See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 18 November 2009
<silvia> quick discussion amongst Raphael, Erik, Davy and Silvia
<silvia> F2F: when should we have it?
<scribe> Scribe: raphael
Silvia: I don't know if I would
be able to make it
... if we need another f2f, better make it earlier than
later
Erik: same thing here, we will go to Media Annotations anyway
Silvia: it is still a long flight but better than Europe
Erik: time zone are convenient also for Conrad and Silvia
Raphael: I will put a small table
with the key formats in Section 3.1
... key audio and video codecs + container formats
... much smaller table
... second editorial note, add the case that we can foresee
smart media caches
... that will handle range request in other units than
bytes
... my final editorial note in Section 3.5
Silvia: I don't see the
difference with what you wrote
... my emphasis is also on byte identity and no complexity
Davy: I agree, we do not define complexity
Raphael: should we care about making a URI template in complement of the BNF syntax
Silvia: we have discussed that
already, the conclusion is NO, we do not care
... the BNF syntax is sufficient
<silvia> URI templates are an alternative to BNF syntax, so I don't think we need to take care of them
<erik> good luck on doc!!!
Raphael: that was a short telecon, I continue to work on the document so we have more meat to discuss next week
[adjourned]