Permissions

Interacting with Permissions for Powerful Features

W3C Working Draft

More details about this document
This version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/WD-permissions-20220506/
Latest published version:
https://www.w3.org/TR/permissions/
Latest editor's draft:
https://w3c.github.io/permissions/
History:
https://www.w3.org/standards/history/permissions
Commit history
Editors:
Marcos Cáceres (W3C)
Mike Taylor (Google LLC)
Former editors:
Mounir Lamouri (Google LLC)
Jeffrey Yasskin (Google LLC)
Feedback:
GitHub w3c/permissions (pull requests, new issue, open issues)
Browser support:
Chrome logo43
Edge logo79
Firefox logo46
Safari logoTP
desktop
Android Chrome logo101
Android Firefox logo99
iOS Safari logo3.2
Samsung Internet logo4
mobile
More info

Abstract

This specification defines common infrastructure that other specifications can use to interact with browser permissions. These permissions represent a user's choice to allow or deny access to "powerful features" of the platform. For developers, the specification standardizes an API to query the permission state of a powerful feature, and be notified if a permission to use a powerful feature changes state.

Status of This Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at https://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is a work in progress.

This document was published by the Web Application Security Working Group as a Working Draft using the Recommendation track.

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by W3C and its Members.

This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the 1 August 2017 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.

This document is governed by the 2 November 2021 W3C Process Document.

1. Examples of usage

This section is non-normative.

This example uses the Permissions API to decide whether local news should be shown using the Geolocation API or with a button offering to add the feature.

Example 1: Using .state attribute
const { state } = await navigator.permissions.query({
  name: "geolocation"
});
switch (state) {
  case "granted":
    showLocalNewsWithGeolocation();
    break;
  case "prompt":
    showButtonToEnableLocalNews();
    break;
  case "denied":
    showNationalNews();
    break;
}

This example simultaneously checks the state of the "geolocation" and "notifications" powerful features:

Example 2: Checking the state of multiple permissions
const queryPromises = ["geolocation", "notifications"].map(
  name => navigator.permissions.query({ name })
);
for await (const status of queryPromises) {
  console.log(`${status.name}: ${status.state}`);
}

This example is checking the permission state of the available cameras.

Example 3: Checking permission state of multiple cameras
const devices = await navigator.mediaDevices.enumerateDevices();

// filter on video inputs, and map to query object
const queries = devices
  .filter(({ kind }) => kind === "videoinput")
  .map(({ deviceId }) => ({ name: "camera", deviceId }));

const promises = queries.map((queryObj) =>
  navigator.permissions.query(queryObj)
);

try {
  const results = await Promise.all(promises);
  // log the state of each camera
  results.forEach(({ state }, i) => console.log("Camera", i, state));
} catch (error) {
  console.error(error);
}

2. Model

This section specifies a model for permissions to use powerful features on the Web platform.

2.1 Permissions

A permission represents a user's decision to allow a web application to use a powerful feature. This decision is represented as a permission state.

Express permission refers to the user granting the web application the ability to use a powerful feature.

Note: Limitations and extensibility

Conceptually, a permission for a powerful feature can be in one of the following states:

Denied:
The user, or the user agent on the user's behalf, has denied access to this powerful feature. The caller will can't use the feature.
Granted:
The user, or the user agent on the user's behalf, has given express permission to use a powerful feature. The caller will can use the feature possibly without having the user agent asking the user's permission.
Prompt:
The user has not given express permission to use the feature (i.e., it's the same as denied). It also means that if a caller attempts to use the feature, the user agent will either be prompting the user for permission or access to the feature will be denied.

To ascertain new information about the user's intent, a user agent MAY collect and interpret information about a user's intentions. This information can come from explicit user action, aggregate behavior of both the relevant user and other users, or implicit signals this specification hasn't anticipated.

Note: What constitutes an implicit signal?

Every permission has a lifetime, which is the duration for which a particular permission remains granted before it reverts back to its default state. A lifetime could be until a particular Realm is destroyed, until a particular top-level browsing context is destroyed, a particular amount of time, or be infinite. The lifetime is negotiated between the end-user and the user agent when the user gives express permission to use a feature—usually via some permission UI or user-agent defined policy.

Every permission has a default state (usually prompt), which is the state that the permission is in when the user has not yet given express permission to use the feature or it has been reset because its lifetime has expired.

2.2 Powerful features

A powerful feature is a web platform feature (usually an API) for which a user gives express permission before the feature can be used. Except for a few notable exceptions (e.g., the Notifications API Standard), most powerful features are also policy-controlled features. For powerful features that are also policy-controlled features, [Permissions-Policy] controls whether a document is allowed to use a given feature. That is, a powerful feature can only request express permission from a user if the document has permission delegated to it via the corresponding policy-controlled feature (see example below). Subsequent access to the feature is determined by the user having granted permission, or by satisfying some criteria that is equivalent to a permission grant.

A powerful feature is identified by its name, which is a string literal (e.g., "geolocation").

The user agent is responsible for tracking which powerful features each realm has the user's permission to use via the environment settings object.

2.2.1 Aspects

Each powerful feature can define zero or more additional aspects. An aspect is defined as WebIDL dictionary that inherits from PermissionDescriptor and serves as a WebIDL interface's permission descriptor type.

3. Specifying a powerful feature

When a conforming specification specifies a powerful feature it:

  1. MUST give the powerful feature a name in the form of a ascii lowercase string.
  2. MAY define a permission descriptor type that inherits from PermissionDescriptor.
  3. MAY define zero or more aspects.
  4. MAY override the algorithms and types given below if the defaults are not suitable for a particular powerful feature.
  5. MUST register the powerful feature in the Registry of Powerful Features.

Registering the newly specified powerful features in the Registry of Powerful Features gives this Working Group an opportunity to provide feedback and check that integration with this specification is done effectively.

A permission descriptor type:

PermissionDescriptor or one of its subtypes. If unspecified, this defaults to PermissionDescriptor.

The feature can define a partial order on descriptor instances. If descriptorA is stronger than descriptorB, then if descriptorA's permission state is "granted", descriptorB's permission state must also be "granted", and if descriptorB's permission state is "denied", descriptorA's permission state must also be "denied".

permission state constraints:
Constraints on the values that the user agent can return as a descriptor's permission state. Defaults to no constraints beyond the user's intent.
extra permission data type:

Some powerful features have more information associated with them than just a PermissionState. Each of these features defines an extra permission data type.

Note

For example, getUserMedia() needs to determine which cameras the user has granted the current realm record permission to access.

If a DOMString name names one of these features, then name's extra permission data for an optional environment settings object settings is the result of the following algorithm:

  1. If settings wasn't passed, set it to the current settings object.
  2. If there was a previous invocation of this algorithm with the same name and settings, returning previousResult, and the user agent has not received new information about the user's intent since that invocation, return previousResult.
  3. Return the instance of name's extra permission data type that matches the UA's impression of the user's intent, taking into account any extra permission data constraints for name.

If specified, the extra permission data algorithm is usable for this feature.

Optional extra permission data constraints:
Constraints on the values that the user agent can return as a powerful feature's extra permission data. Defaults to no constraints beyond the user's intent.
A permission result type:
PermissionStatus or one of its subtypes. If unspecified, this defaults to PermissionStatus.
A permission query algorithm:

Takes an instance of the permission descriptor type and a new or existing instance of the permission result type, and updates the permission result type instance with the query result. Used by Permissions' query(permissionDesc) method and the PermissionStatus update steps. If unspecified, this defaults to the default permission query algorithm.

The default permission query algorithm, given a PermissionDescriptor permissionDesc and a PermissionStatus status, runs the following steps:

  1. Set status's state to permissionDesc's permission state.
A permission revocation algorithm:

Takes no arguments. Updates any other parts of the implementation that need to be kept in sync with changes in the results of permission states or extra permission data, and then react to the user revoking permission.

If unspecified, this defaults to running react to the user revoking permission.

A permission lifetime:

Specifications that define one or more powerful features SHOULD suggest a permission lifetime that is best suited for the particular feature. Some guidance on determining the lifetime of a permission is noted below, with a strong emphasis on user privacy. If no lifetime is specified, the user agent provides one.

When the permission lifetime expires for an origin:

  1. Set the permission back to its default permission state (e.g., by setting it back to "prompt").
  2. For each browsing context associated with the origin (if any), queue a global task on the permissions task source with the browsing context's global object to run the permission revocation algorithm.
Note: Determining the lifetime of a permission
Default permission state:

An PermissionState value that serves as a permission's default state of a powerful feature.

If not specified, the permission's default state is "prompt".

A default powerful feature is a powerful feature with all of the above types and algorithms defaulted.

4. Algorithms to interface with permissions

4.1 Reading the current permission state

To get the current permission state, given a name name and an optional environment settings object settings, run the following steps. This algorithm returns a PermissionState enum value.

  1. Let descriptor be a newly-created PermissionDescriptor with name initialized to name.
  2. Return the permission state of descriptor with settings.

A descriptor's permission state, given an optional environment settings object settings is the result of the following algorithm. It returns a PermissionState enum value:

  1. If settings wasn't passed, set it to the current settings object.
  2. If settings is a non-secure context, return "denied".
  3. Let feature be descriptor's name.
  4. If there exists a policy-controlled feature for feature and settings' relevant global object has an associated Document run the following step:
    1. Let document be settings' relevant global object's associated Document.
    2. If document is not allowed to use feature, return "denied".
  5. If there was a previous invocation of this algorithm with the same descriptor and settings, returning previousResult, and the user agent has not received new information about the user's intent since that invocation, return previousResult.
  6. Return the PermissionState enum value that represents the permission state of feature, taking into account any permission state constraints for descriptor's name.
Issue 278: Safari returns different results for current permission state

Safari is the only known UA that returns different results from this algorithm for different settings objects with the same origin. We should test which of the several possible settings objects it uses.

As a shorthand, a DOMString name's permission state is the permission state of a PermissionDescriptor with its name member set to name.

4.2 Requesting permission to use a powerful feature

To request permission to use a descriptor, the user agent must perform the following steps. This algorithm returns either "granted" or "denied".

  1. Let current state be the descriptor's permission state.
  2. If current state is not "prompt", return current state and abort these steps.
  3. Ask the user for express permission for the calling algorithm to use the powerful feature described by descriptor.
  4. If the user gives express permission to use the powerful feature, return "granted"; otherwise return "denied". The user's interaction may provide new information about the user's intent for this realm and other realms with the same origin.
    Note

    This is intentionally vague about the details of the permission UI and how the user agent infers user intent. User agents should be able to explore lots of UI within this framework.

As a shorthand, requesting permission to use a DOMString name, is the same as requesting permission to use a PermissionDescriptor with its name member set to name.

4.3 Prompt the user to choose

To prompt the user to choose one of several options associated with a descriptor, the user agent must perform the following steps. This algorithm returns either "denied" or one of the options.

  1. If descriptor's permission state is "denied", return "denied" and abort these steps.
  2. If descriptor's permission state is "granted", the user agent may return one of options and abort these steps. If the user agent returns without prompting, then subsequent prompts for the user to choose from the same set of options with the same descriptor must return the same option, unless the user agent receives new information about the user's intent.
  3. Ask the user to choose one of the options or deny permission, and wait for them to choose. If the calling algorithm specified extra information to include in the prompt, include it.
  4. If the user chooses an option, return it; otherwise return "denied". If the user's interaction indicates they intend this choice to apply to other realms, then treat this this as new information about the user's intent for other realms with the same origin.
    Note

    This is intentionally vague about the details of the permission UI and how the user agent infers user intent. User agents should be able to explore lots of UI within this framework.

As a shorthand, prompting the user to choose from options associated with a DOMString name, is the same as prompting the user to choose from those options associated with a PermissionDescriptor with its name member set to name.

4.4 Reacting to users revoking permission

When the user agent learns that the user no longer intends to grant permission for a realm to use a feature, react to the user revoking permission by running these steps:

  1. Queue a task on the Realm's settings object's responsible event loop to run that feature's permission revocation algorithm.

5. Permissions API

WebIDL[Exposed=(Window)]
partial interface Navigator {
  [SameObject] readonly attribute Permissions permissions;
};

[Exposed=(Worker)]
partial interface WorkerNavigator {
  [SameObject] readonly attribute Permissions permissions;
};

5.2 Permissions interface

WebIDL[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface Permissions {
  Promise<PermissionStatus> query(object permissionDesc);
};

dictionary PermissionDescriptor {
  required DOMString name;
};

5.2.1 query() method

When the query() method is invoked, the user agent MUST run the following query a permission algorithm, passing the parameter permissionDesc:

  1. If this's relevant global object is a Window object, then:
    1. If the current settings object's associated Document is not fully active, return a promise rejected with a "InvalidStateError" DOMException.
  2. If permissionDesc's name member is not supported, return a promise rejected with a TypeError.
    Note: Why is this not an enum?
  3. Let rootDesc be the object permissionDesc refers to, converted to an IDL value of type PermissionDescriptor.
  4. If the conversion throws an exception, return a promise rejected with that exception.
  5. Let typedDescriptor be the object permissionDesc refers to, converted to an IDL value of rootDesc's name's permission descriptor type.
  6. If the conversion throws an exception, return a promise rejected with that exception.
  7. Let promise be a new promise.
  8. Return promise and continue in parallel:
    1. Let status be create a PermissionStatus with typedDescriptor.
    2. Let query be status's [[query]] internal slot.
    3. Run query's name's permission query algorithm, passing query and status.
    4. Resolve promise with status.

5.3 PermissionStatus interface

WebIDL[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface PermissionStatus : EventTarget {
  readonly attribute PermissionState state;
  readonly attribute DOMString name;
  attribute EventHandler onchange;
};

enum PermissionState {
  "granted",
  "denied",
  "prompt",
};

PermissionStatus instances are created with a [[query]] internal slot, which is an instance of a feature's permission descriptor type.

The "granted", "denied", and "prompt" enum values represent the concepts of granted, denied, and prompt respectively.

5.3.1 Creating instances

To create a PermissionStatus for a given PermissionDescriptor permissionDesc:

  1. Let name be permissionDesc's name.
  2. Assert: The feature identified by name is supported by the user agent.
  3. Let status be a new instance of the permission result type identified by name:
    1. Initialize status's [[query]] internal slot to permissionDesc.
    2. Initialize status's name to name.
  4. Return status.

5.3.2 name attribute

The name attribute returns the value it was initialized to.

5.3.3 state attribute

The state attribute returns the latest value that was set on the current instance.

5.3.4 onchange attribute

The onchange attribute is an event handler whose corresponding event handler event type is change.

Whenever the user agent is aware that the state of a PermissionStatus instance status has changed, it asynchronously runs the PermissionStatus update steps:

  1. If this's relevant global object is a Window object, then:
    1. Let document be status's relevant global object's associated Document.
    2. If document is null or document is not fully active, terminate this algorithm.
  2. Let query be status's [[query]] internal slot.
  3. Run query's name's permission query algorithm, passing query and status.
  4. Queue a task on the permissions task source to fire an event named change at status.

5.3.5 Garbage collection

A PermissionStatus object MUST NOT be garbage collected if it has an event listener whose type is change.

6. Conformance

As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.

The key words MAY, MUST, MUST NOT, OPTIONAL, and SHOULD in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

Two classes of product can claim conformance to this specification: user agents and other specifications (i.e., a technical report that specifies a powerful feature in a manner that conforms to the requirements of this specification).

A. Relationship to the Permissions Policy specification

This section is non-normative.

Although technically this specification and the Permissions Policy specification deal with "permissions", each specification serves a distinct purpose in the platform. Nevertheless, the two specifications do explicitly overlap.

On the one hand, this specification exclusively concerns itself with powerful features whose access is managed through a user-agent mediated permissions UI (i.e., permissions where the user gives express consent before that feature can be used, and where the user retains the ability to deny that permission at any time for any reason). These powerful features are registered in the Registry of Powerful Features.

On the other hand, the Permissions Policy specification allows developers to selectively enable and disable powerful features through a "permissions policy" (be it a HTTP header or a the allow attribute). The APIs and features in scope for the Permissions Policy specification go beyond those identified in the Registry of Powerful Features (e.g., "sync-xhr" and "gamepad"). In that sense, the Permissions Policy subsumes this specification in that Permissions Policy governs whether a feature is available at all, independently of this specification.

A powerful feature that has been disabled by the Permissions Policy specification always has its permission state reflected as "denied" by this specification. This occurs because reading the current permission relies on [HTML]'s "allowed to use" check, which itself calls into the Permissions Policy specification. Important to note here is the sharing of permission names across both specifications. Both this specification and the Permissions Policy specification rely on other specifications defining the names of the permission and name, and they are usually named the same thing (e.g., "geolocation" of the Geolocation API, and so on).

Finally, it's not possible for a powerful feature to ever become "granted" through any means provided by the Permissions Policy specification. The only way that a powerful feature can be granted is by the user giving express permission or by some user agent policy.

B. Automated testing

For the purposes of user-agent automation and application testing, this document defines the following extension commands for the [WebDriver] specification. It is OPTIONAL for a user agent to support extension commands commands.

WebIDLdictionary PermissionSetParameters {
  required PermissionDescriptor descriptor;
  required PermissionState state;
  boolean oneRealm = false;
};

B.1 Set Permission

HTTP Method URI Template
POST /session/{session id}/permissions

The Set Permission extension command simulates user modification of a PermissionDescriptor's permission state.

The remote end steps are:

  1. Let parameters be the parameters argument, converted to an IDL value of type PermissionSetParameters. If this throws an exception, return a invalid argument error.
  2. Let rootDesc be parameters.descriptor.
  3. Let typedDescriptor be the object rootDesc refers to, converted to an IDL value of rootDesc.name's permission descriptor type. If this throws an exception, return a invalid argument error.
  4. If parameters.state is an inappropriate permission state for any implementation-defined reason, return a invalid argument error.
    Note

    For example, user agents that define the "midi" powerful feature as "always on" may choose to reject command to set the permission state to "denied" at this step.

  5. Let settings be the current settings object.
  6. If parameters.oneRealm is true, let targets be a list whose sole member is settings.
  7. Otherwise, let targets be a list containing all environment settings objects whose origin is the same as the origin of settings.
  8. Let tasks be an empty list.
  9. For each environment settings object target in targets:
    1. Queue a task task on the permissions task source of target's relevant settings object's global object's browsing context to perform the following step:
      1. Interpret parameters.state as if it were the result of an invocation of permission state for typedDescriptor with the argument target made at this moment.
    2. Append task to tasks.
  10. Wait for all tasks in tasks to have executed.
  11. Return success with data null.

C. Privacy considerations

An adversary could use a permission state as an element in creating a "fingerprint" corresponding to an end-user. Although an adversary can already determine the state of a permission by actually using the API, that often leads to a UI prompt being presented to the end-user (if the permission was not already granted). Even though this API doesn't expose new fingerprinting information to websites, it makes it easier for an adversary to have discreet access to this information.

A user agent SHOULD provide a means for the user to review, update, and reset the permission state of powerful features associated with a realm or origin.

D. Security considerations

There are no documented security considerations at this time. Readers are instead encouraged to read section C. Privacy considerations.

E. IDL Index

WebIDL[Exposed=(Window)]
partial interface Navigator {
  [SameObject] readonly attribute Permissions permissions;
};

[Exposed=(Worker)]
partial interface WorkerNavigator {
  [SameObject] readonly attribute Permissions permissions;
};

[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface Permissions {
  Promise<PermissionStatus> query(object permissionDesc);
};

dictionary PermissionDescriptor {
  required DOMString name;
};

[Exposed=(Window,Worker)]
interface PermissionStatus : EventTarget {
  readonly attribute PermissionState state;
  readonly attribute DOMString name;
  attribute EventHandler onchange;
};

enum PermissionState {
  "granted",
  "denied",
  "prompt",
};

dictionary PermissionSetParameters {
  required PermissionDescriptor descriptor;
  required PermissionState state;
  boolean oneRealm = false;
};

F. Acknowledgments

This section is non-normative.

The editors would like to thank Adrienne Porter Felt, Anne van Kesteren, Domenic Denicola, Jake Archibald and Wendy Seltzer for their help with the API design and editorial work.

G. References

G.1 Normative references

[dom]
DOM Standard. Anne van Kesteren. WHATWG. Living Standard. URL: https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/
[ecmascript]
ECMAScript Language Specification. Ecma International. URL: https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/
[HTML]
HTML Standard. Anne van Kesteren; Domenic Denicola; Ian Hickson; Philip Jägenstedt; Simon Pieters. WHATWG. Living Standard. URL: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/
[infra]
Infra Standard. Anne van Kesteren; Domenic Denicola. WHATWG. Living Standard. URL: https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/
[Notifications]
Notifications API Standard. Anne van Kesteren. WHATWG. Living Standard. URL: https://notifications.spec.whatwg.org/
[Permissions-Policy]
Permissions Policy. Ian Clelland. W3C. 16 July 2020. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/permissions-policy-1/
[powerful-feature-registry]
Registry of Powerful Features. unofficial. URL: https://w3c.github.io/powerful-features-registry/
[RFC2119]
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels. S. Bradner. IETF. March 1997. Best Current Practice. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119
[RFC8174]
Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words. B. Leiba. IETF. May 2017. Best Current Practice. URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174
[WebDriver]
WebDriver. Simon Stewart; David Burns. W3C. 5 June 2018. W3C Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/webdriver1/
[WEBIDL]
Web IDL Standard. Edgar Chen; Timothy Gu. WHATWG. Living Standard. URL: https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/

G.2 Informative references

[appmanifest]
Web Application Manifest. Marcos Caceres; Kenneth Christiansen; Matt Giuca; Aaron Gustafson; Daniel Murphy; Anssi Kostiainen. W3C. 17 February 2022. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/
[Geolocation]
Geolocation API. Marcos Caceres; Reilly Grant. W3C. 18 March 2022. W3C Candidate Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/geolocation/
[GETUSERMEDIA]
Media Capture and Streams. Cullen Jennings; Bernard Aboba; Jan-Ivar Bruaroey; Henrik Boström; youenn fablet. W3C. 10 March 2022. W3C Candidate Recommendation. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/mediacapture-streams/
[push-api]
Push API. Peter Beverloo; Martin Thomson. W3C. 23 March 2022. W3C Working Draft. URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/push-api/