See also: IRC log
<laura> Scribe List: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Scribe_List
<Wayne> scribe: wayne
<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover
Jim: Metadata on hover.
Alastair: This defines informational content, and it does limit tool-tops
Marla: The icons logos and symbols in like editors where the tool tips are necessary for knowing what they are.
Alastair: The author must not rely are not recognizable (universally)
Marla: That will be hard to enforce.
Alastair: You can use too tip if it doesn't obscure content.
Alan: The original issue is the mouse blocks information.
<allanj> ack
Glenda: This is something that could be solved at the browser.
Jim: There is an out make the same functionality with the keyboard. Hover and focus solves multiple wayse.
Alan: Focus tool tips are not out in general.
<alastairc> For each item of content that is [add]only[/add] shown by hovering your mouse over an element
Glenda: Content is available by a
method other than mouse hover.
... add "for example on focus"
Marla: For a technique we need to add scripting to make this work.
Jim: Mouse pointer covering the tootip. How does it work?
Alastair: Either you cannot read the tool tip or the tool tip covers something else. You cannot rely on the cursor to relay information.
Jim: I made my tooltip hoverable, but the mouse still covers
Alastair: If you can use keyboard focus.
Marla: I moved away from the
original content.
... Rather within the limits of the OS, but they must be
keyboard accessible.
... Mouse user may be excluded from tool tips
Alastair: If we cover the cursor that may need to go to Silver.
Jim: We have a good and useful SC
then without the cursor issue.
... The SC covers everything but cursor covering content.
Alan: The tool tip will overlap something.
Marla: The reason the screen shot (perkins) the screen zoom follows the mouse and the mouse will cover elements. Suplemental unnecessaryu information is in the way.
Alastair: Maybe we need a refined definition if informational conent.
<alastairc> Wording: Content whose primary purpose is to provides information, not navigational or functional elements such as links, buttons or menus.
<shawn> +1 for getting it in today
+1
<shawn> Laura: We'll work on it some more under WCAG WG
<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Text_Colors
<allanj> scribe: allanj
marla: " foreground and background colors chosen from the full range of color choices provided by the user agent" does it include extensions
wd: yes
... issues - hidden text (same fg and bg color), place
holder.
marla: able to view text includes placeholder text
wd: discuss css
jim: concerns about what authors can do to implement this. can authors block user changes?
wd: it is possible for authors to
block changes. code level css with !important will block user
css
... issues with background images. will disappear with high
contrast
<ScottM> +q
gs: background images are important to high volume sites. cannot exclude background.
wd: can't reflow bg image.
<Zakim> allanj, you wanted to say if keyboard functionality works then hover is ok
wd: other ways to do things other than sprites.
scottm: bg images are faster. poor alternatives to bg images for screen reader users. lv users remove bg images to improve the view and loose functionality.
<laura> agree with scott
<laura> WCAG already has: F3: Failure of Success Criterion 1.1.1 due to using CSS to include images that convey important information: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/F3.html
alastair: does a page become unusable when background images go away. there are specific cases. there are better ways of doing things.
<Glenda> I’m comfortable with this proposed SC moving forward…I think this discussion will happen again at the WCAG WG level.
marla: add "without loss of content or functionality" to cover the image issue or other color things that pop up.
wd: or "without loss of important information"
<erich_manser> +1 to adding "without loss..." text
<alastairc> Changed to: Users must be able to change foreground and background colors chosen from the full range of color choices provided by the user agent, without loss of important information.
ja: is this ready to go?
<alastairc> +1
+1
Glenda, alan, laura, wayne good to go.
RESOLUTION: Text Colors https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Text_Colors ready for WCAG 2.1
<Wayne> scribe: wayne
<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover
<allanj> changed def of Informational Content: Content whose primary purpose is to provide information rather than navigational or functional elements such as links, buttons or menus.
<laura> +1
+1
<ScottM> +1
<alastairc> +1
<Alan_Smith> +1 meta data on hover
<shawn> Marla +1
<allanj> marla +1
<erich_manser> +1
<allanj> +1
<Glenda> +1
RESOLUTION: Metadata on Hover is ready for WCAG.
<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Printing_Customized_Text
Take up new menu item
<allanj> alastair: this works already
<allanj> sh: not in pdf
<allanj> sh: author is responsible to present information in a form users can modifiy.
<allanj> Any objections?
Shawn: We need a technique.
<allanj> technique - ensure CSS width only add to 100%
<allanj> marla: apply to pdf
<allanj> shawn: applys to all content. cannot meet this with pdf
<allanj> alastair: covered by "accessibly supported" in WCAG
Alastair: It already has two techniques.
Jim: Test with print preview; zoom and print;
Shawn: Use browser font settings and print.
<allanj> alastair: safari does not have this functinality in print preview
<allanj> ... all browsers on Mac side don't scale
<allanj> ... to print
<allanj> Is Printing ready to go to wcag?
<allanj> +1
<JohnRochford> +1
<alastairc> +1
<shawn> +1
<Glenda> +1
<Alan_Smith> +1
RESOLUTION: Printing Customized Text is ready for WCAG WG
<ScottM> we need mare whereases
<alastairc> scribe: alastairc
<Alan_Smith> I need to drop the call. Thanks. Great work.
Shawn: are we getting to the other SCs? Font family etc.
<allanj> font family, spacing, text style
Wayne: anticipate it would get to
WCAG, and they would say it isn't something an author can do.
Also, need to be able to demo on two platforms.
... Could do as the printing one, and have examples from
HTML.
Would work like the text colour one, you do it in the browser and you've got it.
Allanj: are those three ok?
Shawn: font family and spacing
are the most important ones.
... what about the other pre-TPAC ones?
<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Size_of_all_elements
<allanj> Alastair: reviews
<Wayne> Alastair: Describes the SC.
AllanJ: Any objections?
<Wayne> John: Why are we going from 200 to 400?
<Wayne> Alastair: 400% is achievable. Zooming gets you the mobile site. Greater print requires reflow.
<JohnRochford> John: Suggestion that we add a reference to our reflow SC for above 400.
<Wayne> John: Should we add for large resize use reflow.
<Wayne> Marla: Account for window size.
Alastair: It is the same as WCAG 2, same assumptions.
Any obections?
<ScottM> no
<allanj> +1
<ScottM> +1
<JohnRochford> +1
<laura> none from me
<laura> +1
<Wayne> +1
<Glenda> +1
RESOLUTION: Resize content https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Size_of_all_elements is ready to go to WCAG
<allanj> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Font
<allanj> shawn: fonts available on the system
<allanj> The user can change the font family to any family generally available to the user agent.
Wayne: User agent, often has more
options than OS.
... same for the others.
Shawn: Can take out the "general"
AllanJ: can do that to the others?
<shawn> Alastair: Yes, I'm fine with doing that to the others
<allanj> alastair: ok with making the changes to the others same as font family
<allanj> scribe: allanj
RESOLUTION: Spacing https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Spacing is ready to go to WCAG
<Glenda> I agree with Wayne and Shawn…to make a resolution for things we are passing to Silver.
<JohnRochford> FYI: I added a link, to our Reflow SC, to the new text in the description section of our Size of all elements SC.
wayne: because of the limitation of 2.1, recognize there are essential needs that are not met by these SC. We are not submitting xxx at this time, but will be submitting to Silver
wd: limited by what authors can
do.
... lvtf write a report to wcag about things not covered by 2.1
SC
shawn: if we can say "lv needs can be met by wcag 2.1 sc from lvtf and UAAG20" that would be awesome
RESOLUTION: Font https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Font is ready for WCAG
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Seeing_All_Interface_Elements
<shawn> +1 for simplifying this and taking our the cursor issue (since it's covered elsewhere)
<ScottM> +1
<shawn> +1 for simplifying this and taking out the cursor issue (since it's covered elsewhere) -- in the text and the examples
<JohnRochford> Metadata SC: Informational content that is only shown by hovering a mouse over an element is not used as the only means of conveying information and does not obscure other content.
group editing.
Any objections?
<ScottM> +1
+1
<Glenda> +1
<laura> +1
<JohnRochford> +1
RESOLUTION: Seeing all Interface elements https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Seeing_All_Interface_Element is ready for WCAG
review requirements, uaag 20... see whats missing... write a new document for wcag.
<laura> Lots of green: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Tracking_Success_Criteria_Progress
<shawn> cheers to the group all around and for specific individuals who especially contributed extra
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/webex not webbed// Succeeded: s/stupid Mac autocorrect// Succeeded: s/go./go?/ Succeeded: s/safari does not have this functinality/safari does not have this functinality in print preview/ Succeeded: s/that OS/than OS/ Succeeded: s/lv needs can be met by wcag 2.1 sc from lvtf and UAAG20/ if we can say "lv needs can be met by wcag 2.1 sc from lvtf and UAAG20" that would be awesome/ Found Scribe: wayne Inferring ScribeNick: Wayne Found Scribe: allanj Inferring ScribeNick: allanj Found Scribe: wayne Inferring ScribeNick: Wayne Found Scribe: alastairc Inferring ScribeNick: alastairc Found Scribe: allanj Inferring ScribeNick: allanj Scribes: wayne, allanj, alastairc ScribeNicks: Wayne, allanj, alastairc WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: (no, one)) Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Present+ Shawn, Wayne, Jim Present: Shawn Wayne Jim Alastair Alan Laura Marla Scott Erich Glenda JohnRochford Found Date: 01 Dec 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/12/01-lvtf-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]