki Menezes Miller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin White
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Adina Halter
  15. Denis Boudreau
  16. Sarah Pulis
  17. Bill Tyler
  18. Gregorio Pellegrino
  19. Ruoxi Ran
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Jade Matos Carew
  24. Sonsoles López Pernas
  25. Greta Krafsig
  26. Jason McKee
  27. Jayne Schurick
  28. Eric M. Velleman
  29. Billie Johnston
  30. Michele Williams
  31. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  32. Michel Hansma
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Vera Lange
  35. Jasper Jeurens
  36. Julianna Rowsell
  37. Tabitha Mahoney
  38. Fred Edora
  39. Rabab Gomaa
  40. Marcelo Paiva
  41. Leonard Beasley
  42. Frankie Wolf
  43. Supriya Makude
  44. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  45. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire