See also: IRC log
<fsasaki> checking who is here ...
<camille> SOrry I won't be much available, another meeting.
<fsasaki> thanks for the headsup, camille
<scribe> scribe: Jirka
<Jorge_Gracia> http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/
Jose Emilio Labra Gayo introduces himself and BPMLOD
Jorge Gracia introduces problem areas of BPMLOD
<Jorge_Gracia> http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Main_Page
<fsasaki> topics at http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Topic_classification
<fsasaki> use cases at http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Use_cases_definition
scribe: group is going to gather topics and use-cases and then work on best practices
<Jorge_Gracia> https://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Best_practises_-_previous_notes
<fsasaki> case studies at http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Case_studies
<Jorge_Gracia> Which pattern for naming do we propose as prefered in multilingual scenarios?
<Jorge_Gracia> Which other patterns are acceptable and under which conditions?
<Jorge_Gracia> Metadata for multilingual and multimedia web content
Felix: ITS IG has some scenarios which might be valid in LD context as well.
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/#mapping-NIF
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/#textanalysis-implementation
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/
DaveL: There is another group LD
for language technology
... there is related survey
<daveL> http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/2014/01/18/industry-survey-launch/
DaveL: group will be contacting
people back and creating use-cases from provided info
... you are welcomed to register yourself
jorge: : this can be source for uses cases for BPMLOD as well
<fsasaki> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary
felix: these are use-cases that led development of ITS
felix: the latest draft has been
circulated
... few tables are missing from partners - David, Dave, Ankit,
Phil
<dF> yes
<dF> I will, sorry for the delay
<philr> Can you clarify Personal Costs?
<dF> we've spent everything :-)
<dF> perosonal costs are salaries
<philr> So this is same information from Form C?
<dF> plus everething that is connected to salaries, like pension deductions, benefits etc.
<philr> OK
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Final-review-prep
<fsasaki> 19 feb - final report
<fsasaki> ppt summary of each wp
<fsasaki> take highlights of m24 report
<fsasaki> no need to be detailed - make a summary (bullet points) as a trigger for discussions
drafts should be ready by 19th, before next call
<philr> Yes
<philr> I will be there in time.
Final review preparation will start at 2pm on 25th Feb
<fsasaki> https://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/Description_of_ITS_benefit_per_data_category
Felix: we are behind schedule
<philr> Sorry, I will try to follow up on Quality Rating.
Felix: overdue entries should be fixed
<fsasaki> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/its/attributes
felix: Jirka started filling up WPD website
<fsasaki> jirka: webplatform docs is a reference
<fsasaki> .. each attribute / reference has a separate entry
<fsasaki> .. these can be linked together
<fsasaki> .. and there can be a general intro part as well - you are welcome to fill that in
<fsasaki> .. I was waiting for feedback from the ITS IG, didn't get anything
<fsasaki> .. so I'll use the pattern of the "its-term" attribute for the other attributes
<fsasaki> dave: what would you recommend for attributes that are used together
<fsasaki> .. would you have a page per data category?
<fsasaki> .. e.g. you have its-term, but there is also e.g. its-term-confidence
<fsasaki> jirka: there has to be one page per attribute
<fsasaki> .. if attributes need to be used together you can put examples on one page and reference that
<fsasaki> dave: e.g. if there is its-term-info-ref, you would say "use that with its-term"?
<fsasaki> jirka: yes
dave: similar problem was in ontology
<fsasaki> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2014Feb/0003.html
pablo: introduces readiness data category
pedro: proposal is more and more stable, there is request to customize values
<fsasaki> bpmn from df could be ready by mid next week, could discuss this next call in two weeks
<Yves_> XLIFF 2.0's 3rd public draft will be out within days. For now the focus of the TC is on that. For the XLIFF 1.2/ITS mapping: AFAIK nothing has changed since last call. There is one mapping that still needs to be adjusted I think (for REF locnote I believe).
<Yves_> sure
felix: asks Yves to remind group when XLIFF 2.0 draft is out
<scribe> ACTION: felix to create TR space for XLIFF<->ITS mapping [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-i18nits-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-38 - Create tr space for xliff<->its mapping [on Felix Sasaki - due 2014-02-12].
<fsasaki> no editing now - say e.g. in review that we will encourage people from outside the group to contribute
<fsasaki> give people who add s.t. to the docs a kind of recognition
<philr> Where are details of PC call?
<fsasaki> june 3-4 feisgillt, part of locworld
adjourned
<Yves_> bye
rrsagend, draft minutes
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/xxx/jorge:/ Found Scribe: Jirka Inferring ScribeNick: Jirka Present: camille dF Jorge_Gracia fsasaki giuseppe yves Jirka ankit philR philr pnietoca DaveLewis chaals omstefanov Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2014Feb/0001.html Got date from IRC log name: 05 Feb 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-i18nits-minutes.html People with action items: felix[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]