This is a page from the Cascading Style Sheets Working Group Blog. Some other places to find information are the “current work” page, the www-style mailing list, the Future of CSS syndicator, and the issue list on Github.
Do you want to know how the CSS WG works? Fantasai has written about:csswg, An Inside View of the CSS Working Group at W3C.
:has()
:has()
should work and there are no implementations to date and therefore it was suggested that :has()
shouldn’t be in CR. It was agreed to put it at-risk for now with a note indicating what the disagreement is.:has()
has been discussed so many times and that developers want :has()
so much that just deferring it to the next level would reflect poorly on the group. It was expressed that if :has()
is dropped or deferred the group needed to publicly post an explanation in order to help the community that is so excited to understand the process of the decision. In the meantime, several people will post and talk about ::has()
‘s at-risk status in order to encourage the community to push for implementation if they really care about having it.user-select: none
is a useful feature and we won’t drop it.