Hi, as suggested by Giovanni Bartolomeo we will also look at
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDB2RDF
for concordance purposes. I welcome other concordance reference points.
John
Semantic Open Data Community Group
This group intends to explore ways to leverage OData as a contributor to the Semantic Web vision and to help achieve a common understanding of both technologies as well as their relationship to each other.
Reports
No reports yet published. The Chair is responsible for publishing reports. More about publishing…
News
One function of the group could be to build a concordance between RDF and OData. OData version 4 is now in its Public Review. See https://www.oasis-open.org/news/announcements/30-day-public-review-for-odata-odata-atom-format-and-odata-json-format-v4-0
RDF is a long time standard of the W3C. See http://www.w3.org/RDF/
So what are the pain points between the standards and could there even be a concordance? Over the next while I hope to architect one.
John
Starting Semantic Open Data Group at W3C …
Successfully tested. Thanks for setting it up!
Edit: As of 2013-JAN-14 I named Ivan and John as chairs to somehow start conducting the business of communication as recommended in the instructions provided 
To my knowledge Ivan is an original proposer of forming such a group and I think also naming John is a good idea. What do the others esp. the “named” chairs think about this? Would both of you be willing to impersonate the role?
PS: I suggest to also add Ken to that role, when he will have registered with the group.
All the best,
Stefan.
Hello world!
Welcome to Community and Business Groups. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!