W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey – 23 May 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-05-24 to 2016-05-27.

11 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Meeting Minutes 20 May
  2. WAI site redesign
  3. Contributions to WAI site redesign

1. Meeting Minutes 20 May

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 20 May EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page. Please indicate your acceptance of the minutes below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate. 8
I was unable to attend but have reviewed the minutes or the summary and accept the minutes as written. 3
I have a question or concern about the minutes expressed in the comments below.
I have not read the minutes and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Meeting Minutes 20 MayComments
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was unable to attend but have reviewed the minutes or the summary and accept the minutes as written.
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
Andrew Arch
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
James Green
  • I was unable to attend but have reviewed the minutes or the summary and accept the minutes as written.
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
Adina Halter
  • I was unable to attend but have reviewed the minutes or the summary and accept the minutes as written.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and the minutes are accurate.
  • Laura Keen
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Andrew Arch
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
  • Howard Kramer
  • Eric Eggert
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I was unable to attend but have reviewed the minutes or the summary and accept the minutes as written.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • James Green
  • Adina Halter
I have a question or concern about the minutes expressed in the comments below.
I have not read the minutes and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. WAI site redesign

summary | by responder | by choice

Day 2 of the May face to face meeting was focused on laying the foundation for the redesign of the WAI website. Please review the following;

Please indicate your support of the approach and draft of the current plan to redesign the WAI site.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan. 6
I was not there, but have read the background and current plan and I support this approach and direction. 3
I have questions or comments, listed below. 2
I have not been able to review the materials and expect to contribute by the date entered below.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder WAI site redesignComments
Laura Keen
  • I was not there, but have read the background and current plan and I support this approach and direction.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
 (I participated remotely)
Susan Hewitt
  • I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
 Are we going to add new tasks to the draft plan on the Wiki as a group or should people step up and fill it out themselves based on tasks the volunteered for in the Gant chart?
Andrew Arch
  • I have questions or comments, listed below.
 I'm a little concerned about goal - "Create the WAI site as the #1 Go-To place for web accessibility". How do we do this when many commercial (and non-profit) groups are putting out regular practical advice that we can't match.
Sharron Rush
  • I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
Brent Bakken
  • I was not there, but have read the background and current plan and I support this approach and direction.
James Green
  • I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
Howard Kramer
  • I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
Eric Eggert
  • I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
Adina Halter
  • I was not there, but have read the background and current plan and I support this approach and direction.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have questions or comments, listed below.
 https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WAI_site_plans has: "The highest priority for the IA of the site is to have really good search ability" – Is there any reason to wait to do that? I'd like for us to consider making that a short-term fix that we start very soon.

The following are comments related to current info on: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WAI_Website_Redesign

"Create the WAI site as the #1 Go-To place for web accessibility." – This goal seems related to both content and design. That is, the WAI site can only meet that goal if it has all the content that people want. But we won't – that's not the role of the WAI website. It seems like we'd we want a goal for the "redesign" project that is based on design, usability, etc. (including information design, e.g., of specific pages/content), rather than relying on content (that is, creating lots of new content).

"Empower web professionals with tools they need to be effective in creating and improving accessible web products." This also seems too related to content rather than design.

"Inspire people to care about web accessibility" While I think this is a good goal, I'm not sure it's the first secondary goal.

"Provide multiple entry points and pathways for people across varied roles" Depending on what this means, I'm not sure I agree. But I'm not sure what exactly it is saying.

I think the "Secondary goals include:" list should either be fleshed out or deleted.

I think many points from the previous vision are goals for this redesign: https://www.w3.org/WAI/redesign/analysis-sum#vision

I'm not sure where this fits, but I think it's an important point:
* Site visitors have an idea of what else is on the site. E.g., if someone is given a link and goes to one page, when on that page they get an idea of what else they can find on the WAI website.

"Visual design should be: Engaging/Inspiring, Reliable/Credible, Clear/Practical " – like it! I think that's not only for the overall visual design, it's also for the information/content design.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was at the face to face meeting and this is an accurate reflection of the plan.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • James Green
  • Howard Kramer
  • Eric Eggert
I was not there, but have read the background and current plan and I support this approach and direction.
  • Laura Keen
  • Brent Bakken
  • Adina Halter
I have questions or comments, listed below.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I have not been able to review the materials and expect to contribute by the date entered below.

3. Contributions to WAI site redesign

summary | by responder | by choice

A major dependency for EOWG to be successful in the WAI site redesign is the ability to group participants to actively contribute to the work. It is likely that EOWG participants will be project leads, Eric will be tech lead, and we will rely on active iterative content and design review. Please indicate your interest and availability.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below. 6
I am interested but not sure how to contribute. I would like more guidance about how to participate. 2
I will update the resources that I signed up for as Resource Manager, but not able to do much more beyond that at this time. 2
I am not able to contribute to the redesign effort and pass to the decisions of the group.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Contributions to WAI site redesignComments
Laura Keen
  • I am interested but not sure how to contribute. I would like more guidance about how to participate.
 My experience is with UI template development and content migration. I am willing to support Eric if that's an option.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I am interested but not sure how to contribute. I would like more guidance about how to participate.
Susan Hewitt
  • I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
Andrew Arch
  • I will update the resources that I signed up for as Resource Manager, but not able to do much more beyond that at this time.
will contribute where and as I can :)
Sharron Rush
  • I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
Brent Bakken
  • I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
 I have commented in the Wiki how I can help. I don't have technical expertise, but I will help in other ways as they become available as well.
James Green
  • I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
 I spoke with Sharron today about how I can contirbute.
Howard Kramer
  • I will update the resources that I signed up for as Resource Manager, but not able to do much more beyond that at this time.
Eric Eggert
  • I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
Adina Halter
  • I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
 Can you send a link to the Wiki Draft Project Plan? I think it's the one I added my commitment to but want to be sure.

BTW There is a fantastic Digital Art Director at Comcast who would love to be involved in the design process.
Shawn Lawton Henry I want to contribute lots -- but have limited time. :(

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I am very interested and can take an active role. I have written more detail about my commitment in the wiki Draft Project plan or below.
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Eric Eggert
  • Adina Halter
I am interested but not sure how to contribute. I would like more guidance about how to participate.
  • Laura Keen
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
I will update the resources that I signed up for as Resource Manager, but not able to do much more beyond that at this time.
  • Andrew Arch
  • Howard Kramer
I am not able to contribute to the redesign effort and pass to the decisions of the group.

More details on responses

  • Laura Keen: last responded on 24, May 2016 at 18:25 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 24, May 2016 at 18:49 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 25, May 2016 at 00:43 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 25, May 2016 at 06:52 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 25, May 2016 at 20:32 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 25, May 2016 at 20:37 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 26, May 2016 at 03:47 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 26, May 2016 at 04:38 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 26, May 2016 at 13:56 (UTC)
  • Adina Halter: last responded on 26, May 2016 at 15:13 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 8, June 2016 at 18:33 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Sylvie Duchateau
  3. Kazuhito Kidachi
  4. Jedi Lin
  5. David Sloan
  6. Mary Jo Mueller
  7. Vicki Menezes Miller
  8. Reinaldo Ferraz
  9. Bill Kasdorf
  10. Cristina Mussinelli
  11. Kevin White
  12. Kevin Rydberg
  13. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  14. Denis Boudreau
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Jennifer Chadwick
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Daniel Montalvo
  24. Mark Palmer
  25. Jade Matos Carew
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.