- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:37:43 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all,
The minutes of last week telecon (25/11/09) have not been sent yet to
the mailing list. Here they are ...
Cheers.
Raphaël
-------------
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference
25 Nov 2009
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-irc
Attendees
Present
+0329331aaaa, +1.403.516.aabb, jackjansen, conrad,
mhausenblas, +61.2.801.2.aacc, silvia, erik, Jack, Michael
Regrets
raphael
Chair
erik
Scribe
jackjansen
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]1 admin
2. [5]2 - short name issue
3. [6]3.2 HTTP
4. [7]3.3 - track and id handling
5. [8]3.4 discovery of track and named fragments
* [9]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 25 November 2009
<scribe> scribe: jackjansen
<scribe> ScribeNick: jackjansen
[10]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/CheatSheet
[10] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/IG/wiki/CheatSheet
1 admin
erik: accept minutes
[11]http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/2009/10/07-mediafrag-minutes.html
<mhausenblas> +1
<erik> +1
all: yes
erik: accept minutes
[12]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/18-mediafrag-minutes.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/18-mediafrag-minutes.html
<erik> +1
all: yes
erik: Michael, will you be able to go to Seoul?
Michael: no, other obligation
erik: will get back to the f2f issue next week
... on action-92, postponed until spec is out
... philippe said publication would be ok today or tomorrow. We
wait.
<erik>
[13]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spe
c/
[13]
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/
erik: what do you all think of current state of the spec?
michael: comment on section 5 needs addressing
jack: wants to think about forward compatibility.
... forward compatibility is tricky: should have a way whereby newer
implementations can retroactively
... tell older implementations to fail or ignore new feature
erik: michael, did Yves suggest we need an implementation?
michael: right
... let's address in the next draft
jack: +1
<erik> +1
conrad: yes, publish now
erik: how many implementations do we have? Ours
... yves has one
jack: mine is rusty. Will brush up in coming few weeks.
erik: silvia? conrad? implementations?
conrad: have uri handling, not full syntax yet. In the next few
months.
... will work with silvia and ogg community
erik: we have server-side implementation.
... is up for testing, will post url.
<scribe> ACTION: erik to get URL for MF server, and post to group
[recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-120 - Get URL for MF server, and post to
group [on Erik Mannens - due 2009-12-02].
2 - short name issue
erik: should we omit -spec?
michael: yes
<silvia> I have client side implementation with HTML5
jackjansen: so we use short name for spec, and add suffices for aux
documents
all: yes.
ACTION on Raphael to fix document names
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - on
ACTION Raphaël to fix document names
<trackbot> Created ACTION-121 - Fix document names [on Raphaël
Troncy - due 2009-12-02].
TOPIC 3.1 media fragment syntax
erik: lets keep for next week
3.2 HTTP
erik: again, let's table
3.3 - track and id handling
erik: COnrads proposal,
[15]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fra
gments
[15]
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments
silvia: need to wait on section 5 to be done.
... may jump in myself.
... Raphaël was working on section 3, don't think on 5 yet
... I will coordinate with him if I also start to edit.
erik: I will ping Raphaël.
silvia: we are missing all our publishing windows.
... and section 5 really needs work before publishing, to reflect
changes to 3.
michael: should we really wait until 5 is complete?
silvia: yes, it contradicts 3 at the moment, I will look over it.
... three sections in section 3 have no counterpart in section 5
... must be fixed.
... cannot publish now, action-112 needs to be fixed.
michael: silvia, can you take this offline with Raphaël?
erik: I will call Raphaël today, tell that Silvia does not want to
publish until action-112 and
... section 5 issues are resolved.
... I will send an email tonight on what the status is.
silvia: if it is needed I can put in time this weekend.
3.4 discovery of track and named fragments
silvia: I wrote about this in my blog.
[16]http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structu
re-of-a-composite-media-resource/
[16]
http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/
<erik> rssagent, draft minutes
jack: not sure if the blog post doesn't need to be split into two:
mechanism (roe, mpeg-21) versus
... application (semantics)
... thinks only mechanism is relevant to MF
... will try to write something up.
erik: will get back to it next week.
... Let's adjourn.
ok.
see you next week!
<mhausenblas> hm, seems Zakim didn't pick up the attendees
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: erik to get URL for MF server, and post to group
[recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/25-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
--
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 21:38:28 UTC