W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 29 January 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-01-29 to 2016-02-04.

8 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Attended/read summary of 29 January meeting
  2. Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: New activity
  3. Naming intro
  4. What is X?
  5. "Accessible UI Components" formatting

1. Attended/read summary of 29 January meeting

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 29 January EOWG teleconference meeting minutes (or summary) or indicate that you were on the call. Summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I attended the teleconference. 7
I was not able to attend but have read the minutes and updated the wiki to indicate that fact. 1
I did not attend and have not read the minutes yet. The date for my review is in the comment box below.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Attended/read summary of 29 January meetingComments
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I attended the teleconference.
Brent Bakken
  • I attended the teleconference.
David Berman
  • I was not able to attend but have read the minutes and updated the wiki to indicate that fact.
James Green
  • I attended the teleconference.
Susan Hewitt
  • I attended the teleconference.
Kevin White
  • I attended the teleconference.
Sharron Rush
  • I attended the teleconference.
Howard Kramer
  • I attended the teleconference.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I attended the teleconference.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Kevin White
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I was not able to attend but have read the minutes and updated the wiki to indicate that fact.
  • David Berman
I did not attend and have not read the minutes yet. The date for my review is in the comment box below.

2. Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: New activity

Brent's comment on the Big Picture highlighted that there was a gap in the resource exploring what to consider when the plan was put into action.

The Assign tasks and support delivery activity has been added to the Implement section in response.

Please review the content for this activity and add any comments in GitHub as new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, please add your comments below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). 4
I will review it by the date in the comment section below. 1
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group. 3

Details

Responder Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: New activity
Shawn Lawton Henry I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group.
Brent Bakken I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below).
David Berman I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group.
James Green I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). no comments
Susan Hewitt I will review it by the date in the comment section below. Next meeting
Kevin White I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). [Document author]
Sharron Rush I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below).
Howard Kramer I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group.

3. Naming intro

We've been working on the name/title of the resource described in the requirements analysis (rough prototype).

Please at least skim relevant parts of minutes:

The next two questions relate to aspects of this name.

Details

Responder Naming intro
Shawn Lawton Henry
Brent Bakken
David Berman
James Green
Susan Hewitt
Kevin White
Sharron Rush
Howard Kramer

4. What is X?

Please consider the perspectives on the pros(+) and cons(-) of specific words in:

Some of these perspectives are very important and should impact your ratings!

The list below does not include some ruled out because they could imply that we created or host the things: Repository, Library, Bank, Collection.

Please pick a number that indicates how much you think this word fits (given all the considerations shared in the minutes), with 1 being highest, and 9 being that you object to it.

(Please ignore the next paragraph; and ignore "Rank"; and in the options, ignore "don’t mind" and "don’t want" — we're using a survey template that doesn't work well.)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Don’t mindDon’t wantRanked 1Ranked 2Ranked 3Ranked 4Ranked 5Ranked 6Ranked 7Ranked 8Ranked 9
List 2 1 2 1 1 1
Index 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Gallery 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Catalog 2 1 2 1 2
Hub 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Compendium 1 2 2 2 1
Directory 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
Toolkit 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
other - in comments 6 1 1

Details

Responder ListIndexGalleryCatalogHubCompendiumDirectory Toolkitother - in commentsComments
Shawn Lawton Henry Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Ranked 8 Ranked 2 Ranked 7 Ranked 7 Ranked 8 Ranked 7 Don’t mind
Brent Bakken Ranked 1 Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Ranked 5 Ranked 5 Ranked 7 Ranked 3 Ranked 4 Don’t mind
David Berman Ranked 1 Ranked 2 Ranked 4 Ranked 5 Ranked 3 Ranked 6 Ranked 7 Don’t want Don’t mind
James Green Ranked 7 Ranked 6 Ranked 5 Ranked 1 Ranked 9 Ranked 8 Ranked 4 Ranked 9 Ranked 9
Susan Hewitt Ranked 4 Ranked 5 Ranked 7 Ranked 1 Ranked 3 Ranked 6 Ranked 8 Ranked 2 Don’t mind
Kevin White Don’t want Don’t want Don’t want Don’t want Don’t want Don’t want Don’t want Don’t want Ranked 6 I am not sure that anything is needed for 'X'. 'Accessible UI Components' describes what the page provides. Whether it is a list of them or a catalog of them or whatever adds nothing to the core name.
Sharron Rush Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind At this point in the discussion I don't think the modifier is needed at all
Howard Kramer Don’t mind Ranked 4 Don’t mind Don’t mind Ranked 2 Don’t want Ranked 9 Ranked 1 Don’t mind

5. "Accessible UI Components" formatting

Do you like this format?:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
NoYes, but prefer notYesYes, and prefer
Accessible UI Components [X]: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks 3 1 2 2
Accessible UI Components [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks 4 2 2
Accessible UI Components: [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks 3 1 2 2
Accessible UI Components [X] 2 4 2
other - in Comments below 6 2

Ranking of choices in order of least unacceptable/most prefered:

RanksAll responders:
1Accessible UI Components [X]
2Accessible UI Components [X]: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks
3Accessible UI Components: [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks
4Accessible UI Components [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks
5other - in Comments below

Details

Responder Accessible UI Components [X]: Widgets, Templates, FrameworksAccessible UI Components [X] of Widgets, Templates, FrameworksAccessible UI Components: [X] of Widgets, Templates, FrameworksAccessible UI Components [X]other - in Comments belowComments
Shawn Lawton Henry Yes, and prefer No Yes No No
Brent Bakken Yes, and prefer Yes Yes, but prefer not No No
David Berman Yes, but prefer not Yes, but prefer not Yes, and prefer Yes, and prefer No
James Green No No No Yes No
Susan Hewitt Yes Yes, but prefer not No Yes, and prefer No
Kevin White No No No Yes No General comment that specifying that these are Widgets, Templates, and Frameworks simlpy adds a limiting filter on what people might consider finding here. Not sure what use case adding the additional stuff responds to.
Sharron Rush Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ...suggest to forget [X] and have the title be
Accessible UI Components: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks
Howard Kramer No No Yes, and prefer Yes Yes

More details on responses

  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 1, February 2016 at 02:49 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 1, February 2016 at 22:28 (UTC)
  • David Berman: last responded on 2, February 2016 at 23:20 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 3, February 2016 at 00:32 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 4, February 2016 at 02:21 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 4, February 2016 at 14:10 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 4, February 2016 at 19:14 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 5, February 2016 at 04:01 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  4. Sylvie Duchateau
  5. Kazuhito Kidachi
  6. Jedi Lin
  7. David Sloan
  8. Mary Jo Mueller
  9. Vicki Menezes Miller
  10. Reinaldo Ferraz
  11. Bill Kasdorf
  12. Cristina Mussinelli
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Denis Boudreau
  17. Laura Keen
  18. Sarah Pulis
  19. Bill Tyler
  20. Gregorio Pellegrino
  21. Ruoxi Ran
  22. Jennifer Chadwick
  23. Sean Kelly
  24. Muhammad Saleem
  25. Sarah Lewthwaite
  26. Daniel Montalvo
  27. Mark Palmer
  28. Jade Matos Carew
  29. Sonsoles López Pernas
  30. Greta Krafsig
  31. Jason McKee
  32. Jayne Schurick
  33. Billie Johnston
  34. Michele Williams
  35. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  36. Brian Elton
  37. Julianna Rowsell
  38. Tabitha Mahoney
  39. Fred Edora
  40. Rabab Gomaa
  41. Marcelo Paiva
  42. Eloisa Guerrero
  43. Leonard Beasley
  44. Frankie Wolf
  45. Supriya Makude
  46. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  47. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.